FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  SANZAR 'invites' Hoskins to talk; Rugby 365

SANZAR 'invites' Hoskins to talk; Rugby 365

Started by Just_win3 REPLIES930 VIEWS· 14 Apr 2015, 19:06
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
14 Apr 2015, 19:06
#1
14 Apr 2015, 19:06#1

SANZAR has tactfully sidestepped the latest attack on their integrity, telling South African Rugby Union President Oregan Hoskins to "follow the proper channels" if he has grievances.

Hoskins, in a report published in a weekend newspaper, launched a scathing attack on SANZAR, the organisation that controls Southern Hemisphere competitions - Super Rugby and the Rugby championship.

The SARU boss took aim at what he regards as "the inconsistency of recent rulings at disciplinary tribunals" and also targeted SANZAR Chief Executive Greg Peters.

However, the SANZAR boss remained mum on the matter.

Instead a spokesperson said Hoskins is welcome to contact them to raise his concerns.

"Hoskins is aware of the correct channels to air his concerns," a SANZAR spokesperson told rugby365.

"He [Hoskins] is certainly welcome to use them should he wish to receive clarification on these matters."

According to the report in the City Press newspaper Hoskins was incensed by what he believed to be the unfair handling of cases involving South African players compared with their New Zealand and Australian counterparts.

He referred to the recent harsh bans handed to Bismarck du Plessis (four weeks), Frans Steyn (five weeks) and Jean Deysel (seven weeks)  while similar offences by Kiwi and Aussie players received more lenient treatment.

Hoskins said he "had enough" and was at his "wits end".

Hoskins said he had called a meeting with key figures in judicial and disciplinary structures, where he intended to make his dissatisfaction known.

These figures included Justice Lex Mpati, head of both SARU and SANZAR judicial committees, head of referees André Watson and citing commissioner Freek Burger.

"I'm so incensed, absolutely frustrated, and the public is outraged," Hoskins told the City Press.

"I was a judicial officer; I was a citing commissioner, I know the drill.

"I studied the laws; wrote the exams; it's not like I'm standing in judgement as a layman," added an angry Hoskins.

By Jan de Koning

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
14 Apr 2015, 19:08
#2
14 Apr 2015, 19:08#2
 Ok, Hoskins has sounded off in the press, let's see if anything comes of it. I would be glad if this & kiwi concerns result in a more transparent & consistent result when it comes to these rulings.
Care must be taken not to encourage the paranoid conspiracy theory chaps - of which there are a few
           
No worries though as Kiwis are on the case:




BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
15 Apr 2015, 08:56
#3
15 Apr 2015, 08:56#3
Agreed JW, all I want to see is consistency! When your team is beaten it is disappointing, but that is part of sport, but when a team or player is unfairly impacted because of bias, incompetence etc it is more than disappointing, it is an insult to both that team (or player) and the sport. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Apr 2015, 15:08
#4
15 Apr 2015, 15:08#4
 I think Hoskins is going the right way at present - first get the input from the local professionals involved and than take up the matter with Sanzar.   
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news