FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Jake White hails the irremovable Bullsh*t Steyn

Jake White hails the irremovable Bullsh*t Steyn

Started by sharkbok64 REPLIES2,408 VIEWS· 26 Sept 2020, 13:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,234 posts
26 Sept 2020, 13:03
#1
26 Sept 2020, 13:03#1

A great role model for younger players that want to play a one-dimensional donkey kicking game. 


White hails BS StainMorne Steyn in possessionPublished on September 26, 2020 326  26

Vodacom Bulls coach Jake White says veteran flyhalf Morne Steyn still has a ‘massive role to play’ for the team during the upcoming domestic season.

Steyn is one of two flyhalves in the Bulls 30-man squad for Saturday’s pre-season clash with the Sharks, with 26-year-old Chris Smith also in the squad.

ALSO READ: Super Fan Saturday teams

The 36-year-old returned to Pretoria at the beginning of this year after spending seven years in France with Stade Francais, a move which coincided with youngster Manie Libbok’s exit from the franchise.

It will be the first time that Steyn and former Springbok coach White work together as during Steyn’s peak, White was overseas with the Brumbies and Montpellier.

Speaking before the Super Fan Saturday matches, with the Bulls back in action for the first time since mid-March, White hailed Steyn’s ability.

‘I have never worked with Morne Steyn before and when he was flourishing in South Africa, I was overseas,’ White said.

‘I did watch his progression at Stade Francais, where he won championships with them, and he’s just an unbelievable team guy, full of energy.

‘He’s a lot more athletic than people think and the older he’s got, the more he understands what he can and cannot do.

‘He looks after himself, he’s very fit and he’s a great role model. There’s no doubt that he still has a massive role to play at the Bulls and he’s exactly the sort of general we need.’

Rubbish Jakes record in the two years leading up to the WC was so poor that he was on the verge of being sacked. He had run out of ideas, had no second plan and his selections accounted for his failings. Enter Eddie Jones and everything changed - so there is no doubt that if you go from losing most of your matches in the year leading up to the WC and then go win the WC with the only change to the equation being Eddie, then it’s pretty obvious where the credit is due Jake was an above average coach, who was piss poor at selecting the right players and with it all is by all accounts a complete prick and why he never manages to stick with a side for too long You can’t be a great coach if your players don’t like you
Me not liking Jake has absolutely nothing to do with Luke Watson. I’m not naive enough to judge a coach on the strength of his inability to manage a player. I judge him based on his record knowing full well he was good in his first two years and then completely lost the plot. It’s a fact that he was on the verge of being sacked because his record was so poor. It’s also obvious that Eddie changed Jakes fortunes at the WC along with a draw seeing us playing nothing of note other than England and to a far lesser extent Argentina Rassie is twice the coach Jake is. His record in one season surpasses anything Jake ever achieved. One only needs to listen to what ex players like Dalton, the Beast and AJ Venter had to say about him. In a nutshell a coach with limited skill who relied on strength and conditioning to achieve results, was a dictator and had his pets The worst kind of teacher ever - you know that one that had his pets

Saffex, I don't buy into that Jake was deliberately poor. You have to go back at the squads he picked and some of the star players he brought forward during that time. It was Jake that got Habana, Steyn and Pietersen in early. 

Nobody knew who Habana was, but Jake selected him only after playing a couple of Currie Cup matches at 13

I think he is a great coach at identifying young talent. 

He also deliberately picked a weaker squad that meant we lost a few games, but that was in the interest of the player welfare and the rugby World Cup. 

Don't forget, Rassie did the same, he had a 50/50 win ratio in the first year and actually had a really good B team that won key matches against Argentina and Australia. 

I don't like Jake on the way he conducts himself in the media, he has a seriously bad attitude and is perhaps a bit of an opportunist, but he delivers and I'm expecting the Bulls to do well.

I'm also glad he is coaching in SA again as he will help SA unearth some more fantastic young players


2006? Injuries: Schalk Burger (broken neck), Bakkies Botha (calf surgery), Jean De Villiers (cracked rib), Bryan Habana (cracked rib), Butch James (groin and knee), André Pretorius (groin), Joe Van Niekerk (C5 & C6 vertebrae), Jacques Cronje (cracked rib), Danie Rossouw (hamstring), Juan Smith (left quadriceps), Eddie Andrews (back), BJ Botha (back surgery), CJ Van Der Linde (Leg), Gurthro Steenkamp (broken hand), Pedrie Wannenburg (wrist surgery), Marius Joubert (fractured hand) among other lesser injuries.

He still ended stronger than he started, with a last second kick preventing an away win over Australia and taking the All Blacks close away. Beat them both back to back to close the campaign and broke England's stranglehold on us. Sure sign off a great coach.

Rassie, the ideas man, without the ideas. The most defensive and negative handsoff head Bok coach we've had in my lifetime. Leaning heavily on that crutch, Nienaber. Taken the Boks from a modern and evolving team to a stoneage collection of plodders behind tier two nations. One big game against a very good match up and a win over the worst Wallaby side in 45 years (thanks mostly to Esterhuizen, whom Josè Erasmus overlooked for the cart horse Dud1, who failed to deliver yet again). 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Sept 2020, 01:39
#21
29 Sept 2020, 01:39#21

Worse than Coetzee's 2017 season. One received praise, one was fired. 

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
29 Sept 2020, 13:10
#22
29 Sept 2020, 13:10#22

Coetzee had no f*ing clue what he was doing. He just thought he would show up with a tracksuit and win games. 

One thing that our best coaches had in common was all the work they did behind the scenes

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Sept 2020, 13:23
#23
29 Sept 2020, 13:23#23

He did know what he was doing. He doesn't know nothing about the game. He tried to install an attacking game, that the fans had demanded for years, without strong defence. Rassie merely limited the attack and tried to conceal those defensive vulnerabilities. They are still present, those flubs from the likes of Damian and Steph are still present, but the team isn't leaving itself open to turnovers in quite the same manner. Coetzee's model wasn't well suited to the Boks, or those particular players. Rassie leaned on Krutch Nienaber. In the end, Coetzee achieved a higher output on attack and his 2017 stands as superior to Rassie's 2018. That's not an opinion. That's a statement of fact. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2020, 14:19
#24
29 Sept 2020, 14:19#24
King stop speaking kak at no point did Jake deliberately select a weaker squad, no coach is that stupid not even Jake. I see pathetic Aug is banging on about injuries - poor little boy, one would swear a coach had every player at his disposal all the time. Fact is as the record shows, Jake had a good record in his first two years but was never good enough to adapt once the world had worked out his plan. Fact is in the two years thereafter and in particular the year leading up to the WC, Jake was fucking pathetic. The man had no idea when it came to picking players or how to move on from the predictable bash crash he advocated. Hell it took Schalk moving to Saracens to learn the obvious - there is more productivity in attacking space than taking contact all the time. Fact is, on authority, Jake was close to being fired just before the WC as his record was insulting. Instead of sacking him they brought in his saviour Eddie Jones and we got back to our winning ways. The fact we only played England and Argentina to win the WC was an added bonus as well. To say Jake won us a WC is utter bullshit - Eddie and average opposition were the major contributors. Jake is an above average coach, who’s selections are always suspect. Look no further than selecting v Rooyen, Morne, Aplon, Nortje and Hendricks at 12 this past weekend. But most of all Jake is a complete prick who is both a dictator and a coach who has his pets. Jake never demonstrated any master strokes in his time Rassie is on another level, the guy is a rugby genius as he demonstrated at the WC. The bomb squad was a master stroke as was his plan against the Japs and moving the point of the boot in the final. It was brilliant I’d take Rassie’s 50% win in year one followed by the unrivalled second year, winning the RC, WC, moving to number 1 and producing the world number one player. Rassie is a master, Jake an obnoxious pretender. Jake’s test record is simply not good enough given the talent SA always has at its disposal. 66% is pathetic
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Sept 2020, 14:31
#25
29 Sept 2020, 14:31#25

On the away leg of the 2007 TNs, Jake selected a weaker team. The NZ pilots made a joke when introducing them to the rest of the passengers. That patchwork team held Australia to 21-0 at half time and held NZ to within 6 points until the final 20 minutes of the game. I stopped reading from there, as your knowledge of the Boks is too poor for further reading. 

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,234 posts
29 Sept 2020, 15:37
#26
29 Sept 2020, 15:37#26
Peer respect is more important than from layman fans. My guess is that the top coaches in the world respect Rassie, and his achievements.
(Currently top of the IRB rankings, and the defending World Cup champs). 
Both Rassie and Jake White have overseas success. Unlike Meyer and Tootsie , who were pathetic. 


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2020, 16:10
#27
29 Sept 2020, 16:10#27

Jake was close to being fired because he wasn’t choosing the lousy runt Watson....who was totally out of his depth at the test level. And the Bools joined the Watsonistas because they thought they could wrest control of Bok rugby.

It had zero to do with Jake’s coaching, it was political....but it did effect team morale and Jake was forced to fly back to RSA to defend himself hurting preparation.

Jones contributed some nuances to our backline play which showed up in the pool games....in the knockouts we played disciplined Bok rugby.

And Aug is totally right....Erasmus simply fell back on our traditional game while Coetzee tried to be expansive, which all our foolish fans like Biltongbek, Mike and the media were clamoring for....then when he failed they never believed that.


Funny, hypocritical stuff.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2020, 17:22
#28
29 Sept 2020, 17:22#28
That’s rubbish Jake nearly got fired because his record was so poor. Watson only played one test was it not? Hardly record defining Fact is Watson was by far our best openside at the time, Schalk was never a 6, always better suited to 7 or 8. Luke was a brilliant linking 6 but had a pathetic agenda. It’s testament to how average Jake was as a coach that he was unable to manage and embrace someone different. There was nothing traditional about how we thumped the Japs in the second half or thumped the Poms in the final Rassie more than any other coach has the ability to sum up what is required to beat each side and have a plan in place to do it. He is on a different level to average Jake
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
29 Sept 2020, 17:53
#29
29 Sept 2020, 17:53#29

Saffex.....you hardly thumped England in the Final ! That was at the last WC  

We were very poor but battled on. 

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Sept 2020, 17:55
#30
29 Sept 2020, 17:55#30

Some of the ideas Jones wanted to implement wouldn't be viable until the ELVs. His Wallabies were often penalised for obstruction because of their layered attack. We saw some movement which utilised this against minor opponents, occasionally. Mostly against Namibia in our first warm up. To say Jones rebuilt our blueprint is a lie and rather embarrassing exaggeration. We won with the Jake model. There is no way Jake would persevere for four years and then backtrack for the final hurdle. As Os said, the Boks were already running many of the Brumbies moves etc, but having someone who installed some of those elements on the team filled the players with a bit more confidence. That was, in the words of Os, his greatest contribution. Later, before the Lions series, Jones would say that he didn't contribute a great deal. He never did specify what he did exactly.


As for Rassie. There is no evidence in all his years of senior coaching that he has any ideas, or is even on a par with the lastest advancements in the game. His greatest contribution is Nienaber, his defensive guru. Without that, you have teams who consistently languish at the bottom of every statistical category for attack, be that test level or super rugby level, even with loaded teams . There is no tangible evidence that Rassie is anything more than a man manager and opportunist. He likes positive speak. It doesn't always work. Rassie is afterall 1/2 in WCs. You said the loss to Australia was because of garbage coaching, that there was no plan. That was Rassie and Nienaber's first bite at the apple. You always embarrass yourself Saffy. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2020, 20:51
#31
29 Sept 2020, 20:51#31
Becs you are right we did not thump you we thrashed you in the final For a WC final 32 - 12 is a thrashing
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
29 Sept 2020, 21:27
#32
29 Sept 2020, 21:27#32

Yes, and all because of a man you and Lügnerin said should be dropped. Stop throwing cream pies at your own face Saffy 

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
29 Sept 2020, 22:07
#33
29 Sept 2020, 22:07#33

Saffex.....we all know scores don’t always accurately represent matches. 


I agree, you well and truly beat us, but it wasn’t a thrashing  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2020, 22:12
#34
29 Sept 2020, 22:12#34
Aug what horseshit are you talking - who won us the game that I said should be dropped This should be a laugh Becs you got utterly thrashed Beaten to a pulp by our forwards and ripped to shreds by our backs True the score line was not a true reflection - we should have scored a try or two more
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
29 Sept 2020, 22:26
#35
29 Sept 2020, 22:26#35

Saffex...if you couldn’t have beaten a rag taggle bunch of old men, crippled players and youngsters, then you really need to have a think about that !!

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Sept 2020, 01:08
#36
30 Sept 2020, 01:08#36

Actually if England got over the line in the 6 or so minutes of the great goal line stand they would have had a good chance of winning the game. That goal line stand was  key to building belief in the Boks and doubt in the Poms....and at that time the score was only 6/3 to the Boks


Fortunately brilliant tackling by Mostert,  Marx and even Malherbe stopped them a few times where it seemed a certainty they would score.  I believe that was like deuce at 5 all in the 5th set of a tennis match.  Whoever won those  6 minutes would win the game. Here’s the commentary:



35'6-6 Penalty goal - Owen Farrell , England33'England STILL with the penalty advantage but they're going backwards. Another penalty advantage for offside. May on the left flank, tries to flip the ball out but nothing there, and when England go back inside, Tom Curry knocks on. They'll go all the way back for the original penalty (there were two in total) and Owen Farrell makes his point to Jerome Garces that there should be some consideration towards a penalty try. Nothing doing there though with the referee, who dismisses the claim. 32'Still the advantage exists, still England look for room, still South Africa refuse to buckle. Youngs to Billy Vunipola, nothing there. Itoje. Nothing there. Cole. A little more space. England are a metre from a try. Youngs to Billy again, nothing. Wide to Farrell, to Daly, to Watson, but too high. Watson does well to keep the ball. 31'First time that England have built phases inside the South African 22. They're within five metres of the line - penalty for England. Youngs looking for space. It goes wide. Ford, nowhere to go. More phase ball. 30'A nice lineout move from England still has a moment of incompetence, with a pass sliding through one set of hands but landing straight into another pair in a white shirt. Still, England come forward.



KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
30 Sept 2020, 11:38
#37
30 Sept 2020, 11:38#37

Oh Jesus Sadsex, Jake set out a 18 month conditioning plan to deliberately leave the likes of Du Preez at home from the end of year tours so that they can get rest and conditioning. 

The all blacks tried the same by letting their players start later in the super rugby, that all backfired and their players were a bit under cook. 

Yes, whites team had a massive dip in the middle and that was his own fault. 

The fact remain, he deliberately left his best players at home

https://www.allblacks.com/news/jake-white-leaves-stars-at-home/

FACT and schooled 

8 of the 2007 World Cup winning Boks got left behind

The players that got left behind

Among those who will be left behind are: Fourie du Preez, Victor Matfield, Bakkies Botha, Percy Montgomery, Os du Randt, Schalk Burger, Joe van Niekerk and wing Bryan Habana.

The team that he took 

The team is: (Forwards): Johan Ackermann, BJ Botha, Gary Botha, Deon Carstens, Jacques Cronje, Hilton Lobberts, Johann Muller, Chiliboy Ralepelle, Danie Rossouw, Lawrence Sephaka, John Smit (Captain), Juan Smith, Pierre Spies, Albert Van Den Berg, CJ Van Der Linde, Pedrie Wannenberg; (Backs): Jean De Villiers, Bevan Fortuin, Jaque Fourie, Butch James, Enrico Januarie, Akona Ndungane, Wynand Olivier, Ruan Pienaar, JP Pietersen, Andre Pretorius, Jaco Pretorius, Francois Steyn.

But he also took some dead weight with him too. 

But even though that was a poor tour you can see the names that had a break out season.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
30 Sept 2020, 11:53
#38
30 Sept 2020, 11:53#38
Brilliant tackling by Mostert - that’s a joke, would that include the two tackles he missed England had absolutely no chance that day regardless of whether they scored then or not. The Boks has their number for 90% of the game and had there been a more favourable bounce, Mampimpi would have had a second Rassie ran his masterclass that day, making Eddie look like an amateur
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
30 Sept 2020, 12:47
#39
30 Sept 2020, 12:47#39

Players of the game: Beast (MOM), Mostert, Mapimpi, Kolbi, Willie, Frans, Faf, Pollard, Vermeulen.

How many of those did fans attack in the buildup to the WC? Add in Louw, who saved our bacon so we had a final to contest!

The class acts were a no show. In the end, no Beast, no WC victory. That was the decisive contribution that put England on the backfoot, something NZ couldn't do. 

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
30 Sept 2020, 14:18
#40
30 Sept 2020, 14:18#40

So what I'm picking up on this thread is that although we are ecstatic to be world champions, be it unconvincingly given that we did not beat NZ in any of our games in 2019. 

The fact that England blew NZ out of the water in the Semi's and somewhat came in underdone. 

But also, I think the Boks might have had a good chance in Finals against NZ. 

I think the next 4 years will tell whether we have finally found a coaching structure that allows SA to stay on top of the world or are going to continue to yoyo only to resurface as world champions 12 years later. 

95 / 07 / 19 

our results in world cups has also been sporadic. 

So lets hope we can carry on and finally put that to bed and stay on top of the world. 

Rassie is very clever and will find another way to develop the Boks. 

Hopefully we'll see more of the type of players like Kolbe that can we can unleash some attacking potential 

↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Rugby

More news