CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Jul 2015, 23:38#3
I do not necessarily believe the result thus far will be considered as more than 58% of the participants favoured the De Allende - Kriel combination. The next combination De Villiers and De Allende getting 17% and De Villiers and Kriel 10%
The great news for Mozart is De Villiers - Steyn who got the glorious combination of 1,3% and De Villiers and Fourie got 0,69%. Wonder whether he and Disaster have voted for the combination De Villiers-Steyn? Probably - because where will the combination get their votes from if not from those two?
MDMonkey D Luffy
Pro6,277 posts
MDMonkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
31 Jul 2015, 00:29#4
according to the commentators, kreil has played most his rugby at center.
the only reason he played fullback at the bulls was cos they already had an established center pairing in serfontein and jj.
meyer has already shown his true colours with his selections, and when JDV is fit and ready, either kreil or de allende will make way for him.
my money is de allende will be shuffled out so that JDV can go back to his fave position at 12, and kreil can continue to grow at 13 who is apparently a fave of meyer.
kreil also has a twin brother, a useless but interesting fact,

sharkbok
Captain23,458 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,458 posts
31 Jul 2015, 00:52#5
If the other Kriel brother played this weekend they would both be capped Springboks. Another interesting useless fact
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
31 Jul 2015, 00:58#6
Kriel may not have knocked players over like Allende, but he has been the more effective of the two in the tests. He runs into gaps rather than into players. Jean at 12 will provide offloads Kriel will exploit. Jean will also organize the defence, something Allende may never get. Put Allende on the wing....get him to attack the box kick. And use his power on cuts from the opposite wing.
In other words free him up to use his running assets, don't expect him to provide tactical leadership.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
31 Jul 2015, 02:18#7
Kriel can handle head on pressure, Damian cannot. Damian's only glimpses of attacking nous have all been in space attacking the outside. He plays like a wing/outside centre hybrid.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Aug 2015, 12:47#9
No contest......de Allende and Kriel make Jean look like an amateur
03 Aug 2015, 13:25#10
"Jean at 12 will provide offloads Kriel will exploit"
Fraid your a little confused ... Jean doesn't provide offloads to anyone ... never has ... never will ...
He's the reason we've had such a poor back line these last few years.
He specializes in the intercept and that too has fallen away some.
If you must have h in your team then play him on the right wing but for heaven sake leave the center play to those who know how it's supposed to be done.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2015, 14:11#11
CC
I have to laugh at Seuntjies aka Mozart and Disaster about their comments on the center situation and their reasons for support of Fat Fransie at center. They will always be toxic about De Allende - because he is obstructing the selection of Fransie to the squad. You must accept that the campaign here is the same - so we should know what to expect from the two comedians.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Aug 2015, 20:24#12
Yep Kriel's twin brother plays 12.....is bigger than Jessie....does not have his brothers pace or dancing feet, but is very good
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2015, 20:53#13
I think he played for the Bulls in their runaway win in Japan. It actually was a disgrace. To think that there are people who rate players like Du Preez, Fourie, JP Pietersen and Frans Steyn - while they are playing in the weak Japanese club system.
That is why they find it extremely hard to recover form when they come back to play test of Super Rugby games and rarely succeeds
Hansen would definitely not play Japanese Club players in the AB team .
JWJust_win
Captain18,570 posts
JWJust_winCaptain18,570 posts
03 Aug 2015, 23:17#14
Kaino played in Japan CleverMike.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
03 Aug 2015, 23:25#15
Michael never gets his facts right. He doesn't understand anything about Japanese rugby, or culture. For speed and attacking structures, it leaves South African rugby for dead. The price you pay for such a league is less emphasis on set pieces and kicking for territory is an after thought. To say there is no benefit whatsoever is utterly ignorant.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2015, 23:39#16
And they win virtually nothing outside of Japan if Japan "is a nice play to become a better athlete and better more rounded player.was".
Steyn and JP must have neglected the above training - since they came back from Japan even with less pace than the minimal pace they had.
04 Aug 2015, 00:00#17
Japan is the land of pretense.
They want to play rugby but have no idea how to go about it so they pay large sums of money to hasbeens in the hopes of improving their play.
One would think that they would've worked it out by now that learning rugby skills from the tired, the old, the battered, the past their sale by date isn't going to improve anything.
These guys are all useless and have nothing to contribute.
They play a soft brand of "rugby" ... and that's what attracts the hasbeens, the old, the tired and the battered ... because there in Japan they can pretend to be playing rugby ... while coining it big time ... see their contract through while chilling and relaxing ... giving their battered tired bodies the time to recover abit.
It's a poor standard of rugby and recovery is inevitable.
I'm confident that our schools produce a far higher and better standard of rugby than what is seen in Japan.
Why Meyer thinks that these old and tired players can still compete in the international arena is beyond me.
Look at Fat Fransie ... he had talent ... once upon a time ... and then he went to Japan ... now ... he's useless ... soft ... slow ... out of touch.
Just the sort Meyer's looking for it seems.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Aug 2015, 06:03#18
CC
Precisely - but some of the favourite players of Disaster are moonlighting in Japan - so now suddenly he must invent a non-existent standard of rugby to justify selection of the has-beens he supports all-out.
Richard Kahui - who was a AB top class player - was asked on NZ TV why he decided to play rugby in Japan. He was candid and straightforward about it - he said the rugby played is "soft rugby" and demands on players are vastly less than they are in NZ. At the time he was playing for the Chiefs - got injured badly due to chronic unfitness - and went back to Japan asap.
Who should we believe - Kahui or the Disaster windbag on this site?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Aug 2015, 07:05#19
Well at least they can keep the lights on.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
04 Aug 2015, 07:14#20
I love how Michael comes out and finds a quote that confirms what I said and then gives himself a high-five!
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Aug 2015, 08:06#21
You never said they play sift rugby - you claim the players are fitter than before they left SA and all kinds of garbage about the game in Japan. Now suddenly you claim that you said the same as VV and myself said. Are you on the sauce?
Then another classic - "Well at least they can keep the lights on." That makes them eminently suitable to play for the Springboks. That remark means that you are still insisting that PERFORMANCE means zilch in team selection.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
04 Aug 2015, 08:29#22
Did I not say it is less physical? Soft implies less force, which references a lower level of physicality! LMAO!!!!!!!!! Tell me this, does a faster league with more ball in play time not require greater fitness?
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Aug 2015, 08:37#23
A lower level of physicality is suddenly turned into soft rugby and the fact that a lower level of physicality leads to greater fitness is a definitely contradiction of fact. it is a farce to say the least. Every player coming back from Japan lost pace at an alarming rate and suffer from constant injuries linked directly to fitness levels - and they are fitter?????????????
What a joke - I really expect more from you than that garbage, but then what else can we expect from this disastrous clown?.
DEDezertFox
Pro2,288 posts
04 Aug 2015, 08:46#24
Once again your reading comprehension is letting you down. I said a faster paced game with more ball-in-p lay time tends towards greater fitness. Lower physicality was a separate issue that you merged into something else, because you are clearly confused and struggling to string a coherent thought together.
04 Aug 2015, 09:20#25
Exactly Mike ... it's just a matter of conjuring a whole lot of nonsense in an attempt to make his absurdity plausible.
Bottom line ... it's less physical, played at snails pace and just what the doctor ordered for battered body recovery.
In other words it's a nice little holiday ... away from where the real rugby's being played.
The players come away there unfit, far off the pace of what they were used to, well rested ... as we all do after a good holiday break.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Aug 2015, 13:57#26
CC
Fact is they come back to play in Super 15 - slow and clearly not up to standard. Being chronically unfit from the word, go they are more likely to be out with injuries - eg Steyn and Pietersen - but also Grant and a list of other players.
Some like Fourie and Du Preez comes back totally unfit and like Du Preez even injured in training because of unfitness. If Du Preez was not a close friend, Meyer would have given him the walking ticket - like he did with Fourie.
But the site duds cannot see what is wrong - because of the reputation of players. What a joke.