MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2015, 15:59#1
One would have thought Omelette Man, Pervert, Hasbeen-Ou, and Carbuncle would be mortified after the team they trashed destroyed Samoa. Nope here they are back again....mostly wrong but never uncertain.
Apparently you predict and bluster, get proven wrong, and then if anything bluster even more.
What a pathetic group of mongs....programmed by the media, twitter and their drinking buddies. Never seeing beyond the noses on their face.
29 Sept 2015, 16:16#2
A reasonable point Moz, but as a neutral in the dog fight I'd like to point out the following....Lood, De Allende, Kriel, Malherbe! All performed well! None of whom are on your list of favourites.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
29 Sept 2015, 16:21#3
Moz again I tell you I predicted a 20 point win, saw meyer had chosen a much better side etc.Those howling at the moon were Dr Mozz, Desset Fox, Cerundunce windpompie who thought M eyers selections for Japan were excellent. These oaks were warned repeatedly that what Meyer was calling his best side was a poor selection. But no they thought they knew better.BWAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Now what we are telling Meyer is Lood is far better than pap victor. The evidence has been overwhlming.
Those mad dogs barking at the moon are becoming EGG magnets as is clear for all to see.Beeno of course cannot be faulted in this matter. I got it rIght re Japan and got it right re Samoa AND OF COURSE AS ANYBODY CAN SEE I HAVE IT RIGHT RE LOOD REPLACING MATFIELD.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2015, 16:27#5
Ah yeah Moffie.....while you are about it kindly point out where I predicted a Samoan win, you lying twat
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2015, 16:53#6
I predicted a win for the Samoans but did not take into account the fact that Meyer put a fire under De Villiers, Matfield and a few other a r s e s - up your game or you are out. Du Preez did help in a major way in that this regard - but the one player whom everybody said made a vast contribution to the improved performance - De Allende - this dim old bird brain fart said he was tractoring. The stupid old dunce nearly had a seizure when De Allende was made the 12 of the round.
As per normal he claimed that -
* Jannie du Plessis had no problems in the scrums and he was OK; and * De Jager did not make a difference when he came on when Matfield left the field,
So what does he know about rugby? Very near to zero.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
29 Sept 2015, 17:00#7
Samoa are garbage? The why so happy with Damian? Is running against a garbage opponent praise worthy? You're caught in bind here Saffy .
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2015, 17:20#9
Gosh Pervie was wrong because he didn't know the Boks would be motivated when I told the old voyeur that the Boks were going to be loaded for bear. How stupid.
Well we have it all already in this string....the growls, the snarls, the whines, the yelps, the howls and the barks.
Barking dogs in a corner with their tails between their legs and their teeth exposed. A sad plight.
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
29 Sept 2015, 17:35#11
He who barks first is he who barks last dear old Mozzie... enjoy your omelette for breakfast and your crow pie cooked by Cloudy for supper...
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2015, 18:00#13
Sounds like you want to join the Barking Dogs club Sebastian. Fair enough. But we will have to consult with the committee. I'm sure Membership Chairman Pervert or legal ....hahaha.... advisor Omellette Man will be touch. Oops, shouldn't have used to the word touch in the case of Pervie.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2015, 18:05#15
This old fart was blaming the players he dislikes for the loss against Japan - not the players who really failed for the loss against Japan and he was pathetic in the case of that game . The Samoa game he called the contribution made by De Allende "tractoring".
The old fool does not realise it is his brain that is "tractoring" and that the diesel for the engine of the tractor is on the point of running out - hence the deterioration in the functioning of the tractorised bra in cells.
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
29 Sept 2015, 18:45#17
Mike he is a nice guy just like you but differs in opinion like most of us do.....I find him a decent and intelligent poster has different observer view but he is conservative.
Let all predict the outcome.
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
29 Sept 2015, 18:46#18
Mike he is a nice guy just like you but differs in opinion like most of us do.....I find him a decent and intelligent poster has different observer view but he is conservative.
Let all predict the outcome.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2015, 18:55#19
Seb
As long as he calls me a Pervert - he4 is low life and deserve criticism of the most severest kind - especially when he lies and misrepresents things.
GEgeneraltit
Pro3,164 posts
29 Sept 2015, 19:14#20
Mikie he is obviously NOT a lowlife or a pervert...and not a fool...he has a different outlook...thats good my mate
DEDenny
Captain12,893 posts
29 Sept 2015, 20:00#21
In answer to the question....cause they're hoping for another Bok loss. Nothing worse than a armchair coach it seems.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2015, 20:36#22
Imagine the scene in Omellette Land and Pervertville as the Boks blew away the Samoans.....no happy, happy , joy , joy there.
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
29 Sept 2015, 21:09#23
Denny, only CC are hoping for another loss, Dave and Mike think we will lose again...soon and they are convinced we will exit in the QF..if we make it. Moz and DF...and Cera seems to think that Meyer is on the right track. The negatives are either due to Meyer caving into public demand/pressure or SA not having enough talented players to start replacing older experienced Boks. The good match against Samoa is usrd as proof that the Boks are better than their loss to Japan would suggests...true in s way, but we should never have lost to Japan in the first place. Things are not as bad as some believe, but they are far from being OK. If you told me 4 years ago yhat Meyer's team would lose against the Japs in a WC, I would have thought you insane. Rationalizing the loss, is even more ridiculous.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
29 Sept 2015, 22:37#24
Japan played an absolutely outstanding game. Why can't you simply give credit where it was due? Its not as though the Bok game stalled, Japan were merely able to hit back!
When all is said and done Draad, what exactly would you change in this team's gameplan? Players either give coaches options or they become obstacles. Considering the obstacles in the team Meyer has the Boks functioning quite well.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2015, 22:47#25
Draad these dumb fucks don't know the difference between having an issue with the side like 95% of the public do and wishing a loss on our own side.
Old coffin dodger is too fucking stupid to see beyond his support of a loser....imagine the so called business he ran....what a joke
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
29 Sept 2015, 22:56#26
So says Stig of the Dump.
You backed a losing halfback combination that cost the Boks on the EOYT. I mean, a duo that were outplayed by everyone on tour and the worst half by Japan. And then you have the gall to tell me I'm stupid!
You chug on some crazy spliffs Saffy.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Sept 2015, 23:03#27
No you dumb fuck the half backs won us the England test but more to the point, useless Meyer has not come close to selecting my side at any point you fucking idiot so don't start speaking shit about who I back. My choice of 10 has been Pollard for some time....my choice of 9 being Hougaard or Faf....get it dumbass?
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
29 Sept 2015, 23:22#28
No, a seven man lineout maul with Schalk as the go to man pretty much won us that test, him along with Willie who drew two defenders to allow Reinach a belly flop try and an opportunistic Serf who pounced on a pass to score an intercept try. Lambie and Reinach were dominated. Loved that Lambie charge down in our 22. Has a nasty habit of it. Missing a kick into the corner when we were a man up, a Bok lineout ball in their 22 would have been game over for them. Being run over all day didn't help either. Man you are hilarious. Pe rsistent, but hilarious.
30 Sept 2015, 00:08#29
Geez DF, do you have to spoil such a lovely little fantasy with facts.............?
