FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Mallett's Comments on the Stormers

Mallett's Comments on the Stormers

Started by clevermike9 REPLIES312 VIEWS· 25 May 2015, 09:38
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 May 2015, 09:38
#1
25 May 2015, 09:38#1

The following from News 24:-


"Former Springbok coach Nick Mallett says the Stormers have the pack of forwards to take them to the Super Rugby title.


Mallett was speaking in the SuperSport studio following the Stormers’ 31-15 win over the Melbourne Rebels at Newlands as the weekend.  “The Stormers have a pack of forwards to win this competition,” said Mallett. “They've got a very good tight five. Their front row is the best in the competition from a scrummaging point of view and they lean very heavily on it to win them penalties. Their lineout was improved and their loose forwards were fabulous. Duane Vermeulen, Schalk Burger and Siya Kolisi were very good today (Saturday).


The Stormers though copped criticism in some quarters for their inability to bag a four-try bonus point, especially after they had scored their third try as early as the 45th minute.

Mallett attributed this to below-par backline play.


 “The big question mark I've got about this Stormers side is do they have the backline from structured attack able to breakdown a New Zealand backline? The answer there is probably no, because the Stormers score a number of their tries from broken play, usually off opposition mistakes.


They don't have the physicality in the backline and they don't have the good running lines or control from 10 to create their own opportunities. But they were certainly deserved winners today and they are also going to be deserved winners of the South African conference.”


The lack of physicality referred to by Mallett is definitely relating to the midgets making up the bulk of the Stormers backline.   Other than the try scored by De Allende, the two tries scored by Leyds stemmed from errors made by the Rebels in broken play.   


This is nothing new and Mallett's comments as highlighted above are spot on in this case.  And the low number of tries scored by the Stormers year after year shows a sickness of mind in the case of the team management.        

BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
25 May 2015, 11:40
#2
25 May 2015, 11:40#2
Management at the Stormers are just plain stupid! This problem has been around forever, if they are too stupid to figure out that Flek is a k@k back line coach and that their backs are too small, then it is their own fault they can't score tries. 
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
25 May 2015, 11:46
#3
25 May 2015, 11:46#3
 There's nothing new in what Mallett is saying, he's just stating the obvious and as a matter of fact I've made exactly the same comments a week ago. I've also said that Fleck has to go, he is no backline coach.....that's blatantly obvious as well.
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
25 May 2015, 11:52
#4
25 May 2015, 11:52#4
It is so obvious to everyone except those running the show in Cape Town. They can argue that winning is the most important thing, but bonus points are very often the difference between playing knockout games at home or away. 
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
25 May 2015, 11:55
#5
25 May 2015, 11:55#5
It helps if you know that you don't know.  
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
25 May 2015, 12:25
#6
25 May 2015, 12:25#6
This article actually throws Damian into question. Does he have the ability to create space? 12 has the greatest capacity to create space, and 10 sets the depth and alignment and play calling. How well do 10 and 12 communicate. Do they have the physicality to bring play closer to the gainline? Not much pertaining to de Jongh as you thought Michael. If 10 and 12 do their job, the rest will be much better.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 May 2015, 12:32
#7
25 May 2015, 12:32#7
 Balls as per normal.  The idiot at it again.   De Allende is the sole backline player that does create space in the Stormers backline by making line breaks and by beating defenders and making effective off-loads.   He and Van Wyk are the only two players who are not physically-deficient.
Hell your deductions from what is said and written is so far-fetched and without any  foundation whatsoever - that it indicates some serious mental deficiency.  
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
25 May 2015, 12:34
#8
25 May 2015, 12:34#8
 Perception Mickey...perception.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
25 May 2015, 19:30
#9
25 May 2015, 19:30#9
 I'll take de Allende any day of the week and twice on Saturday. I see Fransie as backup utility back.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
25 May 2015, 21:01
#10
25 May 2015, 21:01#10
 Mike I posted Mallets comments elsewhere on the board.Look anybody with more than one brain cell would understand the dynamics at play here.Allende is the only back barring perhaps Groom at scrummie - as scrummies can get away with being small - who meets the physical requirements. The Stomers pack is working overtime to cover the backline and will not always be able to do thsio adequately agaisnt good backlines.
Poor Fleckie has to put up with a coach bent on picking these small players by the dozen. Lets keep the ehat on where its needed Alsutair coetzee who has ignored a guy like Howard.Alistair is a backline specialist coach and should know better but it takes forever for the penny to drop with this guy.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news