When Du Preez came through as the scrummie for the Bulls in circa 2000 under Meyer as coach his main attributes were -
* his personal attacking play; and* the tendency on his part to pass balls to forwards.
Through the years the latter tendency became less obvious and his strategic game improved. In this tournament the former tendency was not much in evidence - but the latter returned with a vengeance.
The question remains - who decided on the relevant strategy being introduced in the present series - was it Meyer or Du Preez or both of them? What was clear from the word go was that the strategy was flawed and not working - so why was this strategy in fact persisted with?
Coach57,555 posts
25 Oct 2015, 17:53
#1
25 Oct 2015, 17:53#1


