The height of hypocrisy

 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 16005RE: Odendaal vs JJ vs the absent Stepfontein
March 29, 2015, 03:04:13 Serfontein did not play - but this old imbecile makes comments on him - crazy but true.

•  0 people like this post

  
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 16005What have we seen today from the Stormers players?
April 03, 2015, 13:41:36

There can be no doubt about the following:-

1.   That Kitshoff is by some distance the best loose-head prop in SA at present

2.   That Koch is a top class tight-head by far better than Jannie du Plessis.

3.   That Etzebeth is coming back to form and a very good lock.

4.   That Burger had an exceptional game as a 7

5.   That De Allende is by some distance the best no 12 in SA at present.

Three other aspects were also clear.   The first one is the fact that Juan de Jongh was not there to destroy the Stormers backline and that he was not missed and should not play at 13 in future

 I don't get it Moz, where's the hypocrisy.  Mike is spot-ot-on.

Well, in the first post you see him attacking me for opining that Odendaal did better than Step had been doing.... on the basis that Step wasn't playing.

In the second post you see him opining that Jones did better than de Jongh has been doing...while De Jongh wasnt playing.

So one week  later he does exactly what he derided me for...even to the extent we are talking about centre replacements. Total hypocrisy.
By the way I obviously have no problem with comparisons between players playing on different days.

 SOP.

 Sorry Moz, I made a fool of myself. I did not see the opening post and thought your first reply on your own post was actually the OP. Read like that it makes no sense. I agree with the fact that our small back 3 plus De Jongh at 13 is a problem and it looked better with a bigger player at 13. I see the error in his logic for comparing players that did not play for one player and using the did not play as an excuse for another, but hypocrisy might be a bit too strong.

Will that dope Alistair Coetzee have learnt anything or is he under a quoata requirement in any case. It all makes no sense in terms of rugby.

 Mozart - the Village idiot
Despite you constant attacks on Serfontein he did not disgrace himself in previous matches.   I admitted that Odendaal  had a good match - but your constant attacks on Serfontein were BS you normally spread on this site to discredit the player.
The difference about De Jongh was starking.  He buggered up constantly in most matches he played in and was no asset to the Stormers.  That is factual.   All I said is he would not be missed in the game yesterday and he was not missed at all.   Jones in that game did a better job than De Jongh did in his previous game against the Highlanders - FACT.   
So here we have Serfontein - constantly and often enough falsely maligned by you - and De Jongh - a player often criticized by me for being a defensive liability bringing nothing to attacking play other than finishing off where others have done the work for him.
The difference is I have ample reason for my criticism and am not hesitant to use the ESPN stats to prove my point - your criticism of Serfontein is based on BS prejudice and bias with very little factual info to support your standard stories.
    

It's simple Moronic....you did exactly what you criticized me for....one week ago.  The quotes are there for every poster to see. Clean up your act you old duffer.