Sack Meyer now

 Dave 
For your info - a comment from a person who write a comment on a report attributed to Meyer:-
"I will say it again HM is now starting to fall apart,   He had 4 years to prepare now he wants to test depth in a World cup year,  Sorry that should have happened two years ago and everyone with half a rugby brain knows that. The AB's have at least 3 players per position,  That is how you win world cups.  To make an excuse that inexperience cost us, is hiding the fact that he is planless, and he made a mistake taking crucial players off in key positions. After yesterday I am sorry to say we will not win the world cup - not with HM in charge we won't."

 
Same thing I've been saying all along.

4 years wasted on the Bulls and the elderly.

 Yep Mike that bloke is spot on

Well, the popular calls were not so good. Where are Taute, Goosen, JJ, Bekker, Kruger, Vermaak, Coenie, Keegan, Werner, Mvovo, Cilliers, Potgieter, Jantjies, van Zyl, Britz now? What of Lambie, Reinach, Damian, JP at 13, Cornal? Face it, the fans picks are flubs. 

 Its elephants man

Dave - don't worry.
Bear in mind that this Disastrous fool who now claims he is somewhere in a Desert - but has been a Village Idiot despite changing his user name every second month after disgracing himself thoroughly - thinks -
*  that Morne Steyn is a top flyhalf, Juan de Jongh is tops  and Kirchner is world class; and*  that SB Williams and Folau are not up to standard.
That tells you what an idiot we have here - who lies about what happens on the field of play and blames certain players for everything.    Remember the time when he blamed De Allende for failing in a match that never took place and how he blamed Lambie for a try scored after a penalty line kick missed finding touch by Morne in the Perth test.  Also how he lied about Francois Steyn when De Allende played the fool with him.
So what can one expect from such a piss pot thinker?   
Others cannot help him even though they may try de sperately to do so.   

You are a joke and just fabricated an entire narrative. I never blamed Damian for a game that never took place, you just didn't read properly! LMAO! 
As per Lambie? Yes I didn't blame him, because Kuridrani ran into the space he created by shooting out of line to take a player out off the ball. Kuridrani scored because Lambie exposed that channel. Simples. 
Everything I said about Damian's encounter was verified by video and accurate. You are just upset because you hounded me to look at that game and it did not turn out as you said. 
I said Folau cannot clear his lines can get trapped trying to run it back. I said he was lacking pace relative to the faster wings in world rugby. The Aussie media say the same thing. England, New Zealand, Ireland, France, South Africa all profited by pressuring him. He is a fine playmaker with flaws. 
Kirchner is a fine 15, and Morné is a record breaker and match winner. Again, this is common knowledge to all but the most hardened pseudo Bok fan.
You are still seething after Goosen, Plisson, Lambie, Jantjies and Swiel - your pick - flopped. You even snubbed Pollard initially! 
Then there were your bleatings in 2013: the Boks will never score tries with Morné. Yet they emphatically did. So you proceed to label those wins as moral loses! Some supporter. You are shameful. 

 What a clown we have here - the supreme idiot at work  - who do not care about being a liar as well.  The incident of the Reds game that never took place happened exactly as I said and he then went ahead and changed the posting reflecting the Rebels instead of the Reds as stated originally.   I expected that from the low-life and copied the original message and posted it after the change.
WE have to accept that we deal here with a prejudiced fool.  By the way I would rather be a "blind cripple" than the  total liar you are.   In the past two weeks the crescendo of lies by your fellow Village Idiot has reached manic proportions and you call that a basis for being knocked from pillar to post.
I pity you - it is so hard to be a low life.     .  

 You would rather be a blind cripple than a liar? You are most likely all three! But a liar you are for certain. Exposed time and again.