FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The players who are crucial to our WC

The players who are crucial to our WC

Started by Mozart1 REPLIES233 VIEWS· 30 Jul 2015, 00:07
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Jul 2015, 00:07
#1
30 Jul 2015, 00:07#1

Before last weekend, I'd have said Vermeulen tops the list....but Schalk demonstrated he can be a good alternative. So calling a player indispensable can be misleading. But this would be my list:

 

Willie....nobody else in South Africa is close in sparking the backline from deep.

 

Pollard....there isn't another flyhalf in the country with his balance of attributes.

 

Bismarck....once again our best hooker...and best fetcher....by a mile

 

 

Jannie...they come, they go....but Jannie is the only Bok tighthead who we know can do the business.

 

Etzebeth...he projects so much force, so widely.....every other 4 is a step down.

 

 

Schalk....we have loosies that try hard, but with Vermeulen gone, we have no other warrior with nous.

 

 

Other players may be important...Habana, Jean, the Beast and Matfield come to mind. But right now that list looks irreplaceable. So I would be very happy to see them avoid the Bargies. I' m not that concerned this week. But when the Bargies get home they are going to be loaded for Bear in the Big Apple.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Jul 2015, 04:55
#2
30 Jul 2015, 04:55#2
 Mozart
In the main I agree with you - bar the issue of Burger.  He is not a number 89 and made some errors in that position as was clearly stated in another threat.  Yes he is good as a 7 - but certainly is not remotely near Vermeulen as an 8.
Insofar as Jannie is concerned - lets hope he keeps the scrums stable, outside of scrumming he is worthless. 
Among the other players you say are important there are serious reservations about especially Matfield - he is doing way too much damage to our Tight 5 to be even a consideration.    Our Tight 5 will be important in the WC and Matfield has been proven in turning our Tight 5 into a Tight 4 situation.  Anyone believing otherwise must be blind to reality.  If he is in the team at all we will go one way - and that is down. 
A fit Jean may or may not be an advantage.  Jean in 2014 was not a patch on the player he was in 2013 and the question is after his horrible injury would he be the Jean of 2013 or the Jean of 2014?  If he is less than he was in 2014 - when he was average at best (both in attacking and defending play) - his return will not be in the interest of the team.  Hopefully he will get some playing time in the upcoming tests against Argentina and we may get an idea of what he is capable of at present.  If he shows the class he showed in 2013 - no problem - if not, we are in for  bad time with him in the team.   
Habana will have to up his game considerably from what it was in the last two tests to really make a positive contribution to our WC team.  Beast I have no problems with. 
Mozart - reputation players without performance is the downfall of any WC squad and that has been proven over and over again over the last 28 years.  S ome of the players mentioned by you can be classed as reputation players without the performance requirement being taken into account.      
               
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news