So much for the Brumbies not dominating the breakdown

"Coetzee admitted that the Brumbies simply outplayed his side, outscoring them by six tries to one by taking their opportunities and dominating the breakdown."

From a parallel universe where up is down, Dave eschews the coach's admission and asserts the following fantasy
 Saffex 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 12658RE: Sormers little men get slapped
June 22, 2015, 17:58:47

Utter rubbish who beat him at the breakdown then......name the players......what utter crap.

Kolisi was the second best loosie on the field in that game....the best was the Brumbies 8. He never steps away from contact, that is a lie.

He secured as much ball as Po[removed] did but made more of an impression than Po[removed] did in the game. Kolisi was without doubt better than Po[removed] and that's a fact.

Kolisi never makes an impact in the line-outs, for he is not a 7's backside......only a complete fool like Coetzee would play Kolisi at 7 with Rhodes at 6.......mind blowing stuff.

Lets just have a look at Fardy for the Brumbies at blindside.....5 m gained, zero defenders beaten, 8 tackles made, zero missed.....Kolisi owned him.

•  0 Likes

Provide the stats which prove the Brumbies won the breakdown.....the fact that useless Coetzee concludes that very fact means sweet fuck all unless of course you rate Coetzee as a coach.......which no doubt you do given you think Matfield, de Jongh and Morne add value  

Waaaaaahahahahahahaha.....prove that I didn't think the Boks were going to lose when I said I wouldn't bet on them. Good old lawyerly Dave. 

So what I can gather from Dave is that the Stormers were either equal to or better than their B rumbies counterparts yet somehow got comprehensively outplayed. These are the delusions of people who are too emotional to draw logical conclusions.