FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Saffex - Earl Silky Hands Jantjies

Saffex - Earl Silky Hands Jantjies

Started by clevermike48 REPLIES1,777 VIEWS· 01 Apr 2013, 21:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:15
#1
01 Apr 2013, 21:15#1

Saffex

I am not finished withyou about the above so-called fly half,  Let me quote some of your brilliant comments on Earl Silky Hands:-

"At least the kid is rugby player, has good hands, good feet and an eye for a gap. The only thing Morne has is a boot, no skill at all.

Jantjies is a class act and Mike you are delusional if you conclude that he failed against NZ - in fact you will find that every report on his performance against NZ was positive."

----------------------------------------------------------

"Mike you are out of touch with reality. Jantjies sorted out his defensive issues some time back - his defence has been damn good for some time now.

He remains one of our best attacking/creative flyhalves in SA and has a damn good boot on him. He will thrive for the Stormers this year and cement his place in the Bok squad".

----------------------------------------------------------

"I dont care at what level Joel played for that does not entitle him to conclude that Jantjies skills are manufactured when it is clear that its instinctive. If Joel did say this then he is a bloody fool.

As for his defence, its a given fact that it improved markedlyl last year and one or two missed tackles dont define a player for crying out loud. Provide stats that confirm he missed as many tackles as you claim in 2012. I dispute it."

"When it comes to Jantjies, you speak a load of crap and I'm going to enjoy rubbing your nose in it this year"

-------------------------------------------

Now lets get back to this season.   Jantjies had two iffy and average games and three disaters,   He has good hands and feet - but that deserted him competely in the few games he played in this year.  Knocking ons and charge down kicks is dealt with  by the simple description "it happems".  Sure it happens to the seond team flyalf of Witgatwortekfontein - not on this level - or it is supposed not to happen when Jantjies made it his stock in trade.

His disastrous performances cost the Stormers at least three of the five games they played in this year.   Are you enjoying it as I rub you nose in the shit Jantjies produced thus far this season?

 

 

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:24
#2
01 Apr 2013, 21:24#2

Look here you ignorant twit, he had a poor game on Sat, at least I am man enough to admit that. But lets be realistic here, the only reason he looked bad was because he dropped two balls, one was passed way above his head.

 

Those dropped passes and charge down made him look bad, when in reality the rest of his game was fine. He tackled well and was no worse than Morne or Francis in general play.

 

He was solid in the games prior to this and was SA's best 10 last week. One poor game does not make him a crap player, you thick prick

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:35
#3
01 Apr 2013, 21:35#3

Saffex

Keep on dreaming about how good the idiot was on Saturday,  And you can be assured I enjoy the rubbing nose in it part.   Earl Silky Hand never had a good game this year.   A did a few good things in games this year - but cancelled out those good things with bad plays the rest of the same games.

Hell I cannot believe that you still believe in Jantjies as a suitable player on Super 15 level and that :it happens: cancel out all his deficiencies.

I think a one-way ticket to Johannesburg is the only way out in this case,

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:44
#4
01 Apr 2013, 21:44#4

Jantjies had a great game against the Brumbies - FACT. Damn right I rate this kid, he is a class act. One average game does not define him.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:55
#5
01 Apr 2013, 21:55#5

Saffex

You surely mean one average game - and four poor games in this case.   back to Johannesburg to play Vodacom Rugby for this one.  The Stormers cannot afford further disasters.

If he plays on Saturday Labuschagne and Brussow would have a field day and Useless De Jong would not be able to kill off the backline moves that would follow those two.  A loss in Bloemfontein in that case is highly likely.

But then - I am not a Stormers fan and do not care what really happen to that hapless team.  As an SA supporter = the disaters hurt badly.  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Apr 2013, 21:55
#6
01 Apr 2013, 21:55#6

Saffex

You surely mean one average game - and four poor games in this case.   back to Johannesburg to play Vodacom Rugby for this one.  The Stormers cannot afford further disasters.

If he plays on Saturday Labuschagne and Brussow would have a field day and Useless De Jong would not be able to kill off the backline moves that would follow those two.  A loss in Bloemfontein in that case is highly likely.

But then - I am not a Stormers fan and do not care what really happen to that hapless team.  As an SA supporter = the disaters hurt badly.  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
01 Apr 2013, 22:07
#7
01 Apr 2013, 22:07#7

No DomMike he started with a solid game, got better each week, culminating in a great game against the Brumbies.....he let himself and his team down on Sat

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 00:31
#8
02 Apr 2013, 00:31#8

Saffex

Your idea about solid games are warped - especially when it concerns players like Jantjies, Steyn and Hougaard.

Just one question that baffled me all along.   Steyn was grossly overweight, slow and unfit when he joined the Sharks in January - 118 kgs.   He got down to 114 kgs and was not fit as well at the time of the game against the Stormers - he eventually got to 110 kgs - when it was evident that he could not continue as center anymore.   How could there have been a drop in form and fitness later in the series when his weight got down to 110 kgs.    If he ws unfit at 110 kgs - it stands to reason that he was even more so at 114 kgs.   How did you get to his sudden drop in form after the Stormers game?   Please explain bearing in mind the porky situation.  .  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 00:59
#9
02 Apr 2013, 00:59#9

 Mike get this into your stupid head, I had no issue with Frans's form at all. He was good in his first two games and then slipped along with the whole of the Sharks side in the next two games.

 

Anyone pointing fingers at Frans alone has to be an ignorant twit. I would NEVER have left Frans out of the side in favour of the useless Bosman. But if Plum said he needed conditioning then fair enough.......but that still would not have stopped me selecting Frans at 12, given I would NEVER select Bosman there.

 

Had Whitehead been fit, I would have given Frans the week off. Frans was no better or worse than his team mates against the Kings and the Brumbies - FACT.

 

But you are far too stupid to comprehend all these facts. You in fact told us how great Bosman was, when in fact he did stuff all, which you had to admit after you second viewing - you know stuff all DomMike

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 01:12
#10
02 Apr 2013, 01:12#10

Saffex

It really is amazing - Steyn at 114 kgs was fit and at 110 kgs he needs conditioning,   His contribution to games killed the backline all along and it was evident in the Kings test that the backline functioned better without him.   The same can be said of the Brumbies game - after his replacement the functioning of the backline was much better and he Sharks clawed back at least a try after he stopped crashballing.  

The Sharks played a different rgame against the Rebels and at least Bosman made a positive contribution to one try scored and also converted the tries after Lambie missed penalties,    Bosman in fact had a good passing game - mostly back to the loosies.  Steyn crashballed and if he ever passed balls,  the defenders were on top of the recipients - because Steyn was so slow off the mark and his rare  passing was also slow 

Please accept that his days of playing at center is done and dusted.   He has just too many negatives to even be a remote consideration.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 15:54
#11
02 Apr 2013, 15:54#11

DomMike, do you think that by lying, that your argument would carry more weight? Where did you suck 114kg from?

 

Bosman was bloody useless in a one sided game. You salivating over his passing to forwards as testament to a good performance is a laugh. Talk about clutching at straws. Bosman was kak as he is a kak player, always has been, always will be.

 

So according to you Frans's days as a centre are done - wow where did you drag that shit from. I'll be reminding you of this ignorant declaration the next time he turns out at 12 for the Boks.

 

DomMike, Frans will be the Bok 12 and Jean will be the 13........its a given

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 16:18
#12
02 Apr 2013, 16:18#12

Saffex

OK - let me explain again.   Plumtree said that Steyn was 118kgs when he joined the team in January.   In early February I went to the game in Pietermaritzburg and a guy sitting near us when we discussed Steyn said he was weighing 115 kgs.   A month later Plumtree said he now was weighing 110 kgs.   What did he way in the first game against the Cheetahs?    My estimate of 114 kgs was generous - he probably was 115 to 116 kgs.  He defiitely did no come down by 8 kgs in one month - that is for bloody sure.

Ok - I won't be able to do anything if Meyer is so stupid to select Steyn at 12 again - but I will be free to say one clear thing:-

"Welcome back - dead Springbok backline".   and I would be realsitic and expect nothing from that backline at all.

Let me be explicit too - since the fat, unift, slow and useless Francois Steyn returned from France - he was a kak player - I was severly disappointed to see what he really produced and has given up hope on the bugger.

   

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 17:07
#13
02 Apr 2013, 17:07#13

Mike stop speaking kak, you were telling us how good Frans was looking in those warm up games......he carried that form into his first two S15 games of the season. In week 1 he was named in the SA side of the week. In week 2 he was named in the S15 side of the week, which included all the sides......he was good in those first two games - FACT

 

Meyer and Plum have enough brains to invest in the class of Frans at 12.......we need to see a fit Frans beating the defender, taking contact and offloading like he did in that first S15 game of the year - it was perfect

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 17:44
#14
02 Apr 2013, 17:44#14

Saffex

I think Plumtree found out what Steyn is producing and we will see how he handles Steyn in future.

Now back to Earl Silky Hands Jantjies.   I looked at those two knock-ons again.   Jantjies saw the approaching defenders and was expecting a really hard tackle.  The little coward panicked and knocked on the ball as a result.  Class Act that one!!!!!!!

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 17:49
#15
02 Apr 2013, 17:49#15

One of those passes to Jantjies was piss poor, it was way over his head. He should have taken it, but it was still a crap pass. Duvehage was crap, Groom should have started

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 18:03
#16
02 Apr 2013, 18:03#16

Saffex

Crap - the first pass was about neck high - not way over his head.   The lttle coward saw the defenderders coming and the knock-on was inevitable.  

OK - next defence is here.  We are now past the "it happens" stageand has reached the 'blame any other player stage" of dicussions

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 18:06
#17
02 Apr 2013, 18:06#17

Crap it was above his head. He dropped two balls it happens, the rest of his game was fine. He was no better or worse than players like Joe, de Jongh or Duvenhage on the day

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Apr 2013, 18:22
#18
02 Apr 2013, 18:22#18

Saffex

I did say I can give you the name of a good opticiam - but he is in SA.  Is there any in England - you need urgent help in seeing reality.

 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Apr 2013, 21:56
#19
02 Apr 2013, 21:56#19

 My eyes are spot on, they told me Jantjies was no worse or better than Duvenhage, de Jongh, Aplon or Joe on the night - FACT

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Apr 2013, 00:23
#20
03 Apr 2013, 00:23#20

Saffex

Elswhere I gave the info on the work rate of players in the Cheetahs back row - especially the flanks.   A bloke like Labuschagne did more tackles than was done by the two Stormer flanks combined amd he had more turnovers than the Stormers flanks combined did.

The Cheetahs knows Jantjies inside out and they are going to exploit his weaknesses continuously.  WE will see more knock-ons on Saturday than the past Saturday and more attacks in the channel than in all previous games.  Jantjies will crack again - like he did so often this year and we can continue the discussion next week.

Irrespective of what you say - Jantjies remains the worst flyhalf in Super 15 this year and it will be proven again on Saturday.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Apr 2013, 10:03
#21
03 Apr 2013, 10:03#21

The chances of Jantjies knocking the ball on again is about a big fat zero. Jantjies was our BEST 10 in the week the Stormers played the Brumbies - FACT

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Apr 2013, 12:20
#22
03 Apr 2013, 12:20#22

Saffex

"So toe soos 'n klei-os se gat"  - that description fits you 100%.   Can you not see and underatnd that Jantjies knocks on balls - drops them to the ground or just chickens out - when he sees he is going to be tackled hard.   That is why he stands deeper in the channel than your celebrated friend Morne Steyn.   The Cheetahs are not going to be kind to that little coward - believe me.

Thw Cheetahs loosies - especially Labuschagne - is going to target him and carry him back - holding the ball off the ground for 10 meters thus affecting a turnover or penalty and - if not - he will be tackled hard.  The end result woud be the chicken will knock on the ball out of  sheer cowradice and then the Stormers players will do what the Springboks did in the Sowet test - ignore him on the field of play and not pass balls to him.  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Apr 2013, 13:17
#23
03 Apr 2013, 13:17#23

DomMike, Jantjies has only dropped two balls to date, one of which was a damn poor pass from his 9, that was way over his head.

 

If Jantjies was a chicken, the Saders and Brumbies would have penetrated his channel and taken him out. Fact is the little man put his body on the line and took the knocks. Thats called bravery

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,230 posts
12 Jul 2017, 00:53
#24
12 Jul 2017, 00:53#24
Most of us wrote Jantjies off, especially after his stay at the Stormers. But he has become one of our key players now
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jul 2017, 01:18
#25
12 Jul 2017, 01:18#25
Well most of us had our doubts, but as usual there was one brain dead fool who couldn't even see the debate...haha. Earl silky brain Tokkie.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jul 2017, 01:18
#26
12 Jul 2017, 01:18#26
Well most of us had our doubts, but as usual there was one brain dead fool who couldn't even see the debate...haha. Earl silky brain Tokkie.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
12 Jul 2017, 07:41
#27
12 Jul 2017, 07:41#27
 Haha No doubt Jantjies will make one mistake against New Zealand and he'll yet again be called a Super Rugby player at best.
If he's a SR player then all our other 10s are CC quality
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jul 2017, 07:53
#28
12 Jul 2017, 07:53#28
 The doos at it again and dredging  up a thread  from 2013.   He does not realize that I assess players on form and Jantjies had a horror year in 2013 playing for the Stormers.
He has had better performances since - so I changed my mind about him.  
Mozart is brain dead and does not change his mind ever,   He is not above a 180 degree change himself - but others are constantly reminded about what they wrote in the past.The man is worthy of being ignored - he is a prime BSter.     
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jul 2017, 07:53
#29
12 Jul 2017, 07:53#29
 The doos at it again and dredging  up a thread  from 2013.   He does not realize that I assess players on form and Jantjies had a horror year in 2013 playing for the Stormers.
He has had better performances since - so I changed my mind about him.  
Mozart is brain dead and does not change his mind ever,   He is not above a 180 degree change himself - but others are constantly reminded about what they wrote in the past.The man is worthy of being ignored - he is a prime BSter.     
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
12 Jul 2017, 08:43
#30
12 Jul 2017, 08:43#30
 Actually that's nonsense Mike
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
12 Jul 2017, 09:07
#31
12 Jul 2017, 09:07#31
 
Jantjies is a man that's struggled with consistency. His confidence levels soar one moment and plummet 5 minutes later.

I have seen him mess up a 30m shot at poles under pressure with a kick that was easily 10m short.

He is by no means within the top 20 flyhalves in the world. What he is, is one of our top 3 best flyhalves at the moment and we have no choice but to slot him in for the coming RC.

He has managed to gather a bit of confidence against the French. We will soon see if he's managed to hang onto it.

 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jul 2017, 15:01
#32
12 Jul 2017, 15:01#32
CC name 20 better flyhalves than Jantjies  
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,230 posts
12 Jul 2017, 16:39
#33
12 Jul 2017, 16:39#33
Jantjies is, without a doubt, our best flyhalf. He is a key man for the Lions and the Boks.If he gets injured, I am not sure who will step in. Pollard seems very sluggish of late. 
Probably the wrong conditioning programme at the Bulls have turned him into a forward. Mitchell will have him sweating out the excess muscle with long runs and sprints, instead of juicing it up in the gym. 
Frans Steyn is a completely different player- so this would not work. 

He was totally useless when at the Stormers, but that was following a brainless 10 man game plan.  
Most of our coaches can only understand a Morne Steyn game plan.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jul 2017, 16:59
#34
12 Jul 2017, 16:59#34
Actually Tokkie if you engage the remnants of your brain you'll see Sharkbok brought back the thread.....how embarrassing.
AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
12 Jul 2017, 19:28
#35
12 Jul 2017, 19:28#35
Sure Jantjies had three average games against the French....but let's wait and see how he does against the OZ and AB's before anointing him as the chosen one. 
I am prepared to give him credit for an outstanding SR season but I still have my concerns about him being the SA fly-half savour.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
12 Jul 2017, 20:04
#36
12 Jul 2017, 20:04#36
 AJ did you forget about Jantjies being our best 10 in the two seasons before 2017?
In some years we might have better but not any time soon. Same with Whitely, same with Skosan and and and.
We all recognise the ABs as our big foe yet fail to give credit to the only ten in SA who has performed admirably against Kiwi opposition lately. But of a double standard really.
We have some exciting young prospects though and I for one am very happy that they'll be learning from a creative playmaker like Jantjies. 
Why did Cronje suddenly start playing so differently of late? My guess is that he it's because he saw the success Jantjies is having. 
I'll go one further and say th at in years to come we'll probably see a lot more creative tens coming through and a large part of the credit for that should go directly to Jantjies and the Lions.
AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
12 Jul 2017, 20:20
#37
12 Jul 2017, 20:20#37
All that ranting and raving about Jantjies from my B-IL and you Plum will disappear the first time Jantjies gets a big hit.
Jantjies is petrified when facing a good strong test side. He has failed time and time again and will continue to fail against a strong side for the one simple reason....scared.
Sure he has played against the NZ Super teams and done fairly well but the test will come when he faces a test team who have him on the back foot.
He is not Spencer or Wilkie irrespective of what all his supporters suggest.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
12 Jul 2017, 20:57
#38
12 Jul 2017, 20:57#38
 AJ all I can say is that you have intelligent genes in your family. Your sister should be given credit for choosing a good husband
Jokes aside. Do we have another ten would do better when a team has him on the back foot? Aside from some promising youngsters, I can't think of a single one. 
AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
12 Jul 2017, 23:18
#39
12 Jul 2017, 23:18#39
Well, Plum u now have two Vaalies who are on your side...my sister and her husband.
With the head she has on her shoulders why she selected a guy from the Transvaal (Jeppe) Lord alone knows.
I like one or two younger flyhalves (Bosch for example) yet they are unproven but I must admit that the ex-Sharks flyhalf plying his skills in PE has caught my attention.
But we will have to wait for the RC and then re-evaluate the situation. 
 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jul 2017, 23:24
#40
12 Jul 2017, 23:24#40
Good civilized debate.
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Rugby