FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Wynand Olivier vs Stepfontein....is there progress?

Wynand Olivier vs Stepfontein....is there progress?

Started by Mozart26 REPLIES929 VIEWS· 20 May 2015, 19:58
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
20 May 2015, 19:58
#1
20 May 2015, 19:58#1

These two centres are remarkably similar, but for some reason Step enjoys far more fan support and better press. But to me they are twins.....similar in size and strength. And in pace, Wynand regularly struggled in the pace stakes and Step was easily burned by Farrell in November. So who is the better player?

 

Defensively I'd say its a neutral....both tackle inside their channel reasonably well. Not always though as LeStat has demonstrated with Frans monstering Step, and of course Heaslip ran right over Olivier to set up a Lions try in our third test loss. About the same in channel.

 

But better than their defensive monitoring of the outside gap....which is very feeble as we saw with Iaone powering past Step last week....as did Speight with ease last year. And of course Giteau often gassed Wynand. Poor but equal would be the verdict here.

 

 

On the attack they both have the Step er step....but not much else. No offload, no deception, no speed off the mark.

 

 

Which brings us to the one point of distinction....the pass. Wynand did have a fine pass, something Step lacks at this stage. So on balance I see a lot of similarities  but a clear  win to Wynand in handling....he is the better player.

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
20 May 2015, 20:11
#2
20 May 2015, 20:11#2
 No offload, of course because nobody offloaded to JJ for his try this year nor did they offload to Hougaard for his try against the All Blacks last year.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
20 May 2015, 20:50
#3
20 May 2015, 20:50#3

By offloading I mean the stuff Frans does, SBW does and de Allende does....not simply making a pass.

DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
20 May 2015, 21:07
#4
20 May 2015, 21:07#4
Olivier ran better lines and was far stronger. But he was passive and not very competitive, also slower and not very good defending laterally. However, he somehow became a key part of their attack alongside Morné. They were deadly together. 

Serf is not good enough to be a 12 but not quite a real 13, he is lost between the two.
SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
20 May 2015, 21:56
#5
20 May 2015, 21:56#5
I rest my case, you've just put Frans Steyn and SBW into the same bracket.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
20 May 2015, 22:09
#6
20 May 2015, 22:09#6
Sorry I'm not following you Shezza....I think they are both excellent offloaders, is there a problem?  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
21 May 2015, 01:30
#7
21 May 2015, 01:30#7
 "By off-loading I mean the stuff that Frans does"  is really a joke in bad taste.  Most of Fransie's off-loads consist of just throwing the ball back in the hope that somebody picks it up - there is no accuracy in what he does.  
I agree with Shezza - putting Frans in the same bracket as Williams and De Allende is really funny.   Their off-loads are accurate and aimed at a specific player and done in such a way that it creates space for other players to benefit from.   None of that is evident in the case of Fransie's off-loads. 
Another imaginative daydream mentioned as if it is a fact.
By the way Mozart - how many threads do you start on Serfontein per week?  What is your obsession with this guy?  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
21 May 2015, 10:06
#8
21 May 2015, 10:06#8

Well fact is Olivier was a damn fine centre, better than Jean at times, but ultimately Jean was better and has in fact been our best 12 since readmission by some distance, so the fact that Olivier sat behind Jean in the pecking order is little reflection on how good Olivier was.


Olivier was certainly better than a player like de Wet Barry.


As for Serfontein, he has achieved more than Jean has at the same age, has a far better attacking skill set so ultimately will prove to be better than Jean ever was.


Last weekends two tries was just a little reminder of how good this guy is.


Oh and when did Frans monster Serf, kindly point this fabrication out - its a lie


Its just a pity we have such a useless Bok coach who sees fit to play him out of position at 13......what an idiot, about as big an idiot as the person questioning his credentials, the same clown who thought Adi Jacobs was a class act.......say no more 

DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
21 May 2015, 12:09
#9
21 May 2015, 12:09#9
Olivier never made the step up to test level. He wasn't as bad as some made him out to be, but was rather plain. Jean was always the better bet overall because he was the better defender for most of his career and a more opportunistic player. 

But Jean had problems, he liked to hold the ball and run it too much on his own into contact. His first instinct was to jump the line and pick an intercept, but once those dried up so did his attacking impetus. His running lines were not the best either. I recall how in the first England test of 2006 he broke away and had Odwa screaming for the ball literally with the width of the field open to him. It never occurred to Jean to pass and we lost by less than a converted try. The commentators remarking that those opportunities are what separates real centres from the wannabes. 

Barry was a more complete 12 who played in a poor era, our worst to date in over a century. But under Jake he showed us what he was fully capable of. His deft boot on display in the 2004 TNs turning defenders and keeping the Boks moving forward. His distribution was also a key contributor to what was a very high-end attacking game from the Boks. Sure the Rush defence was all the rage as we were the first test nation to utilize it, but we attacked hard! With a free running 13 and a hard running 12 who distributed we created lots of space for players like Jean to be in their element.

Frans: Frans is the most complete 12 South Africa has ever produced. Always bettering those he replaces. He resurrected our hopes in WC 2007 when Samoa had us on the ropes and in 2011 Peter finally had the brain to put him where he belonged. And for a time it looked that we were destined for a final berth. But then tragedy struck and we were stuck with Jean. Jean did make some breaks against Australia, but despite Morné playing as flat as he could there was simply nothing to play off of it, even Eddie Jones remarked on that. Frans is a defender that makes Barry look like a mosquito hitting a windscreen, is a breakdown presence, has the offloading skills in contact, is a leader, a competitor of the highest order. He has a wide range of passes at his disposal and makes those around him look better, play better. He is among the three best hard running 12s in the game; the others being Roberts and Nonu.

Serfontein: More of a mix between Olivier and Jean in many respects, but without the physicality of either one. When games get tight he has been blown away. But at 13 he showed good anticipation, good reading of the game and defended strongly. Has done nothing much for the Bulls. Far less than Olivier. I'm not sure which way his career will go and am not going to make any bold predictions, but at the Bulls he will undoubtedly be the incumbent for the foreseeable future. Not much on attack at 13 either, but when he played there, our defence was markedly better. It had been porous with JJ and De Allende.

Conclusion: The pecking order is Frans, Barry, Jean, Olivier for the past fifteen years. De Allende has alot to prove. He won't be able to deliver the full package like Frans, but he may turn out to be a very good 12, we'll have to simply wait and see. But one thing is for certain, he was destroyed at 13.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
21 May 2015, 12:15
#10
21 May 2015, 12:15#10
 Apparently Stepfontein is slightly ahead of Olivier in the pecking order
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
21 May 2015, 12:16
#11
21 May 2015, 12:16#11

Bullshit he was never given the opportunity to play at 12 regularly at test level and therefore to expect him to have settled and make a huge impression is pathetic.


He played most of his tests off the bench and many were on the wing or at 13......his consecutive test appearances at 12 were very limited.


He lived in the shadows of Jean and rightly so. Had Jean not been about Olivier would have thrived at test level as he was a damn fine 12. 


Barry was the more complete 12.....what a fucking laugh......he was useless with ball in hand and his only strength was defending......he was not close to test standard.


Lestat you keep confirming how little you know abaout the game.


Saying Barry was better than Jean and Olivier is insulting

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
21 May 2015, 12:19
#12
21 May 2015, 12:19#12
 Nevertheless, according to recent selection Stepfontein is favourite at present (for whatever reason
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
21 May 2015, 12:33
#13
21 May 2015, 12:33#13
 That is a fair point Saffex, but then neither was Frans before being thrown in the deep end at 12 in a World Cup when the Boks were struggling to hold off the Samoa charge... and deep in our 22 as well. Some players need time to settle, but truly great ones step up. Olivier had numerous chances and the only time he really showed some mettle was the 2009 Italian test that he single-handedly turned around. It is a very big step in saying he would have thrived, because there were no signs that he would have. I'm not particularly against Olivier, I liked alot of what he brought, and was lethal for a few years in unison with Morné - particularly in 2010 when they were shredding defences. But at test level? Not very much. He actually played better at 13 in 2006 than he did in most of his time at 12. Even stepping a few All Blacks, if you could imagine that!

Saffex, Barry ran better lines than Jean, tackled better - until 2005 - and had a much better passing game. It's all there on tape, get yourself the DVD of the 2004 season and see it for yourself. His boot pinned Australia back in their half repeatedly away and the rush gobbled them up. He freed up our outside backs and created space. He did things Jean has never been able to do. He had his ups and downs, but that 2004 set a standard Jean has never reached.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
21 May 2015, 12:35
#14
21 May 2015, 12:35#14
 Fair enough Lestat
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
21 May 2015, 13:19
#15
21 May 2015, 13:19#15

Bullshit, Barry did nothing of a sort, he was a boring crash ball centre who offered NOTHING with ball in hand......there was no flair or creativity in him.


He was not close to test standard.


As for Olivier, no he was never given an extended run at 12 and therefore to judge him at test level is unfair.


Frans might have set the world alight as a youngster, but lets face it for various reasons he has failed to fulfil the status of a great player........he has been solid but never special.......but then again that probably had a lot to do with him being played in so many different positions each week.


Frans should have only played 12 and made it his own. He is and was better equipped than Jean to be a true great at 12.


Jean was never a wing, he has been our best 12 since readmission.......Barry should never have played a single test, he was a very average rugby player who could tackle, much like Morne being a very average rugby player who could kick.


Jean, Serfontein, Frans Venter, Frans Steyn, de Allende, Odendaal, Vorster, Mnisi and Andre Esterhuizen are all better 12's than Barry was with ball in hand.  

DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
21 May 2015, 13:31
#16
21 May 2015, 13:31#16
 Jean started off as wing in 2004 and was top try scorer in the TNs. You are judging Barry for how the Boks played under Straeuli, not for what he was actually capable of or what he did under Jake. Whatever you reasons you prefer Jean, that is your business, but for me creating space, passing and running good lines and defence care the highest priority. And for that I place Barry higher than Jean. Jean is not a good runner outside of a direct hit into the defence.
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
21 May 2015, 13:35
#17
21 May 2015, 13:35#17
This says it all, good video as well: 
http://www.blogspotrugby.com/jean-de-villiers-and-jaque-fourie-overtake-de-wet-barry-and-marius-joubert/
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
21 May 2015, 14:10
#18
21 May 2015, 14:10#18
 Can't open it now but will try
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
21 May 2015, 17:39
#19
21 May 2015, 17:39#19
 Barry wasn't a great attacking centre, but a competent player taking the ball up. His awesome tackling was his long suit. If Barry ever played Step, he would have known where to look for him and tackled him into oblivion.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
21 May 2015, 17:56
#20
21 May 2015, 17:56#20

Barry was as useless as they come, even worse than a player like Barritt who is just as good a defender but has a little more to offer on attack.


Serf would have made a meal of useless Barry.....hell even useless Adi Jacobs was better than Barry  

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
21 May 2015, 20:08
#21
21 May 2015, 20:08#21
Don't know why you bother Dave. How many times must this half-wit make a complete fool of himself before you stop taking him seriously?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 May 2015, 03:54
#22
22 May 2015, 03:54#22
 Letsal and his rating of players is a serious joke which stems from lack of rugby knowledge.   
I was in France for the 2007 WC and there is some clarity needed on Francois Steyn's performances in that tournament.  This is more so needed in view of Letsal's comments:-
"That is a fair point Saffex, but then neither was Frans before being thrown in the deep end at 12 in a World Cup when the Boks were struggling to hold off the Samoa charge... and deep in our 22 as well. Some players need time to settle, but truly great ones step up." 
Was Steyn in fact a "truly great" in that Tournament.  I frankly cannot agree that he was truly great - other than in kicking some long distance penalties.   He was a stopgap center - brought into that position as a result of the injury to Jean de Villiers in the Samoa game.   The "struggling to hold off Samoa" in the Samoa game is a seriously funny joke.   By halftime in the game against Samoa the Springboks led by 37 points to 0.   The Springboks beat Samoa 44-22 in that game and what Letsal say happens when the Samonas attack is far removed from reality.  The Samoans did score tries and none of their attacks in any event would have caused them to win the game.   This is just a case of verbal diarrhea so often present in the case of Letsal.   The defense was a team effort and not attributable to any one player.
For the rest Steyn was just about an average replacement for De Villiers.  His defense was not good enough and in the Final he missed 4 tackles - the most obvious one was a tackle on Matthew Tait - which nearly let to a try for the English.   He was not in that game great on attack either - so what can be deduced from that?   He was in the Tournament an average player and not a "truly great" as alleged by Letsal.  
Dave is right when he said that Steyn in his early career showed massive potential.  After the 2007 WC he continued to make progress until his departure to France.  Something went wrong thereafter.   When he came back from France he was average at best on test and Super 15 level - with seriously deficient attacking ability and some real problem areas in respect of defence.   According to Mozart Steyn's stats - being consistently below par - does not reflect his value as a player.  However, I believe that stats over a period indicates tendencies on the past of player performances and if that is taken into account on the whole Steyn as a test center was rather average - with only a few instances of above average play being in evidence.   A "truly great" at center he never was.
Problem is that  the "truly great" status is accorded to Steyn as a result of a number of long distance  drop kicks and penalty conversions - not an objective evaluation basis for the rest of his game in other aspects of play.   
Lets look at his career stats as a Springbok:-
Games played   -    53Tries scored     -    10Conversions     -      5Penalties         -     28Drop Kicks       -      3Total points     -    132
Lets finally look at the following:-
 "Frans is a defender that makes Barry look like a mosquito hitting a windscreen, is a breakdown presence, has the offloading skills in contact, is a leader, a competitor of the highest order. He has a wide range of passes at his disposal and makes those around him look better, play better. He is among the three best hard running 12s in the game; the others being Roberts and Nonu. "

This is in most respects a serious daydream of general eloquence with very little to support it - matter of fact if it ever was really present - it vanished from Steyn's game completely over the past 3 years.  
                
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 May 2015, 06:25
#23
22 May 2015, 06:25#23
Lots of bother, but no clear argument that says Step offers more than Wynand. And he doesn't.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 May 2015, 07:04
#24
22 May 2015, 07:04#24
 Mozart
On what do you base your statement of  "Lots of bother, but no clear argument that says Step offers more than Wynand. And he doesn't" ?    
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
22 May 2015, 08:56
#25
22 May 2015, 08:56#25
 I am with Mozart. There is no CLEAR evidence that Step is better than Wynand apart from Bok selection preference.
DE
DezertFoxPro2,288 posts
22 May 2015, 11:44
#26
22 May 2015, 11:44#26
You can tell Michael has never played rugby.

You post numbers endlessly and you never come to any real conclusion. I have never seen anyone abuse data like you do. That is why you look stupid every time I bring the game footage to the party! Your entire understanding of the game is though numbers without any context and then you create your own narrative to appease your misguided trolling. The Hurricanes game last year was a spectacular example of you being exposed, then the Brumby game the year before. You trolled the forum bleating Frans cost us, waving your numbers around ad nauseam. Yet the video showed something very different. It showed a Steyn laying the platform for a resurgence from the Sharks, doing the hard yards. Likewise the Hurricances game where they cut off our outside backs - a game where you blamed Frans for not passing more and wasting "clear chances". A game where, at half time, Kankowski said they were forcing too many passes! How is it that you are so much more knowledgeable and reliable than us if you cannot follow these things in game? You told us all, with numbers, how ma ny balls Frans wasted. Yet he gave them solid platforms with strong carries in a game they nearly got out-muscled in amongst the backs. That tells me that you cannot read play or understand the meaning of the numbers you post.
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
22 May 2015, 13:33
#27
22 May 2015, 13:33#27
 Lestat has one valid point "Footage does bring tend to help prove a point" so please folks show try to show footage aye
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news