FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Something to Watch for this Year

Something to Watch for this Year

Started by DezertFox7 REPLIES242 VIEWS· 10 May 2015, 17:10
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
10 May 2015, 17:10
#1
10 May 2015, 17:10#1
Last year I noticed how our flanks were not binding on at scrum time properly. They liked to do this 'meerkating' where they popped up searching for the ball and disengage as soon as possible. I'm no scrum expert, but I do realize that the flanks are required to generate that forward power. In fact, nearly everyone except Argentina were guilty of it last year! But this got lost in the battle over the locks and using Victor as the scapegoat. I wonder if this is a result of the cota gent that is Super rugby, where scrums are becoming more of a stop-gap for more meandering.... oops, I mean purposeful running at everything.


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
10 May 2015, 19:56
#2
10 May 2015, 19:56#2
 Are you really serious in what you are writing here?  I think you must be kidding since what you described is against the laws of rugby and when it does happen the loosies are blown up and a penalty given to the opposing team.  
You must be trying to find a reason for the fact that our scrumming is getting poorer and direct attention away for the critical poor support Matfield gives in scrums.   have fun in dreamworld.   
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 May 2015, 20:11
#3
10 May 2015, 20:11#3
 Geez ou Maaikie, do you really not understanding what Lestat is trying to say? Really?
A flanker standing next to a scrum with his arm "bound to a lock" as the law requires, is not necessarily scrumming. Especially if he has his head up and is looking around like a meerkat. 
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
10 May 2015, 20:37
#4
10 May 2015, 20:37#4
I've said it once and will say it again, reading comprehension. It makes all the difference. Fo seriazz G.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
10 May 2015, 22:10
#5
10 May 2015, 22:10#5
 bBoth the village idiots - I have seen what the second idiot described happening when the scrum has been formed and mostly when the point of going out of the scrum.  It is only idiots who believe loosies are their to make a strong contribution to scrumming.  
If they kept being bound to the scrum at that point - what happened to Alberts when Paige ran past him with only three meters space between the sideline and the scrum.  There is appoint where disengagement is necessary and does happen.
Meantime go and read up what contributions the two flank forwards make to scrumming - you may then find out the truth about the issue .     
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
10 May 2015, 22:45
#6
10 May 2015, 22:45#6
 @Ou Maaikie. "If they kept being bound to the scrum at that point - what happened to Alberts when Paige ran past him with only three meters space between the sideline and the scrum.  There is appoint where disengagement is necessary and does happen."

Well, there you have it. I am no scrum fundi, but you my friend, knows f@kol about scrums by the look of it. This is not the first time that you have hit your name with a train sleeper as far as the scrum is concerned. Before we deal with the flankers, may I remind you about some of your previous gaffs.

You once made the remark that we were scrumming badly and that you saw Beast crapping on VM because he was not giving any support. Hahaha. Yeah right. The next moment you tried to convince Moz that Beast's scrumming improved when Bakkies Botha was replaced. Only problem was that Bakkies was scrumming behind Jannie and VM was scrumming behind Beast. Yep. The poor scrumming was down to VM and Bakkkies. Nothing to do with the two props.

Then we had the Arg test in Arg where we were properly stuffed and this time around it was solely because of our crap props. Steenkamp was in place of Beast with Loodvoet behind him. The same Loodvoet who waved through the scrummie for a try in that game. The poor scrumming had nothing to do with Loodvoet this time. In addition, Jannie's poor scrumming was solely down to Jannie. Nothing to do with Eben Etzebeth behind him.

OK. Now the flankers and their role. If the flankers had no scrumming role but was there to guard the scrummie, like you seem to suggest, then WTF, would you say, do they need to pack in the scrum? The flanker has to roles. He has to scrum and help his team win the ball. If he is in the defending pack, he has to remain bound until the ball is out of the scrum and then he has to detach from the scrum asap to take up his defending role. Up to that timehe is supposed to be pushing in the scrum. The reason why has to stay fully bound is to make sure that they do not break up prematurely, i.e. before the ball is out of the scrum. Two descriptions of the role of the flankers:

Flanker is a position in the sport of rugby union. Each team of 15 players includes two flankers, who play in the forwards,[1] and are generally classified as either blindside or openside flankers, numbers 6 and 7 respectively. The name comes from their position in a scrum in which they 'flank' each set of forwards. They fight for the ball– most commonly in rucks and mauls. Flankers also assist in pushing in a scrum, but are expected to detach from the scrum as early as possible in order to get to the play before the opposition's forwards.

..and..

You push and provide some stability but your main responsibilities are elsewhere.

When a scrum forms it is rarely central in terms of distance from the touch-lines.

  • the narrow side is called the blind-side
  • the wide side is called the open side

Rugby flankers tend to specialise, with one blind-side flanker and one open-side flanker.

When the scrum forms they attach to the scrum on the appropriate side, blind or open.

When the opposition win the scrum they get the ball so your job as a flanker is to DEFEND.[note that only once the ball is out, do  they detach and start defending. Until that time  he is part of the scrum and is supposed to be scrumming]

The flankers must remain attached to the scrum until the ball comes out.

The blind-side flanker then breaks from the scrum and must stop any ball carrier from making ground down the blind side.


One last question, if the main role of the flanker is to defend on teh attacking scrummie, then WTF, in your opinion, is his role in an attacking scrum, i.e. when his own scrummie put s the ball in?


DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
11 May 2015, 10:52
#7
11 May 2015, 10:52#7
Trust Michael to turn a simple comment into something more tedious and drawn out, Strewth!!

In the diagram I made , I show the transference of force in a scrum. Contrary to popular opinion, the lock does not literally push behind the prop. He transfers force obliquely alongside the flank outside of him. Both locks will combine to transfer force through the hooker. That's why I wanted to bring the flanks into question, because if they are merely holding on whilst getting ready to disengage as soon as possible, they are not committing to the scrum effort. We don't just lose stability - the oblique force maintaining scrum integrity and shape - but we lose force. If you are going to bring the locks into question concerning scrum power then you need to bring the flank into question too! 

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
16 May 2015, 13:22
#8
16 May 2015, 13:22#8
 The reffing of Scrums and a Rolling Maul is such a lottery
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news