Mozart and the ESPNscrum Stats

Mozart provides context. You don't. It's how you use numbers that counts. Th ere is a lot of scope for dishonesty and no doubt the very reason why you over-emphasize them and strongly reject the footage which provides the context and detail.

 Letsal
I want as response from Mozart - not from the worst idiot on this site.    

Well if the worst idiot on the site can paddle you like a wench then you have my deepest sympathies! 
Mozart will answer you in his time, why you are so desperate to be outdone remains the mystery however.

 You do not know what you are talking about in this case - but it is similar to other postings of yours - drivel of no value.
I will lay a bet - Mozart won't answer those questions.  He will try and get around them with another personal attack on me.
  

"But it is similar to other postings of yours - drivel with no value" 
"He will try to get around them with another personal attack on me" 
I must have been a hyena in my past life, such is the laughter bellowing from me!! You are priceless Mika

There's funny for you...Liarmike as Inspector Clouseau.

 Mozart
As I expected - three simple questions asked and no answer forthcoming.  What a bloody farce you make of this site.   

You are hardly one to talk, when have you ever answered my questions? And I mean without slinging mud of course. The only contributions you make are personal attacks, one step away from becoming Rooinek. That my friend is a farce. My bet is Mozart is bored of the repetitiveness. How can anyone blame him, the man is so much your intellectual superior you should consider yourself fortunate that he acknowledged your childish little rants. 

 No- that is not the case here.   He used the same system of performance evaluation based on stats as I do.  But that is where it stopped - he only make the same evaluations if he thinks he can use it to discredit players he does not like.  He would never use it in the case of players like Francois Steyn and Juan de Jongh - because the data does not confirm the rubbish he writes on this site.
About three weeks he did a calculation of the tackle efficiency of De Allende and came up with a figure just about level with the efficiency of Francois Steyn.   The real difference was that De Allende made vastly more tackles than Steyn did.  I then wrote in response that I agree with him - the missed tackles by De Allende is too high and that the Stormers must do something about it.  However, there is a huge difference on attack De Allende compensates for the too high percentage tackle misses by being much better in attacking play than Steyn ever was over the last 4 years.  That is proof that Mozart uses exactly the same formulae as I use when it fits him.   
When it does not  fit him he makes BS statements that I only use numbers - there are way too many bugger-ups made by his favourites (and yours) based not on stats - but on actual play. 
Ask him why he is not consistent in using stats and he only uses stats when he wants to attack players he does not like and why does  he refuse to use stats in all cases and when it slaps him in the face he still refuses to recognise a nd accept it.  .            

Damian is poor on attack, except when he runs into open space. Not a 12. 

 The craziness of Letsalbemorons is booming again. LOL

I t's all in the footage Michael. One of the definitions of insanity is not believing reality, so I suppose that makes you insane. Another definition is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results. I rest my case.

   There is not a smiley implying shaking your head in utter amazement.