FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Only two of the ten best boxers on the planet under 30

Only two of the ten best boxers on the planet under 30

Started by Mozart44 REPLIES584 VIEWS· 04 Jan 2015, 16:56
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jan 2015, 09:12
#41
07 Jan 2015, 09:12#41
 So suddenly I cannot calculate an average age - so lets see what the following team produces - based on average  gae at the start of the WC in September this year:
15   Willie le Roux        -     26 years14   Seabelo Senatla   -      21 years13   JP Pietersen         -     29 years12   Jean de Villiers     -      34 years11   Bryan Habana      -      32 years10   Handre Pollard     -      21 years 9   Fourie du Preez    -      33 years 8   Duane Vermeulen  -      29 years 7   Willem Alberts      -      31 years 6   Francois Louw      -      30 years 5   Victor Matfield      -      38 years 4   Eben Etzebeth      -      23 years 3  Jannie du Plessis    -      33 years 2   Bismarck du Plessis -     31 years 1  Tendai Mtawarire    -     30 years
I put in Senatla on the wing - and Pietersen at 13 - as well as Pollard - even though Mozart would prefer the useless Steyn's at flyhalf.   
Be it as it may - the total age of the players is 441 years - with an average age of 29,4 years.   If some of Mozart's favourites are selected the age will definitely exceed 30 years on average.   
Where Mozart gets his 28,2 average from is basically a distortion aimed at misleading members.   Don't be daft Mozart, you can't possibly calculate an average....hell I'm sure you cannot add.    
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
07 Jan 2015, 13:44
#42
07 Jan 2015, 13:44#42
 Pietersen is our 13? Is Louw among our starting loose trio? Mayfield's age will spike the average, as will Jean. Overall the age f the side won't be a problem. And if you want to change it for youth, you'd have to replace Jean with Frans, drop our best winger, drop our best 9, drop our only tighthead, drop our best lock. You really don;t have much of an argument. In fact, you only re-enforce the belief that experience is more important.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 Jan 2015, 14:29
#43
07 Jan 2015, 14:29#43
 Letsallbemorons
That is the team that Mozart - your fellow moron - is suggesting for the WC.   Matfield is useless and does not deserve to be anywhere near the team since he sabitages the Tight 5.   Jean was below par in 2014 - compared to 2013 - and Frans is utterly useless (was that in 2013 and 2014 in Super 15)  and for the rest of your comments you are supporting the same lot that cost us dearly in the 2011 WC and will be losers in 2015. 
Experience without performance on high level is an abomination in team sport and that was always the case.      
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
08 Jan 2015, 15:27
#44
08 Jan 2015, 15:27#44
 Who cost us in the 2011 WC? Lambie, who blew the winning try. Butch at 12 was a problem against Wales, and Bakkies' injury. Smit al, the seniors with the exception of Jean were magnificent. In fact our chances dwindled when Frans was injured. With him at 12 we looked contenders. No Michael. Your bleatings have already been debunked. Nothing you speak is the truth. Nothing. If you had your way, we'd end up worse than in 2002/2003. Oh, and Michael. Frans was excellent in 2013 and 2014. He particularly carried that Sharks team on his back to the playoffs. And I loved your contradiction in the "keep to the stats because that's where you cannot be faulted" nonsense when Frans' 2013 stats were actually not bad. But then we are dealing with the same person who said video evidence is a wild fabrication of the truth. So you won't accept anything so long as it doesn't fit your preconceptions. I also loved the 2005 England test that Du Preez lost, you DEFINITELY saw it because you had a sick relative you visited that time.  Blew up in your face, and the video of England's 2004 tries proved you wrong! Spectacular. You have no credibility bub.

This is your cue to throw insults around as per the norm. Your bread and butter gameplan.
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
08 Jan 2015, 17:35
#45
08 Jan 2015, 17:35#45
Retrogression has resulted by conservative coach's short term vision...we now have a huge problem with players way beyond sell by dates and some starting to approach those dates...panic syndrome to kick in...just watch it...this is always detrimental on younger players...HM lacks long term vision...he has some strengths but I believe his planning for the WC and future of SA rugby will go through a big dip before recovery.

I really wonder what the players really think deep in their hearts...these things are only truly known by close and trusted friends of the players and their close families...

love to a fly on the wall in some of their homes...
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news