FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  The Springboks Ratings Rugby365

The Springboks Ratings Rugby365

Started by bobbok...19 REPLIES731 VIEWS· 04 Oct 2015, 00:23
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
04 Oct 2015, 00:23
#1
04 Oct 2015, 00:23#1

PLAYER RATINGS: WALKING TALL





Warren Fortune rates the South African players!

15 Willie le Roux
Read the game well from the back and once again provided the Boks' with an attacking spark when he joined the backline. 
8/10

14 JP Pietersen
Was a thorn in the Scottish side with his eye for the gap and he also got on the scoreboard again with a try. Notched up plenty of metres with his runs and was solid on defence as well. A fantastic performance by the wing.
8/10

13 Jesse Kriel
A very quiet day at the office for the youngster. He did not get much of the ball on attack and when he did get his chances he was well marked out wide.
6/10

12 Damian De Allende
He is a monster with ball in hand and you could sense the fear in Duncan Weir and Matt Scott when he ran at them. He gave his team some good go forward ball and beat defenders with ease.
8/10

11 Bryan Habana
Kept the Scottish on their toes under the high ball and also made a good couple of runs. It was a good outing for the veteran wing who also got a try. 
8/10

10 Handré Pollard
Was brave in attack and gave his backline some great width with his passing. He also put in some big hits on defence. His goal kicking was superb, but his kicking out of hand still needs work.
7/10

9 Fourie du Preez (captain)
Another world-class performance by the veteran and he was one of the best players on the field. He gave his team direction on attack once again with his decision-making and kept the Scottish defence guessing with his quick service at the breakdown.
9/10

8 Duane Vermeulen
Made more metres with ball in hand than any other forward on the park and dominated the collisions as well. He is definitely getting back to his best. 
8/10

7 Schalk Burger
Tackled like a man possessed and crossed the gain line on a number of occasions. He linked well with the players around him with some great offloads on attack. It was another industrious performance by the flank. 
8/10

6 Francois Louw
He won a lot of ball on the ground and also carried the ball well. The flank also showed some nice touches with the ball in open play.
7/10

5 Lood de Jager
The big lock probably played is best game for the Springboks so far. He put his team on the front foot on a number of occasions and it often took about three Scottish players to bring him down. To put it simply, he was the best player on the field.   
9/10

4 Eben Etzebeth
Made a big impact on defence where he stopped a lot of Scottish players in their tracks. His big physical frame also kept the Scots busy on defence. 
8/10

3 Jannie du Plessis
Although he got yellow carded, it was a much improved performance by the prop. He held his own in the scrums and showed still has that grit which is need up front. He still need to do more work around the field.
6/10

2 Bismarck du Plessis
Showed some raw power going forward with ball in hand and made metres every time he got the ball. His line-out throwing was also superb.
8/10

1 Tendai Mtawarira
The prop gave Willem Nel a hard time in the scrums. He was also good in defence, but needs to show more aggression in the tackle. 
7/10

Replacements:

16 Adriaan Strauss (On for B du Plessis, 53 min)
Continued where Bismarck du Plessis left off in the line-outs with some good throwing.
6/10

17 Trevor Nyakane (On for T Mtawarira, 60 min)
Put in some big hits on defence and was solid in the scrums. However, he did not carry the ball once in the 20 minutes he was on the field.
5/10

18 Frans Malherbe (On for J du Plessis, 50 min)
Had another good showing in the scrums when he came on. He only carried the ball once, but it was a good carry. 
6/10

19 Pieter-Steph du Toit (On for L de Jager, 75 min)
Not enough time to be rated.

20 Willem Alberts (On for S Burger, 69 min)
Not enough time to be rated.

21 Ruan Pienaar (On for F du Preez, 77 min)
Not enough time to be rated.

22 Pat Lambie (On for J Pietersen, 70 min)
Not enough time to be rated.

23 Jan Serfontein (On for D de Allende, 75 min)
Not enough time to be rated.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 00:26
#2
04 Oct 2015, 00:26#2
 Who is Warren Fortune....these guys writing player ratings aren't even on the internet.
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
04 Oct 2015, 00:35
#3
04 Oct 2015, 00:35#3
really?
you cannot stand that a bok player had had an excellent game being a bok fan? seems like quite mean.
If you cannot see that de Jager had an excellent game and was the best player on the field you have a problem, man
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 00:39
#4
04 Oct 2015, 00:39#4
 Well I guess most of the commentators had the same problem , because they thought Pollard was the MOM.
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:01
#5
04 Oct 2015, 01:01#5
 Pollard? who says so? on the field de Jager was named MOM , this "player ratings" gives him the highest note, the other one posted in another thread from News24 also gives him the highest note,....
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:03
#6
04 Oct 2015, 01:03#6
 The commentators are the guys who talk during the rugby match....does that help?
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:05
#7
04 Oct 2015, 01:05#7
 Warren Fortune is an IOL sports correspondent .
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:06
#8
04 Oct 2015, 01:06#8
 don't be a smart ass and answer the question: who said that Pollard was MOM as you stated?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:10
#9
04 Oct 2015, 01:10#9
 Let's see how I can make this simple for you.....the match commentators, the guys who call the game, the fellows who are behind the voices you hear, if indeed you watch any rugby....those commentators. Capiche?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:12
#10
04 Oct 2015, 01:12#10
 Thanks Blob. I must say this is the first time I have read anything of his.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:12
#11
04 Oct 2015, 01:12#11
 Thanks Blob. I must say this is the first time I have read anything of his.
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:19
#12
04 Oct 2015, 01:19#12
 you still cannot answer a simple question and need to continue being a smartass repeating your stupidities:
name who said that, de Jager was named MOM and the commentators were agree
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:22
#13
04 Oct 2015, 01:22#13
Are you a simpleton? The match commentators after announcing De Jäger was the MOM said they would have chosen Pollard. I'm beginning to believe those Neanderthal rumors.  
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:39
#14
04 Oct 2015, 01:39#14
these were at most 2 commentators not "most of the commentators" as you said , that's why I asked to name them, smartass

and doesn't change the main point, you have a problem if you are not able to recognizew the great match De Jager jas had
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:50
#15
04 Oct 2015, 01:50#15
 Suit yourself. 
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
04 Oct 2015, 01:58
#16
04 Oct 2015, 01:58#16
 What did like about Lood ABFan? 
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
04 Oct 2015, 05:39
#17
04 Oct 2015, 05:39#17
A good way thr ough my review of the game. Damian was no great shakes on defence. Two first phase attacks early on were good. Backline spread defenders and he had a bit of space to work with. Nice interplay with Willie in the first, another at first receiver in Bok 22. Would run better lines if he cut into an overs/unders immediately instead of stopping and doing that awkward hop everytime he attacks. It gives defenders precious seconds to adjust and more movement for them to read. Just hit the change of direction instantly like Fourie used to do! Ran himself into a bit of trouble off a lineout at first receiver. 
Lood isn't very prominent right now. Mostly moving up and down the field, in the Middle of said field. When driving forward he looks very strong, but he has slow limbs, particularly hands. Fumbled a lineout steal and conceded 3 points off a penalty. Positives would be he is adding some force to the middle of the field. Scots trying to establish themselves there right now and threatening to buckle Bok defence with some monstrous charges. 
Will finish the rest later tomorrow.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Oct 2015, 06:43
#18
04 Oct 2015, 06:43#18
 The two dimwits on the site question De Jager's performance  - but what else is to be expected from the non-thinkers on this site?   We have the case where they have gone bonkers as per normal because of the Matfield issue.  Happy Idiots Day to both of them.    
AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
04 Oct 2015, 07:21
#19
04 Oct 2015, 07:21#19
 Greybeard must be man of the match without doubt.
Certain members on this site cannot see good in any players beside Greybeard.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Oct 2015, 07:47
#20
04 Oct 2015, 07:47#20
ABF
I don't know which commentators Mozart listened to - on DSTV Supersport the only MOM mentioned was De Jager - not a word about Pollard.
And De Jager was the MOM - nobody else.   
However that does not fit the Idiots ideas on this site.  Mozart and DF are price models in the Idiots Stakes.   
Lets look at the issue of Matfield again and put it in perspective:-
Japanese Test Disaster
Meyer gave instructions that against the Japanese game rolling mauls should be used extensively.  This instruction was ignored by Matfield because that is no his forte.  It is just too much hard work in the mauls for the physical deficient Matfield.  The result was a serious problem in that test.  Matfield was one of the serious problems in that test.   The only forward who showed anything really substantial in the test was De Jager
Samoa Test
In that test De Jager ws on the bench and as fortune would have it - he was replaced circa minute 53.  Our scrums were in trouble while Matfield and Jannie was on the field of play,   However, when De Jager came on he had a much more powerful game than Matfield and on the day put in a better display.
Scottish Test
In this tests we were fortunate and Matfield was not playing.  We had our best lock combination this year and it worked like magic.  Mozart went ballistic and referred to the lie he spread in the case of the Aussie test about De Jager calling line-outs to himself only - even though that lie was exposed previously.
So we are back to it - we have the Matfield groupies going nuts again.       
 
 
 
 
   

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news