Tokkie eat factual crow 9.

 "Your empty brainbox cannot understand that the last time we lost four tests in a row was in 1965 or do you fail to understand" says the Perv.

 

But in 2006:

26-45 New Zealand

18-20 Australia

17-35 New Zealand

0-49 Australia

26-36 France  

In 2000 under your hero Mallett:

 

6-26 Australia

12-25 New Zealand

23-44 Australia

22-27 England 

In 1972/73

9-26 Britain

9-28 Britain

3-12 Britain

1972

9-18 England  

 

 

Damn it, you beat me to the punch! I posted all of them in the other thread. Other dates include 2000, 1972-1974, 1999 and 2010

S o how is your "empty brain box" doing Perv. 

 Thanks for reminding me - now who was the coach then?  Not Straueli - but with that record it could only be White.   
By the way - it is losses against 4 different countries that happened in 1965 - like Meyer managed in 2015.  The above made up 3 countries - or can you not count stupid?
Be at may the above does not include Wales and  Argentina - two far lower-ranked teams.  SB said our ranking is set to fall to no 5 - so what an extraordinary achievement.    

 I'll take the liberty of answering for him:
 

  LMAO  

 Michael calling someone stupid, immediately after making another gaff! Hilarious!!

So 3 out of 4 of our WC coaches since 95 have lost 4 on the trot and Destroyli had this run....3 losses, a narrow win, and three more losses including one against Scotland. So what is your point Perv?

3-53 England

6-21 Scotland

10-30 France

33-31 Australia

23-30 New Zealand

27-38 Australia

20-41 New Zealand

 Mozart
You are just about as clueless as it comes.  SB said the last time we lost successive matches against four different countries was in 1965 - so you started a threat trying to prove that was not so and  came up with BS.   The last list contains 6 tests with a win thrown in so as to make it look like you have shown anything.  
So what happens in Meyer's last 7 tests - 2 wins and 5 losses.   N ever before lost to Argentina - a first for Meyer.  Against Wales we played 30 tests - won 27, drew 1 and lost 2.  One of the losses was last year in November - one of the 4 recent losses in a row against different countries.  
You are putting up a determined fight to prove that Meyer is a half-decent coach, but is constantly making a fool of yourself in the process.    There is no doubt Straueli was a sh!t coach - but is Meyer any better?  There is no real indication he is.  By the way - White had the luck of a pox doctor in 2007 - a dream run.  The Springboks never played France, Australia or New Zealand in that tournament.  Matter of fact the only 6-Nations team we played in that tournament was England - which  in 2007 came third in the 6-nations after France and Ireland  and  whose team was over-aged and frankly useless.       

Oh the old White had good luck in 2007 pathetic argument. we played the defending champions on their home ground in the final.
NZ never played the Boks in 2011
Oz never played NZ in 99
England never played NZ in 2003.
It's called a knockout tournament chump. 

 France, Australia and New Zealand performanced much less than expected in the 2007 World Cup. We faced the best teams of that tournament. 

 So the best teams in 2007 were Samoa, England - the third team in 6 Nations that year - Samoa, Tonga, the USA, Fiji and Argentina.  Are you really serious?  It must be a  joke.  
I was in France for the 2007 WC and what you said about the Tonga game is true - the Springboks were atrocious in that game.   For the rest they were better - especially in the Round Robin games.
You are a joke you know and I am LMAO.   First of all I never was a Koch supporter and expressed doubts about our scrumming before the game.  You always talk crap about De Allende and that is a fact because you want useless Fransie at 12 - so lets continue to differ about him.  Other than Reinach in the Welsh game - the other players mentioned by you had very limited game time - mostly less than 40 minutes each  combined - so they had a huge impact in losing the matches?  That in itself is a joke.  LMAO  
    
   

 Mozart 
The dolt are you - nobody else.  For any team to miss one of the top ranked teams in the WC is near to an inevitability - to miss all of them bar England is a miracle.   So your crap is normal Mozart standard - way below par.  

 Actually, my stance on Damian is beyond irrefutable. Not a single Damian fan can provide a single grain of evidence for their claims. I have exposed this pretender with the utmost of ease. Then he himself expresses his troubles on defence, and is outed publicly as the Southern Hemisphere's worst defensive centre. 

 Just as per normal - your stance is refted in every match De Allende plays in.  The guy who promotes Steyn after De Allende showed how really worthless Steyn really is.  There has been no criticism of De Allende this year - the only thing said he should improve his defense - which in Super 15 was better than Steyn's.  He did improve in the gam against the All Blacks.  I did say he has to improve his defense all along - but I did not lie about it - neither did I ignore his attacking play like you did.  Sorry - but your stance of denigrating of De Allende in an effort to justify your support for the useless Francois Steyn does discredit you.  
I never hailed the Sharks win over the patchwork Sharks team as you said.  I said it is a pity that the Stormers send a poor team to play the Sharks and that was as far as my comments got - I was looking forward to see what the Stormers would do to the Sharks in the scrums - but it never happened.   I never praised the Sharks throughout the past Super 15 season.  What I did say was that the damage done by White in destroying the team spirit of the team and the lack of any team building would take a long time to correct.  So where you got the comments about the Sharks after that game only you would know.