poi-e
If you believe 20% of what Cerdyne writes on this Board - YOU are delusional.
poi-e
I'm not wanting to buy into the nonsense that's going on but I will tell you that I've met Mike. I found him to be generous, down to earth and decent.
There is an element of truth in what he says about an agenda to disrupt this board, we've all witnessed visits from a stream of moles with that sole intent, furthermore some of the moles are permanent residents. I'll leave it at that, there is no need to fingerpoint anyone as we well know the board has faced every challenge thrown at it and guess what....it has not only survived, instead it has grown at a phenomenal rate.
Mikey, if you're reading this post, Chad won a G1 Race on a maiden!!!! Dad won a G1 race in Sydney a couple of weeks ago.....warms the cockles of my heart when SAFFAS do us proud.
Beenkop might have some strange outlooks, none more so than his take on Matfield. But one thing we can say about Beenkop, is that he is probably the most objective poster on this board. He is the one guy who will absorb the facts and pronounce his observations accordingly.
He is not an ignorant liar like our friend CHICKEN, who will read the facts on say a player like JJ, where clearly the stats prove that he had a better defensive record against NZ and Oz than Jean did this year and inform us that JJ is a poor defender. Beenkop took in the stats and declared that they were positive, which they are as stats don’t lie. Its this kind of observation that commands respect, not the continued bullshit written about JJ’s defence from the likes of CHICKEN shit.
Same can be said of CHICKEN shit when it comes to JJ with ball in hand. We keep hearing he needs space to operate in, that he is one dimensional and can’t put people into space. One counters this with his beating of Savea on the outside and putting Willie into space, his stepping of Cruden, his putting Willie into space on a second occasion in that very test, his putting Jean into space, his putting Kirchner away for a try, his 4 tries scored himself this year in 9 starts……….from this Beenkop declares that JJ has the X factor, which he has with ball in hand.
Good old CHICKEN shit asks what JJ has done all year. Now this moron is either braindead, has no regard for the word objective or is just another prejudicial prick. My guess it’s a combination of all three. Beenkop, I think its about time you took that worthless plank under your wing. His ignorance and stupidity started irritating me some time ago. His lying was the nail in the coffin.
Beenkop, either shoot the damn thing or educate it in the art of objectivity.
Beeno
There is no
doubt in my mind that Ceradyne is trying his old stunts on the
Supersport site - where his main objective is to try and cause extreme
discord amongst members of this site.
If by talking about the Supersport site, you are referring to the old one by run by Supersport (Multichoice) you are so far off the mark that it is unbelievable. If you are referring to the privately owned Supersupporter website, then you are just as far off the mark as well, because whatever you know about it has to be hearsay from disgruntled ex-members. Of those lot, the only one with sense is Mozart, and I am not saying that because he is my biggest buddy. We have in fact had major fall-outs but both of us have moved on and I would say that we have quite amicable discussions nowadays. I am not even going to go into what happened to whom. So, if Beeno and the mushroom man want to go dig at it again, they are welcome.
He appears to do so by cottoning onto a single statement - making all kinds of diversion tactics - but never really comes up with anything positive. He really never produce anything original about rugby issues.
I have not cottoned on to anything. I have only cottoned onto exposed BS and lies. Lengthy essays of the same old BS can hardly be described as original rugby issues, especially when they are littered with inaccuracies.
Where he does try and make comments - he normally produces a totally distorted situation. I can call up a large number of such situations - like a case where there was a discussion of Fourie's speed - where he comes up with a video on what he called the 2012 Try of the Year. Problem was the video showed a match between Wales and the Springboks and we al know that -
* there was no matches between Wales and the Springboks in 2012; and
* Fourie has not played for the Springboks in 2012.
Talk about cottoning onto something...... this is a fine example of how it is done. I have explained the typo in the above example. What is amazing is that you are stupid enough to bring up this particular example because it illustrates exactly how thick you really are. When I explained that it was a mistake, I referred you to the opening banner on the clip where it was explained exactly from which game it was taken. It was from the 2009 Try of the year and most knowledgeable people would know that that try by Fourie against the B & I Lions and that tour was in 2009. You, however, managed to see Percy Montgomery, passing to Fourie, in that clip? WTF? Percy Montgomery against the British and Irish Lions in 2009?
A
further beauty was that Monty kicked a ball followed up by Fourie -
which ultimately let to the scoring of the try. Now we all know that
Monty retired from international rugby in 2008 - so the whole statement
was in fact false. The excuse for the lie was that I said Fourie was
never a really speedy player - so he had to concoct a lie - to prove me
wrong - that is where he went wrong. I assume he was trying to convince
members that there is at present nothing wrong with the speed of Fourie - hence the lie about the 2012 non-existent match and the try of the year.
Assumption is the mother of all fuck-ups. You were the one who said that he
was never a speedy player, and that was what it was all about. The fact that
you said NEVER. I highlighted and typed it in upper case but you still made
your own assumptions. Typical.
Oh and then you persist with seeing Percy Montgomery in the clip. You were the one who mentioned Montgomery, not me.
I think it is best not to respond to most of his posts - since they are made only to cause trouble and discord between members and confine responses to the rare cases where he really is in fact making a rugby-related statement - as against the cases where his comments are aimed at causing a vendetta against members - or creating a situation where there are serious discord on this site.
Your problem with my posts is the fact that they expose your BS and lies. I
have told you often enough that if you have a point to make, then do not lie or
exaggerate. There are hordes of examples where you have resorted to this kind
of tactic.
One example: The Bakkies and his card episode.
I will now have to show you what you have “seen”
to explain, but let’s start at the beginning. When it first became known that
Bakkies might be in contention for a call-up, you immediately jumped on the
band wagon to try and find a reason why it was a crap idea.
First of all you
said you have been watching all the games and that he hardly played for his
club any more. I told you that you were bullshitting. Then you came up with the
next beauty..... “Ja, but he hardly ever starts for his club”. I then listed
and showed you that he was the regular started for Toulon.
Then, after at first saying that you have watched the games, you back-pedalled and said that he must have been subbed and that was why you haven’t seen him play. You have only watched the last parts of the games. You then immediately also grabbed onto that straw by saying that he is not even playing the full 80 minutes any more in any case. That immediately landed you a few dozen eggs on your face, because Bakkies has very seldom in his entire career played the entire 80 minutes. Duhhhh.
Now, on to the ever famous card. Your other “problem with Bakkies” is his ill-discipline and you said that he was recently carded for dirty play. I then listed all the recent games, i.e. the current NH season. He has not been carded once. Time to back-pedal again. It was definitely this year. I asked you for particulars and you have been dodging that bullet ever since. Now let me help you on that one. It was on 2 Feb this year in a game between archrivals Toulon and Toulouse. There was a ruck and Bakkies pushed down on a player. Census Johnston of Toulouse then came in from the side and started pushing Bakkies around and there was nothing serious at that stage. Normal handbags stuff. A big punch-up broke out and Bakkies was on the ground with a bunch of players all around him and Johnston having a go at Bakkies. Eventually his team mates pulled him away. Bakkies was still on the ground. When he eventually got up, both his eyebrows have been cut open. The ref was Roman Poite. He didn’t go to the TMO to have a look and sent off both Botha and Johnston. The was Bakkies’ first and only yellow card at Toulon. His previous cards were the ones for his stupid head-but on Jimmy Cowan and the one on Aplon, both of which was ages ago. Prior to that he had one in 2003. There are many players who are carded way more often than Bakkies. Bismarck du Plessis comes to mind.
There are other examples of your flops that I can go into if you want, but I will spare you that. Here is the clip for you
