Mozart has a habit of making far-fetched statements about individual players being the reason for the loss of matches. That is the constant on this site and the information he used is a totally unscientific farce.
The motive always is the same and the players he generally goes for are always discredited by him - whether on a factual basis or not. He would never accept anything positive about the players he dislikes as factual and is not beyond manufacturing information contrary to fact and use it on this site.
He has been going on for months now in his attacks on Lambie and claimed that Lambie solely is responsible for a number of match losses. He would not mention anything about cases - like the Ellis Park test last year where Lambie in fact converted a decisive goal kick in the last minute of the test. Matter of fact he was saying the kick was not important in the context of the game.
However, the worst of Mozart is when he gives match reports and lies through his teeth about what actually happened on the field of play - or try and manufacture excuses for his favourites who bugger up badly.
The Lambie - Steyn Debate
Now lets look at the lies and misrepresentations a bit more carefully:-
"Steyn has started 9 games at 10 for the Sharks over the last two seasons....and won 6.
Of the 9 games played - 5 were IN SOUTH AFRICA - 4 were in Australasia. Plain facts but the above suddenly became "Many of these games were played in Oz/Nz last year." - the emphasis being on MANY.
"Sure it's all random you say, but the sample size is getting rather large. Perhaps a winner that rises above his mistakes is better than a loser who is too cautious to make mistakes."
What muck is the above statement about? What scientific basis has the so-called sample - NONE. The verbal diarrhea in the next statement is inexplicable.
Previous Responses to similar rubbish
This is not the first time Mozart came up with this type of argument - and it was previously pointed out to him there is NO BASIS on which such deductions and statements can be made. His response was his childish habit of posting inappropriate pictures - and a continuation of his lies and deceptions.
APD's Response
After months of repeating the same junk on the same topic - APD got sick of the nonsense and summarized the test results since Matfield's return to the team. That caused serious problems for Mozart and suddenly -
* he said that "For example in the Welsh test there were only five players who were carried over from 2013."; and
* "I admit it's imperfect science, but a data point which asks a crucial question, can Lambie lift the Sharks overseas."
Lets analyze the above BS a bit. The team changes is an excuse for Matfield - but it is not an excuse for Lambie. After months of pointing out the absurdity of making statements like the one under discussion - now suddenly "I admit it's imperfect science,". The latter admission is a lie - Mozart carries on with the same line of thought he expressed previously.
IF WE WANT SOME REASONABLE DISCUSSIONS ON RUGBY ISSUES ON THIS SITE - THE ONLY WAY OPEN IS TO DEAL ON ISSUES ON A FACTUAL AND PROVEN BASIS - NOT ON ABSOLUTE CRAP DEDUCTIONS MADE ON A SUPERFICIAL BASIS.
