Mozart - why no comments on the second ODI against England?

The people pretending that this is a one-sided issue and that ou Maaik is solely responsible for all this mud-slinging are the sickening, bum-licking fawning suck-ups that I call the Servile Gimps.

Says the one who repeatedly calls another poster on here "Moffie"

Interesting, I have never seem Mozart call you the names that Mike is calling him on multiple threads.

That is what I have an issue with, his language when female posters are on this forum

If you then want to call me a fawning suck up for admonishing Mike for that, and you yourself don't say anything to Mike about it, then I can only accept that you agree with Mike's language.

Then again, I do realise that I am talking to the same poster who, in a childish drunken stupor, told everyone on this forum to fcuk off and ran off to have his little tantrum because most people on here didn't agree with him  on something.

Mike

Three questions........

1)  Have you ever confronted Piss Mint for calling Mozart "Moffie" all these years, or is that just not offensive enough to you?

2)   Have you ever seen Mozart call Piss Mint the names that you have, on multiple threads on here ?

3)    Irrespective of what anyone calls you on any forum....Do you think that it is acceptable to use that language with female posters on here?

Simple......... Yes or No answers will suffice

It's a little condescending of you to assume otherwise.  

I think I have said this before blueb ok...... get off that high horse you always sit on.

If you, or even the men on this forum think it is completely acceptable to use that kind of language in front of your wives, daughters etc etc, then it certainly says a hell of a lot more about you than me.

It is not condescending, nor is it being rude, or arrogant to expect and request a poster to not use that language on this forum.

Simple

So Piss Mint

Do you agree with Mike's language on here?

Yes or No

Simple question

I can only imagine where this forum would be headed if we approved and accepted the language we have recently seen on here.

At least have some respect for yourself...... if anything

How about you let us all use our common sense then Mike

Do I believe you are a pervert... No

Do I believe you are a paedophile..... No

Do I believe you can respond without using disgusting language.... Yes

Uh-oh . . . there goes the hand to the hip and the foot has started to tap. Dumb Ass is about to go into one of his sanctimonious rants. Be prepared!

You are the exception to the rule Piss Mint

In your daily drunken stupors I assume those around you are quite used to your foul and disgusting language.......

I just don't think the rest of the people on here fall into your category

It's funny Piss Mint

You post replies,  but won't answer my question

Is it because you don't want to be seen as endorsing the kind of language Mike is using here.

C'mon...... be a man for a change

My "Protegee"

Bollocks Mike

You very easily forget when I defended you against Mozart a while ago when he posted some comments about you that I did not like

I guess it goes to whatever suits your argument at the time.........

"My "Protegee"

Bollocks Mike"

The Servile Gimp trying hard to pretend that he's not a Servile Gimp. LMAO!

Also, who is this self-important and indignant hypocrite to say that "bollocks" is okay but other words aren't? Who does this puffed up wannabe-class-monitor think he is?

DA, I'm just pointing out that female posters don't need a big strong man to take care of them. They are plenty smart and strong enough to do it for themselves. The fact that you expect them to exist under different set of standards tells me you don't view them as capable of dealing with the same reality 'us' men live in. That IS condescending! Put another way, if the language is not good enough for a woman, it is not good enough for a man either. 

Correct....... I know many strong, intelligent, successful woman

The rest of your post is absolute bollocks

If you and 10 mates are sitting in a pub watching a rugby game using this type of language on your own, it would be seen as "normal" banter between males.

If those same 10 mates are watching that same game in the pub and a man walks in with his young daughter, are you saying you would carry on with that language as per normal?

It seems your take on this is "Well, she came into my pub environment, screw her, why should I stop what I am saying, she must just accept it, and deal with it herself".

Whereas, most men would probably say, guys, tone it down, there is a lady present.

It's not about different standards and it's not condescending..... it's about respect

Hopefully you get it

"My "Protegee"

Bollocks Mike"

The Servile Gimp trying hard to pretend that he's not a Servile Gimp. LMAO!

Also, who is this self-important and indignant hypocrite to say that "bollocks" is okay but other words aren't? Who does this puffed up wannabe-class-monitor think he is?

Still no answer from the resident coward

Clearly because he disagrees with the use of it, but won't say it

It's about as repetitive as his daily drinking habits

Sad really

A guy who has been booted off numerous web forums due to his disgusting behaviour

A guy with a drinking problem

A guy with no moral compass

A guy with a drug problem

A guy who has been proven numerous times on this very forum... to be a compulsive liar

A guy with no integrity

Yep....... Sad really