FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Moz my counter on your JJ nonsense

Moz my counter on your JJ nonsense

Started by Saffolk 87 REPLIES1,540 VIEWS· 13 Oct 2013, 22:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Oct 2013, 15:27
#41
16 Oct 2013, 15:27#41

Problem is Moz, your takes are incorrect.......for JJ would not have been turned over had Kolisi cleared Read out. But more to the point, the Boks intended to attack at that point given both Morne and Jean passed him the ball. Do you think they intended him to just run into touch when Morne could have kicked it out instead. Fact is Jean wanted to attack and JJ did a good job by running the scissor, beating Cruden and Nonu to set the ball up.

 

 

JJ did NOT overrun a pass, Morne passed behind him and JJ was NOT in front of Morne

 

 

JJ missed Barrett AFTER Jean and then Morne missed him, not to mention Kirchner missing him after JJ did on while covering.......so how the hell do you conclude that JJ cost the try given Barrett was in fact Morne's man, the inside defender   

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Oct 2013, 15:30
#42
16 Oct 2013, 15:30#42

Boklogic, I know you are thick but I don't ever recall eliciting Rooineks support to take on your rugby brain!!!

 

 

So in your opinion, given you proclaim to still play the game, do you score or set up a try every time you make a break, if you ever do!!?

 

 

Lets take the beating of Savea for instance and putting Willie into space.......was that not a try scoring opportunity that Morne botched up going over the line huh?

 

 

Try again and try add some weight to the shit you talk  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Oct 2013, 16:16
#43
16 Oct 2013, 16:16#43
 Kol isi was nowhere near Read when he turned JJ over....that was the problem JJ ran into an area where he had no protection. Dave this is just your latest loyal but misguided attempt to support your man. I stand by everyone of the other statements as well....he was ahead of the pass and it became his job to tackle Barrett, just as it became his job to tackle Bosch....he had the best shot at them
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Oct 2013, 18:10
#44
16 Oct 2013, 18:10#44

Mozart

 

Agree - Kolisi was nowhere  near Read and he got run over by Messam when he tried to tackle him - like he was nowhere as well.

 

For the rest he was nowhere for 80%  of the time he spent on the field of play - but do not blame him only for that one - since he equalled the performances of Louw and Vermeulen wider out and Alberts was only noticeable 10%  of the time.

 

The AB loosies played a game covering the whole field of play - ours managed to cover 10% of  the field of play.

 

However, to blame Engelbrecht alone for the so-called turnover and for the Barrett tackle is ingenious.   In the first case Steyn played the idiots game and did not make a relieving  kick he should have done virtually on half time.   Naas himself said it was idiotic - so I am not alone in that one.

 

You blame Engelbrecht for the loss - but he is only third of the list of players to be blamed.   The real catalogue is -

 

1    Morne Steyn - missed  tackles,  direct result 2 tries - idiotic play,  1 try - partially responsible - 1 try (Barrettt);

 

2    Willem Alberts - missed tackle - one try - idiotic clumsiness - 1 try (Messam)

 

3    JJ Engelbrecht - missed tackle 1 try  (Barrett) - knocking ball on and indirectly responsible for another try (Messam - second try). 

    

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Oct 2013, 19:01
#45
16 Oct 2013, 19:01#45

 Ingenious or ingenuous?  You see I happen to agree Alberts bought the Messam try and Morne missed Barrett. It's obvious you only have to look at the tape.

 

 

But JJ was responsible for the halftime try (turnover and missed tackle on Nonu), did botch a great attacking chance by overrunning the ball and was the player who made best contact with Barrett before he scored. That's also obvious.

 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Oct 2013, 19:26
#46
16 Oct 2013, 19:26#46

Mozart

 

First of all - Morne missed a tackle on Ben Smith before he scored his try after Alberts buggered up first.   Morne kicked out the ball which led to Messam's try - even Naas said it was stupid not to.   Morne was instructed by Meyer to pass more often and kicked less - but in his own 22 when the siren was about to sound the end of the first half - that really showed he is robotic with clueless ball sense.   Aside of that he also missed the tackle on Read when he scored his try.   Really a complete hash if ever there was one.

 

I accept that Alberts was responsible for missing the tackle on Read - but he also fell over his own feet flat on his face  and failed to recover the ball after Aaron Smith was tackled - he was in the best position to do so being nearest to the tackled player.   But Alberts is notorious for clumsiness - even Tomas mentioned it pertinently  previously - and incapable of breakdown ball recovery at all. First  Messam try.

 

I do blame Engelbrecht for the Barrett try and held him partially responsible for the Messam second try - so he is third on the list of match losers.

 

     

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Oct 2013, 19:36
#47
16 Oct 2013, 19:36#47

The point is, we know what Alberts can do and he can put in crushing hits. Morne is among the top three goal kickers on the planet. The guy who is new is JJ and the question with him is whether he can be defensively sound. If the answer to that is yes, his attacking potential  will give him the nod in spite of his poor judgement at times. Based on the RC though, that question remains unanswered, he has been cul pable in tries any defensively competent 13 should have stopped. And that's the truth of it.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Oct 2013, 19:54
#48
16 Oct 2013, 19:54#48

Mozart

 

To an extent I agree with you - but you cannot have one-dimensional players in a tam that do well things like kicking at goal - and bigger up badly for the rest.   Alberts make some good tackles - but far too few in any given match and that is as far as his playing capacity goes.  

 

Engelbrecht to my mind is really a wing that never really adjusted to center.   He has defensive problems - I grant you that.   What bothers me is that he sometimes vanish from sight in matches and when doing so he is poor - and very poor at that.   For instance he was not a factor at all in Saturdays game between the Cheetahs and the Bulls.

 

I am not "married" to the idea that Engelbrecht shall be our 13 in future - hence my comments that we should see what happens in Super 15 next year.   What worries me also is that the French and Welsh have very good centers and they might just beat his defence as well.  

 

 

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
16 Oct 2013, 22:55
#49
16 Oct 2013, 22:55#49

 Saffex, Juan De Jongh beat Daniel and Coetzee in last years Currie Cup final and he finished the try off. Should he be the Bok centre?

 

You just talk shit man! Dont worry what I do when I make breaks on the rugby field. The difference between me and JJ is a whole lot of money and international status. I dont get paid to do what JJ "should" be doing but I reckon if I got fit enough I could do what he does. I could demonstrate absolutely no ideas on attack and can certainly miss tackles on guys as slight as Barrett.

 

Open you eyes and see what is in front of you, not what you conjure up in your rugby-free brain! The team you coach must be getting dicked every game as you are coaching a 7's style. 1 miss tackle and the opposition team is under the poles because its no one elses job to make the tackle except the inside man! ha ha laughable stuff really.

 

Barrett ran right into JJ. Slap bang. He shielded the ball with 2 hands, closed his eyes and braced for contact. To his surprise, Moses parted the rugby field and he had a free run. How come all these debates include JJ. Bosch and Barrett try. It wasn't Jannie and Jean or Jannie and Habana. It is always JJ involved. The other 2 mentioned dont fuck things up!

 

JJ can run like the wind but thats where it ends. I didn't know pace was enough to be a Bok centre. Would JJ make the All Blacks team?? Barrett cant tackle for shit but he may let a try in but he will score you 3! JJ just lets them in! Face it, your boys JJ and Jantjies are touch rugby players!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Oct 2013, 23:27
#50
16 Oct 2013, 23:27#50

 boklogic

 

I know there are some fans who see something in Juan de Jongh - but what I have seen the further away he is from Springbok selection - the better it would be for he Springboks.

 

There are a number of reasons for that.   During the whole of 2011 he scored two tries on CC and Super 15 level - he increased that to 3 tries in Super 15 and CC in 3012 - two in Super 15 and the CC final try.   This year he was not any better in attacking play.   That shows that from an attacking perspective he is harmless and a very marginal selection on Super 15 level.   Nobody expect from a player to score a try each game he played in but to play about 48 Super 15 matches and 12 CC matches - the number of  tries scored by him or even try-assists - where he contributed none - is way below par.    At least Engelbrecht has scored some test tries - he has not had any from 2o11 to date.   The one excellent opportunity  he had in the Wallabies test last here he buggered up completely.

 

In 2012 he had come from the bench once - against the Wallabies and it ws a fiasco.  He played in two tests (Murrayfield and Twickenham) and in both tests he did zero = matter of fact he had in the Twickenham the largest number of zeroes I have ever seen in the ESPN stats system on games.    In effect he made up the numbers on the Springbok team sheet - nothing more.

 

De Jongh started off with the reputation that he is a good defender - but this year in Super 15 he destroyed to my mind his reputation  for defence completely.   He missed 25% of all attempted tackles - which is a very high percentage and totally unacceptable.   Engelbrecht missed 16% - also too high - but not a patch of what De Jongh missed.

 

Problem is that I think the opposition found him out and his tackling ability was countered.   De Jongh is physically very small -  he used to way 84 kgs - and now claims his weight is 87 kgs.   With the much bigger and stronger players nowadays - he is too weak to contain them and when he is up against a good tackler - they often enough tackle him back.   One thing  positive though he used to knock on more balls than he did in 2013 and possession loss after tackles also declined this year.

 

Be it as it may - I said earlier that Engelbrecht - with his deficiencies - is still our best  option - De Jongh has way too many negatives to be selected.     

 

 

 

 

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 00:26
#51
17 Oct 2013, 00:26#51
Moz sorry but you are wrong, JJ was not ahead of Morne on that pass there is video evidence to prove it.

Its also complete crap that JJ was best placed to tackle Barrett........that responsibility fell squarely on Morne's shoulders, not only because he was the inside defender, he was also close enough to tackle him but made a pathetic attempt instead as he did on 3 other occasions in the match. JJ was covering the outside channel and had to turn to try tackle Barrett from behind......so its complete and utter bullshit that JJ was best placed to tackle Barrett.

As for Kolisi not being near Read, again complete bullshit and I'll happily provide the Youtube time of play to prove it. JJ gets past Nonu, but Nonu clips JJ to cause him to stumble on his way past, Read runs towards JJ and dives on him, he then gets up to effect the turnover at which point Kolisi hits him........these are the facts......its not clear whether Read rips the ball back or Kolisi kicks or knocks the ball forward......all we do know is that the ball is sent a good 10m back.

Moz your anti JJ plays its part in every take on his performance on the day, none more so than your sour take on his wonderful beating of Savea.

JJ proved you wrong in that match, he proved he was more than a handy speedster in space......he proved he could step and beat a man on the outside. JJ's position at 13 was never in doubt, but that performance confirmed he is there to stay for some time
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 00:45
#52
17 Oct 2013, 00:45#52
 Ek sien die Saffex doos weet ook fokol van rugby. As Morne die binne verdediger was en JJ die buite verdediger, waar de moer was Jean. O ja, hy was natuurlik die poepol wat uit die lyn uit opgeskiet het om die gaping te skep. Daarna hardloop Barrett na die buitekant direk na JJ en nou is die skielik Morne se man.

Saffex, jy is net fiokken dof. Barrett was so ver aan Morne se buitekant, nadat hy al reeds vir Jean geklop het, dat dit eintlik 'n wonderwerk was dat Morne naby kon kom. JJ het altwee sy hande op Barrett gehad en het net te kak getackle.

Eerstens was Barrett deur Jean gemis en en toe hy buite toe hardloop was dit direk in JJ se kanaal in.

As jy sulke kak menings het, is die kans seker ook goed dat jy dink Jantjies is 'n goeie speler.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 00:58
#53
17 Oct 2013, 00:58#53
Look here you stupid dutchman piss off back under the rock you just crept out of and this is an English speaking site so fuck off
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Oct 2013, 01:52
#54
17 Oct 2013, 01:52#54

Van

 

Whether you like it or not - the sooner Morne vanish from the Springbok team - the better the Springbok backline will be.  He is robotic without any ball sense whatsoever.

 

Why the hell did he not make a relieving kick in his 22 - when the siren was about to call the end of the first half?   Because Meyer told him to stand flatter in the channel and pass the ball more and kick less.   So he passed the ball and gave Naas a fit about senseless play.

 

He missed tackles like he is paid to miss them  and in the end he is basically responsible for the loss of the Springboks in the Ellis Park test.   The idiotic non-kick and the missed tackles resulted in four of the five AB tries.  

 

You and Saffex can argue till you are white in the face - but Morne if he made even a slight effort - was in position to tackle Barrett - but like in all the other tackles he missed - the attempts were feeble and useless.

 

The AB's should put up a monument of Morne - in every test he played against them - he more than any other player - buggers up the efforts of the Springboks. 

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:00
#55
17 Oct 2013, 02:00#55
Goosen is back, useless Morne is pissing off to France thank goodness, Bok rugby will be in safe hands with Goosen.......the bloody kid needs to just stay away from bloody injury
BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:24
#56
17 Oct 2013, 02:24#56

 That is correct. Jean got ahead of himself, Morne was nowhere and fucked it up but JJ became the best placed to make the tackle. He was not behind Barrett when they first met. He ended up behine Barrett as he was beaten like he was not there with his revolving door defence.

 

My picture clearly showed JJ in PERFECT position to tackle low. He does not like to tackle low..That is clear and is a massive problem..

 

Frans Steyn needs to get back to his best!!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:36
#57
17 Oct 2013, 02:36#57
Crap Morne was right on top of Barrett but went high, JJ was covering wide, expecting the inside defender to tackle Barrett. JJ's attempt was a last gasp attempt given he had to turn to try tackle Barrett, could not align properly, had to go high from behind effectively, leading with the wrong shoulder - FACT.

Had JJ been in front of Barrett and not covering wide, he would have tackled Barrett with ease as he had the previous 12 tackles he had made in two tests against the AB's

Imagine believing an international centre does not like to tackle low, man you would have to be one stupid prick to believe that.........it would be like saying an international prop does not like contact, or flyhalf does not like kicking..............are there really such stupid rugby followers out there?
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:41
#58
17 Oct 2013, 02:41#58
 "Look here you stupid dutchman piss off back under the rock you just crept out of and this is an English speaking site so fuck off"

Luister jou dom doos. Sover ek sien is hierdie webwerf SARugby, met verwysing na Suid Afrikaanse Rugby. En as jy nie jou kop in jou hol gehad het nie, sou jy geweet het dat  Afrikaans een van die amptelike landstale is in Suid Afrika. As jy te kak is om dit te wil verstaan, sal ek voorstel dat jy eerder die een is wat fokof. Jou veralgemening en verwysing na "dutchman" dui vir my duidelik dat jy ernstige vooroordele het en nie 'n benul het wat aangaan nie.

Of is jy die amptelike spreekbuis van hierdie webwerf. Is dit dan die amptelike standpunt van die webwerf, wat bedoel is om oor Suid Afrikaanse rugby te gaan dat Afrikaans verbode is hier? Moerse interessant!
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:44
#59
17 Oct 2013, 02:44#59
 Fuck off Dutchman you are not welcome......speak English, you are mumbling.......voetsek
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:47
#60
17 Oct 2013, 02:47#60
 "Crap Morne was right on top of Barrett but went high, JJ was covering wide, expecting the inside defender to tackle Barrett. JJ's attempt was a last gasp attempt given he had to turn to try tackle Barrett, could not align properly, had to go high from behind effectively, leading with the wrong shoulder - FACT."

Kak verskoning! Jy probeer maar net om een van jou draadtrek fantasië te beskerm. 'n Speler hardloop reguit in sy kanaal in en hy mis die duikslag. Op sy sterk skouer. Dit was net 'n kak duikslag.
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:52
#61
17 Oct 2013, 02:52#61
 "Fuck off Dutchman you are not welcome......speak English, you are mumbling.......voetsek"

Hoekom trek jy nie liewer Engeland toe nie? Ek dink jy sal goed inpas daar.

Hierdie is 'n Suid Afrikaanse webwerf vir Suid Afrikaanse rugby. As jy nie daarmee kan vrede maak nie is dit maar beter dat jy uit die land uit fokof na 'n plek, waar jy nie Afrikaans hoef te hoor of te lees nie!
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 02:57
#62
17 Oct 2013, 02:57#62
Look here you stupid Dutchman, do you see any other posts in Afrikaans on here......does that not tell you something or are you too stupid to comprehend the obvious.

What part of fuck off do you not get.......make sure you close the door on your way out and don't forget that comb in your sock.

I have lived in England since 1999 and I know more about SA rugby than you will ever know........put that in your pipe and smoke it.......now piss off
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 03:02
#63
17 Oct 2013, 03:02#63
 O fok ja, ek kon dit seker maar verwag het. 'n Slapgat wat weggehardloop het van die "swart gevaar" en wat nou sy grootbek opinies op 'n Suid Afrikaanse webwerk kom afsmeer. En jy kan beslis nie meer van Suid Afrikaanse rugby as ek of enige ander persoon weet nie, want jy weet in elk geval fokol van rugby.

Ek is hier om te bly en jy dit in jy pyp sit en verstik!
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 03:15
#64
17 Oct 2013, 03:15#64
Dutchman which opinions have I voiced on here huh? There is nothing slap about earning the English pound and going to sleep with the front door unlocked.......who is the idiot here?

Enjoy your time here Dutchie dont be surprised if you get little reaction with your taal posts.......I felt the need to say my bit given you are fucking stupid enough to open by attacking me.......I am going to eat you up and spit you out for the ignorant conservative prick that you are......let me guess, you think useless Morne is great, the bloke who does not have a creative bone in his body and you still tap to Bless Bridges!!
NU
nukefreekiwiClub Pro441 posts
17 Oct 2013, 03:41
#65
17 Oct 2013, 03:41#65

Jeg hater når folk bruker et annet språk til den som blir brukt i hele diskusjonen. det er utrolig uhøflig og eksklusive. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
17 Oct 2013, 06:04
#66
17 Oct 2013, 06:04#66
Hehe.....lapsing into Tongan again Nook?  
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 09:53
#67
17 Oct 2013, 09:53#67
Nukefreekiwi.
Jy kan maar Noorweegs praat, ek verstaan dit, maar eintlik is hierdie 'n Suid Afrikaanse webwerf. Ek sou opinie as waardevol geag het as hierdie 'n Engelse, Nieu Zeelandse, of 'n Australiese webwerf was. Of moet die Franse, of die Duitsers of die Japanese nou in Engels pos op hulle eie webwerwe, net omdat dat werfetters soos Saffex is wat dit van buite af besoek?

Saffex.
Dankie dat jy dit sommer dan ook bevestig dat jy 'n rassis is. Dan weet ons waar ons met jou staan. Dit is toe nogal baie maklik om jou te ontbloot.

Ek sien jou Bles Bridges aanmerking is ook maar net 'n verdere aanduiding van jou veralgemenings op grond van taal, wat dan ook sal manifesteer in die redes waarom jy weggevlug het. Jy is die konserwatiewe een, wat mense klassifiseer op grond van sekere karakteristieke en dan 'n tipe apartheid wil skep vir die wat nie die presiese selfde eng verkrampte waardes as hy aanhang nie.

En dis werklik nie eers nodig om jou aan te val nie. Jou eng eenogige idees wys alles duidelik. Eintlik noem ek maar net die ooglopende.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
17 Oct 2013, 11:39
#68
17 Oct 2013, 11:39#68
 

I see the inbred Jungle Bunny's still going on about JJ.


Give it a rest will ya.


No matter how many times you twist the facts regarding “Jinking” JJ, it won’t change the general perception of the boy.  You’re the only one (as usual) singing his praises.   The rest of us see him for what he is … useless … not a center to begin with … and definitely not Bok material … ok, Stupid??


Now run along and go get your fat obese prop of a son another plate of doughnuts, before he tears another hammie reaching for the spiced up buffalo wings.


How is he by the way???


 


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Oct 2013, 11:41
#69
17 Oct 2013, 11:41#69

Van

 

I am Afrikaans speaklng - but basically bilingual - as well.  Grew up in the Southern Cape and other members of my family never spoke English - even though they understood English.

 

Basically I think that this website has members all over the world - a substantial number of whom cannot understand Afrikaans at all - I normally use only English on this site.  The issue is that foreign members - make this site very interesting, since there are more variations in discussion.

 

I took Saffex to task about his attitude about Afrikaans - and he stated clearly that he just do not understand the language well enough to understand it properly and that he has left SA in the early 1990's and lost contact with what he used to know.   I met him in London - when I went to watch the Springbok tests against the England and Scotland and he really is a nice person to know.

 

That does not mean that I do agree with his rugby views on many issues - fact is we disagree strongly on a lot of them.   He are often insulting when you disagree with him - but that does not constitute anything important  insofar as I am concerned.

 

As I said there are many members from other countries - even Argentina - on this site - you will get more pleasure to post your views in English on the site and see how they respond as well.   Hope you find this contribution as reasonable.

 

You seem to be a Morne fan - and from what I have written - you must know that I am anything but.  S o you can go for me as well. 

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
17 Oct 2013, 12:00
#70
17 Oct 2013, 12:00#70
 
As far as I'm concerned, Van can speak any language he chooses. I understand what he's saying and that's good enough for me. Besides he probably expresses himself better in Afrikaans ... if he really needs to make himself understood I'm sure he'll speak English to the kiwis and ozzies on this site.


Who the hell does Stupid think he is ... dictating to us what language is and isn't to be spoken here on this board.

Fuck him and the horse he rode in on.

Besides, it's not about the language ... it's about the Afrikaaner people. He's a racist with a very large chip on the shoulder.

He ran away during the apartheid era, as a half breed, speaking afrikaanse (his home language by the way) ... so that he can mouth off at us from afar.

He's a whimpering coward ... no more ... no less.




CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Oct 2013, 12:17
#71
17 Oct 2013, 12:17#71
 CW, jy moet net weet dat ou Maaikie se laaste paragraaf nie sonder voorbehoude is nie. Indien jy van hom gaan verskil gaan hy jou persoonlik aanval en uitskel. Dit gaan  ook nie help jy plaas feite en bewyse op die tafel nie. Hy sal sê jy lieg. Selfs video grepe wat die teendeel bewys is nie goed genoeg nie. Dit is ook alles liegstories en oëverblindery. Lees gerus hier as jy lus is om  te lag. http://sarugby.com/forum.cfm?threadid=6101
CW
cwvdmerweRookie50 posts
17 Oct 2013, 12:21
#72
17 Oct 2013, 12:21#72
 Nee Mike. Jy het my verkeerd. Ek is beslis nie 'n Morne ondersteuner nie, maar in hierdie een geval spreek die feite vanself. Jean het fouteer en 'n reuse gaping gelaat. Na dit het Barrett direk in JJ se kanaal in gehardloop. Morne kon slegs 'n hand bykry en die kans vir 'n suksesvolle duikslag is seker minder as 5%. Hy peil in JJ se kanaal af en JJ kry altwee hande om Barrett, maar is te swak om hom te hou.

Dieselfde geld vir meeste van die driee ook. Swak kommunikasie het verdediger in swak posisies geplaas wat duikslae moeiliker gemaak het. Vat maar Beast se patetiese poging met Messam se drie. Dis omdat hy verby die spel gehardloop het, terwyl hy in 'n perfekte posisie sou gewees het as hy net die spasiering gehou het.

Jean het aanleiding gegee tot die beslissende drie omdat hy paniekerig was. As hy net sy lyn gehou het, was daar geen gaping nie. Verdediging gaan oor veel meer as net 'n duikslag. Dit gaan oor jou struktuur en jou lyne. As die verdediger die lyn self breek, hoef die aanvaller nie eers te werk nie.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Oct 2013, 13:04
#73
17 Oct 2013, 13:04#73

Van

 

I agree with you on the above.

 

Just forget about Ceradyne please - he really is a joke and a sh!t stirrer.   Bad news that one.   He is ignorant beyond belief - even if h e tries to sound otherwise. The only member I ultimately treat with richly deserved contempt is Ceradyne - also known as "windpomp" or really fart smell.

 

Look - there is every chance that I will differ from you on many points in future - but I generally do not start the personal name slanging attacks - but sometimes respond in kind when personal attacks on me happen.  

 

I think Meyer has shown some progress as a coach - but would like to see what squad he comes up with for the EOYT.   His selections in some cases are very conservative and he is let down by  players he selects on that basis.. 

 

 

 

 

  

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Oct 2013, 13:49
#74
17 Oct 2013, 13:49#74
 Ou Maaikie. I have challenged you time and time again to go back to that one thread, so that we can finish the debate, but you do not have the balls to do so. Instead you left that debate by throwing a few last insults without standing up to your lies.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Oct 2013, 13:58
#75
17 Oct 2013, 13:58#75

 Was not lying about Morne Steyn in the Stade Francais match - his kicking was ineffective - but this is not the topic in this case.   It is not worth while to discuss that issue any further - since you persist with your wicked misineterpretation.

 

The above topic basically relates to the Ellis Park Test.   Morne was atrociously bad in the test at Ellis Park and no amount of lies on your part will show otherwise.  Windpomp is the name Beeno calls you - my appropriate translation for that one is Fart Smell.

 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Oct 2013, 14:10
#76
17 Oct 2013, 14:10#76
Who said  anything about lying? Guilty conscience? I said that we needed to finish the debate.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Oct 2013, 15:06
#77
17 Oct 2013, 15:06#77

Ceradyne

 

you accused me of lying previously and you know that yourself.  Anyway start a new thread if you want a further discussion on that issue .   Maybe - just maybe it will dawn on you this threat is about the Ellis Park test - upon which we have not seen yet how you justify Morne's BS performance.  Come now - let us have the joke so we can all laugh about it.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Oct 2013, 15:31
#78
17 Oct 2013, 15:31#78
 Ou Maaikie, you are one of those "critics" whose first option is to find somebody to blame, and you are not the only one. You see, there is a slight difference between loosing a game and being beaten by a better team. This thread is actually about egos and has nothing to do with the game itself. Saffex is a massive JJ Engelbrecht fan but he has a passionate hate for Morne Steyn. Moz is not a fan of JJ Engelbrecht. You have a distinct dislike in both JJ Engelbrecht and Morne Steyn. Saffex started a new thread to get to Moz about Moz' take on Engelbrecht. Why? because there were probably a few things on the other threads that could be a bit of a thorn in his side. I don't know.

You see the scenario developing here? If only one of the three of you liked and disliked the same players, this thread would not even have existed. Moz accuses Engelbrecht for one of the tries being scored, and Saffex gets pissed off. Apart from your dislike in Steyn and Engelbrecht you are also suffering from some complex because of the numerous times the Moz has kicked your butt, but you cannot quite jump into the exact same bed as Saffex to get to Moz, because then you have to start liking Engelbrecht, so what do you do? You jump on Morne Steyn's back and that suits Saffex' dislike in Steyn.

The joke of the entire issue is the fact that the game took place almost two weeks ago and after much deliberation, fighting, swearing, name-calling, watching and re-watching video clips, you still do not have consensus over who to blame. The players on the field had fractions of seconds to decide what the correct action was going to be.

Why would I want to have part of the idiocy? It makes for nothing more than entertainment. From a rugby point of view it is one huge joke. A satire.

On the subject of the other thread that I mentioned.......... Why start a new thread? Why can't we just go back to the previous one. All the arguments are there. Or do you not want everybody to read your ludicrous arguments again?
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2013, 15:51
#79
17 Oct 2013, 15:51#79

CancerCunt, are you back talking rugby or just yapping at my heels........there is more credit in your yapping, keep it up.

 

How is Boshoff coming along as our Bok flyhalf.......I see the poor thing has been ousted by Jantjies again, a real 10

 

 

Dutchie, I see you are still here blabbering away in Afrikaans, I have given up reading your shit, just do us a favour and piss off, we don't want Afrikaans on this site as it serves to exclude those who don't understand it. I know you are too fucking dom to comprehend this basic concept, so thought it best I pointed it out.

 

 

In a nutshell, using Afrikaans is rude - get it?  

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
17 Oct 2013, 16:22
#80
17 Oct 2013, 16:22#80
Why what's wrong, Stupid?? Having difficulty grasping the concept of talent again? Still seeing "jinking" JJ's on the telly, huh??

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaaa!!!!

Boshoff comes in at 10 and wins man of the match ... over and over again. Get's pushed to 15 so that our quota selection can have a little game time and what does he do ... he goes and wins man of the match ... again and again ... and that playing out of position.

Then due to a little niggle ... the quota gets dropped from the match 23 and so Boshoff get's pushed back to 10 ... and what does he do ... yeah ... you got it ... he wins man of the match ... again.

Damn ... that must be sooooooo annoying ... hey Jungle Bunny??

There's just no stopping this talented kid kicking ass. Sure he'll win man of the match in any position in the back line. You see he knows that tucking into plate after plate of doughnuts isn't good for you. Unlike someone I know. How is Stupid jr?? He doing fine??

Are you seriously giving someone a lecture on rudeness? Pffffffffaaahahahahahahaaaa!!! Perhaps you should give that rethink, huh Stupid!!


↓ LOAD MORE (page 3 of 3)

More from Rugby

More news