Coach57,555 posts
23 Jun 2014, 13:42
#41
23 Jun 2014, 13:42#41
I keep general notes - in this case I will keep specific notes on Matfield and see exactly what he did .
Walk in the park.
Started by Mozart46 REPLIES533 VIEWS· 21 Jun 2014, 22:35
Captain30,741 posts
23 Jun 2014, 16:01
#42
23 Jun 2014, 16:01#42
BokBF who the fuck pulled your ignorant chain......if you happened to be a regular poster you would not have ignorantly said what you just have - now fuck off and come back when you have something valuable to add you stupid prick
Club Pro421 posts
23 Jun 2014, 16:45
#43
23 Jun 2014, 16:45#43
Well you did, I am weary of reading you throw your weight around like you are God’s gift to the rugby board. Your language and personal insults to those who dare to differing in opinion smacks of a small man with an over inflated ego. I am sure this post will meet with one of your ‘standard’ replies.
Captain49,914 posts
23 Jun 2014, 16:48
#44
23 Jun 2014, 16:48#44
Same old stuff. One could argue for Lood vs Bakkies or Flip. But that's all based on one tackle where he held up a player with the Beast's help. And who would we have played instead of Morne and JP....would they really have made a difference....possibly a negative difference.
It's all just moaning at the coach because we dont have all the players we would like. Pathetic stuff really.
Captain30,741 posts
23 Jun 2014, 16:50
#45
23 Jun 2014, 16:50#45
Anyone ahead of Morne and JJ ahead of JP for obvious reasons
Captain30,741 posts
23 Jun 2014, 16:53
#46
23 Jun 2014, 16:53#46
Bokfuckup.......its your pathetic call that I cant consider counter arguments that makes you look like the ignorant prick that you are - who the fuck are you anyway?
As for small man - yeah I am tiny!
Coach57,555 posts
23 Jun 2014, 17:09
#47
23 Jun 2014, 17:09#47
Mozart
It is the same old stuff playing that showed us up badly on Saturday. We did not look good in the second half of the first test against ales either.
As per normal you obviously missed 80% of the performances of De Jager in the second half - so you comment clearly is BS, also as per normal.
Stade Francais found out early that Morne Steyn is robotic and ineffective at flyhalf - so what makes him an international flyhalf? As Saffex says - there is a string of better flyhalfs than him in the country at present.
Jordaan was brought into the Sharks team at 13 in 2012 after indifferent pef ormances by Pietersen - and showed that he was better than Pietersen in that position. Why should he not be better than Pietersen in 2014?
You still have not answered my question - most of the players you cling to like glue - flopped in 2010 and 2011. What will make them top players in 2014?
It is the same old stuff playing that showed us up badly on Saturday. We did not look good in the second half of the first test against ales either.
As per normal you obviously missed 80% of the performances of De Jager in the second half - so you comment clearly is BS, also as per normal.
Stade Francais found out early that Morne Steyn is robotic and ineffective at flyhalf - so what makes him an international flyhalf? As Saffex says - there is a string of better flyhalfs than him in the country at present.
Jordaan was brought into the Sharks team at 13 in 2012 after indifferent pef ormances by Pietersen - and showed that he was better than Pietersen in that position. Why should he not be better than Pietersen in 2014?
You still have not answered my question - most of the players you cling to like glue - flopped in 2010 and 2011. What will make them top players in 2014?
— END OF THREAD —
