Pathetic attempt to cite Richie M'cCaw....

 mate with all due respect he ran towards louw even though the ball was being runned towards the other side. so that line of running does not make sense other than he wanted to catch louw with the elbow....one can see the blood to start to trickle after the hit on his face.
no need for that in the game and no need for it from a legend like mccaw

 ..he ran directly  towards Louw cos Louw had the ball didn't he?...looked pretty innocuous to me... but if people want to make out there was intent to injure then good luck trying to prove it was anything more than accidental..

 mate i am not wearing my boks blinkers at all but to be frank it looked pretty sneaky to me.....the ball was out and he did not change his course at all

 ...yea well I haven't got my AB blinkers on either but the more I look at it , the more it looks like Louws trying to bite his elbow..

...but jokes aside, all the forums I've read are just passing it off as typical British trashy tabloid reporting..was just unfortunate Louw was getting to his feet as Richie was going past - purely accidental...Richie has no worries whatsoever.. 

 <iframe src="https://vine.co/v/eVU11hDU7a7/embed/simple" width="600" height="600" frameborder="0"></iframe><script src="https://platform.vine.co/static/scripts/embed.js"></script>

 Nah. He won't be cited. That citing commissioner knows that you do not cite Richie McCaw and get away with it. 

I would say that was most likely an accident. It happens so quick. Mccaw probably would, have missed him, but cut inwards as the Boks moved forward past the ruck.

 It is not a Tabloid, he had no reason to run around that side and certainly should not have been running so close to the players on the ground; he struck him in the head either by accident or design and only he knows the answer to that. But the fact remains, why was he taking the long way round to get to the ball in the first place ?!  
And I doubt he will be cited, regardless of the intent or no. 

 Case closed


http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/...-illusion-there-is-no-elbow-from-richie-mccaw

 
McCaw has never been a dirty player and I can't see him starting now.

Leave him be.

He has one more match to play before he retires.

It would be tragic to see him suspended for the final.

 Its just another sad old used-ta-be but not much of anything these days squeazer like brian moore trying to be relevent .What ,are we to sink to the low ,low standards of wussiness as espoused by the round ball gits ?

Clearly no elbow, just his hip hitting Louw's shoulder if anything.

 You've got to be kitting me, that's nothing, incidental contact at best. Talk about a vendetta to get McCaw this is ridiculous. Let's see what this idiots in the citing commission do, nothing would surprise me.

 You will notice that A. Smith gets a boot /knee to his back from a Bok player in the same clip. Incidental contact both "incidents". Let it drop.

 Hah going on this nonsense plenty of ladies and laddettes at the boxing day sales will be getting cited too !