FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SA Depth worries Matfield

SA Depth worries Matfield

Started by clevermike11 REPLIES312 VIEWS· 18 May 2015, 13:25
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 May 2015, 13:25
#1
18 May 2015, 13:25#1

This from news24:-


 "With Super Rugby set to expand to 18 teams, former Springbok coach Nick Mallett says the lack of depth in South African rugby is worrisome.   Mallett was speaking in the SuperSport studio on Saturday night following a dismal weekend for South African teams.


All four teams competing lost, with the Bulls going down to the Blues in Auckland (23-18), the Sharks losing to the Waratahs in Sydney (33-18), the Lions undone by the Brumbies in Johannesburg (30-20) and the Cheetahs thumped by the Highlanders in Bloemfontein (45-24).


From next year, the Kings will join the other South African franchises in an expanded tournament and Mallett fears there is not enough players of quality currently plying their trade in the country.


Mallett said: “The Lions have played above themselves and have played incredibly well to be where they are. Given the way the Cheetahs performed in this game, how on earth are the Kings going to compete next year?


“Where are they going to find the players? It's a big concern for 2016. We're going to have an extra Super Rugby franchise and we've got 350 professional rugby players competing overseas.”


The Sharks has shown us the way - just take the rejects from the Foreign Clubs back and offer them a contract.   Stick with the geriatrics and everything will be fine.   

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
18 May 2015, 13:45
#2
18 May 2015, 13:45#2
 Is it too late to say no to another SA Team?
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
18 May 2015, 13:47
#3
18 May 2015, 13:47#3

Truth be told it has very little to do with it being just another SA Team.


 

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
18 May 2015, 13:49
#4
18 May 2015, 13:49#4
 Maybe if the 6th SA Team can play Japan and Argentina and then the winner plays the Blues or the Lions to get in
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
18 May 2015, 15:35
#5
18 May 2015, 15:35#5
We normally have two teams that are nothing more than cannon fodder, and now we will just have a third one! A pie is only so big, if one cuts more slices out of that pie, the pieces are just going to be smaller. Its not rocket science!
The big unions will simply buy the best players, and remain pretty much where they are. The bottom three will land up with the scraps, and will get their bums handed to them with embarrassing regularity!    
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
18 May 2015, 16:06
#6
18 May 2015, 16:06#6
The ANC will not understand, cannot understand, that the smallest ethnic group in SA is the one who provides good quality rugby stock. You can include the entire population of Asia into our playing pool, taking our numbers to nearly a third of planet earth and the Afrikaaner still reigns supremem. But the ignorant stooges who only know how to instigate strife and destriction reckon that greater numbers mean there must be more numbers of black South Africans. If this was Ghana, Kenya or Ivory Coast it would be much easier to get those numbers, but it isn't. The black South Africans even struggle to assert themselves physically in football. To the point where their quite high level of technical ability is smothered out of games. But now they are to dominant in one of the two most physical sports in the world? It is a flawed approach, and enter the Kings. They will be a total waste of time and a burden on other teams. I say a burden because they will have increased the fixture list of an already over-bloated competition.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,285 posts
18 May 2015, 16:12
#7
18 May 2015, 16:12#7
Matfield on the brain! . It is Mal lett, not Matfield!
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,285 posts
18 May 2015, 16:16
#8
18 May 2015, 16:16#8
@Lestat. What crap are you driveling on about now? 
Bryan Habana is not Afri-kaans and he has probably been our best player in the professional era. 
Percy Montgomery is not Afri-kaans either- and neither is Bob Skinstad or your hero Lambie.
Out of the millions of Afri-kaans players- we have an unlimited supply of loose forward ball carriers.  
Although very few of the backline players in SA know how to pass-  or run with the ball in 2 hands that will at least give the opportunity for passing. 

OI
oimateyPro1,870 posts
18 May 2015, 16:28
#9
18 May 2015, 16:28#9
Mallett the Mouth is starting to grow tiresome, and honestly his credentials are far from untouchable - a question of what have you done for me lately?
Bulls were a disappointment but the rest of the teams lost to very good competition. Waratahs, Highlanders and Brumbies all coming off tough motivating losses and had something to prove and the SA teams ran into a buzz saw.



CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 May 2015, 16:44
#10
18 May 2015, 16:44#10
 Sorry about the heading - the comments came from Mallett.   Matfield would never make such comments - because he is the chief geriatric in SA rugby and by far the worst one.   Perhaps I am wrong - he is egocentric and would never admit his deficiencies.   
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
18 May 2015, 18:38
#11
18 May 2015, 18:38#11
Sharkbok, Habana is two things: 1.Coloured, 2.Not the entire Bantu population of South Africa. There are always exceptions to the rules. Fact of the matter is, the Afrikaans population give us our competitive edge, without that South Africa would never have been a superpower to begin with.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
21 May 2015, 14:10
#12
21 May 2015, 14:10#12
 "Percy Montgomery is not Afri-kaans either- and neither is Bob Skinstad or your hero Lambie." really Sharkbok?
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news