Ruan Botha was far better than Matfield on the day and that is a FACT he not only played against Victor, he "owned" him.
"Tackled" - would be JJ's tackling stats which continue to be amongst the best of all centres playing this S15 - fact......unlike your hero de Jongh with another 50% effort this weekend - boy you really do call them.....about as bad as telling us Morne, Bakkies, Steenkamp and Victor are still the answers - what a bloody joke.
"Break" means just what JJ did on Sat......beating defenders as he did against Savea and Cruden in the test
"Young" means the players that should be playing ahead of useless washed up has beens like Victor or Bakkies......look no further than young Lood
" Case closed" is just that.......you hardly think your interpretation of the facts are ever worthy of consideration.......I mean hell, Morne and Jean were not to blame for the Barrett try, Marcel v/d Merwe was dominated by the Lions loosehead, Hollenbach dominated Jan, Jan only has an inside step..........its all a load of bullshit
67:32. MS takes the penalty and kicks for touch from well within the Biarritz half.
67:55. SF take a deep throw in the line-out and they win it at the back. The ball goes from the scrumhalf directly to Bosman who came cutting in from outside centre."
His second kick came less than 4 minutes from full time and that kick was clearly not intended to go out. The reason was that they wanted Biarritz to run at them. That was what they were doing the entire game. Biarritz kept on doing it and it failed every time.
"76:25. MS gets the ball inside his own in-goal area and kicks the ball downfield. Not out. This was the first time sonce (sic) he came on 16 minutes earlier that he did not kick the ball out from insside (sic) his won 22m. The ball is passed in-filed to Joe Pietersen who makes who carries the ball up before being taken down. A rcuk (sic) forms and Stade is penalised. They tap and go. Get up to 2m from the SF goal line before they loose the ball forward, the no 9 gets the ball but is driven out over the touchline. So, the ref calls them back for a scrum from where Biarritz lost the ball forward."
I have told you at the time that, had the Stade forwards not fouled up at the ruck, Stade would have won a turn-over or a penalty where Joe Pietersen was taken down.
Had you watched the game, you would have known all of this.
Scene 2.
You are still hell-bent that I was bullshitting, saying that I was wrong in my summary of the play.
"Just to check the game again to see whether you - the great thinker who believes the French Top 14 is above CC level - I watched the game again and you were wrong on virtually every count - but that is to be expected."
I then even made a video of that entire part of the game, posted it on YouTube, gave you the link and asked you to correct me, from that video. You never did that. You duck and dived and eventually pissed off with your tail between your legs..... again.
Act 2: The Bakkies saga
Scene 1.
Early in October 2013 you declared that you were watching Bakkies in the Top14 and that he was useless. Useless to such an extent that he wasn't even on making the starting XV for Toulon. You have allegedly watch the games and he never played anymore. I then gave you all the games that he played in and IIRC he started more than 80% of their games. Remember that you said that you watched him play. Remember also that you say that you make judgement on what you have seen.
Then on 29 October comes this revelation:
"Both you and Ceradyne are fools about
players like Bakkies. The
last time I saw Bakkies play for Toulon he was carded for dirty play.
I often saw only half of games of Toulon and never saw Bakkies. "
Now that yellow card, my friend, was early in 2013 in the 2012/13 season. That remark was an admission that you have not seen Bakkies play in about eight months!!!! But you only comment on games that you have seen.
That argument, BTW, led to how kak Toulon was and how they were on a downward slope because of how crap Bakkies and Johnny Wilkinson were. How did that turn out in the end? When I told you that you know fokol about the nature of the French Top14, you wouldn't believe me and said the following:
"Doos you are lying as per normal. I said Toulon is on the skids - they lost crucial games - actually four in total and they drew in one game and they have two of the highest paid has-beens in their team. I saw Toulon losing a number of games myself - and I saw myself that in one of the rare cases where Botha did make it to the second half - that he was carded. (But you said that the last time you saw him play was when he was carded early in 2013. That was his first yellow card atToulon. He got a second one early this year, IIRC.) You lie and then pretend to tell the truth - five losses does not count and neither does 1 draw. How many rounds have been played? Then give me the Toulon's winning percentage if you dare. The others played the stronger teams and lost - Toulon their losses came against weaker teams - bar the Toulouse one.
Indicentally after writing this I went to my bedroom and the Toulouse -Toulon was on replay. Wilkenson missed two penalty kicks at goal and also a dropped goal in the last second of the game - not so hot those misses."
Even after I gave you all the facts and stats that you asked for, you still maintained that Toulon was basically on the road to nowhere. Boy did that come back to bite you in the arse?
Once again, on the same thread, you confirmed that you do not watch all the games, yet you still maintain that Bakkies is crap, as I will show you in Act 2 Scene 2 . For this, though, we will stick to the following:
"Thanks for the info - a 50% win record - and I think that is bloody poor for the cup winners of last year - and they have more high-flyers than most of the other teams. The competition must be competitive to produce those kind of results. I tried to watch all the games possible - but not all games are broadcast especially of the Top 14 - but the Heineken Cup games are. Some shockers there as well - but the Irish teams seems to be riding high - the English teams not so and he French teams around 60-40."
Again. How did that work out in the end? What happened to the high-riding Irish teams?
Scene 2
Yet another attempt to prove that Bakkies was done at Toulon and that Ali Williams was now preferred to start, ahead of Bakkies. You reported that you watched the HC game against Exeter and that Bakkies was so poor that he was taken off and replaced by Ali Williams. That must have been your biggest blunder, bar the Morne Steyn/Paris Saint Germaine one.
The facts were that Bakkies was stamped on in a ruck, and had a number of severe cuts to the face and was then replaced by Suta. The reason he was not replaced by Ali Williams was that Williams was actually Bakkies' regular lock partner at no5.
Something that you surely would have known if you really watched the games. Fact is that you still did not know the extent of the injuries to his face, as you were pissing about him being left out at the following game. It was actually after he was left out for that game that you came up with the idea that he was left out because of his poor showing and early substitution against Exeter.
There are many more Acts and Scenes that I could show you, like the Amla saga, but I just could not be bothered. The above should be good enough.
You are a fucking liar per excellence ou Maaikie, but keep it up. At least, you are a laugh a minute. It is fun watching you make a doos of yourself every now and again.
