Come on then big mouth . . .

"How do you know I'm not clearing up all your confusion in the bits you didn't read? Huh Plumchum?"

Easy. 

You're not someone that ever asks for advice OR changes your mind. I've never seen it once.

You always choose unpleasantness instead. Which is entirely telling but a conversation for another day.

So, unless there was a miracle happening in that post, your opinion remained the same and it was quite efficient of me to ignore it.

"Just give me a quick summary as to what you understand from that statement?"

Well?

Patronising.

"Treat in a way that is apparently kind or helpful but that betrays a feeling of superiority."

Seems you don't know what patronising means but don't worry my good friend USSrooi, i am here to help you, as always.

See, that's patronising

Plumchum, I didn't read any of that . . . but you're wrong!

Yeah yeah...

Haha you accuse others of running because that is all you do...day after day. Does anyone even know how you look from the front? 

Avoid avoid avoid...coward

Actually Plumchum, I gave you a bit too much credit. It wasn't a one word answer you ducked on this thread, it was a one letter answer you were too cowardly to put up. Here it is:

"May 13, 2020, 14:52

I'll dumb it down for you, Plumchum, do you believe . . . 

a) Rooinek's version of events or . . .

b) Cowardunce's version of events?

Just an a) or a b) is required."

LMAO!

But you sit there and tell me I'm avoiding your stupid question because I won't put up a "summary"!

Avoid avoid avoid...coward

Wehe . . . Plumchum, are you sticking out your tongue, putting your thumbs in your ears and wagg ling your fingers every time you type that up?

Whic h is a summarised version of what it appears you spend your life doing.

Apologies for being more efficient than you.

Well, at least you now know what "patronising" means.

Silver linings.

Great. Now let's see if you can use the world patronising correctly in a sentence...since uncle Plum was ever so kind to teach you what these big wordies mean.

Here... we' ll start slow...

Uncle Plum is being so ________ towards me when he tells me not to worry my pretty head and that some things are too complicated for little chimps like me.

"Now let's see if you can use the world patronising correctly in a sentence"

Sure . . .

The fact that Plumchum had to look up the word "patronising" tells me he'd never heard the word before and now that he's looked it up, he's making an even bigger dick of himself using it incorrectly and drawing even more att ention to his laughable ignorance and lack of education.

There. Happy?

Somebody hit the sauce at lunchtime?

Oh right . . . the other guy is calling you stupid so he must be drunk. It couldn't be because you're . . . ummmm, well . . . stupid!

Could it?

LMAO!

We are so lucky to have someone so efficient in the use of the English language. Imagine how lost us ignorant uneducated souls, lacking education, would have been without the great Rooinek. 

Oh wait. What’s this?

“ Posted by: Rooinek (10318 posts)

Oh right . . . the other guys [note: plural] is calling you stupid so he [singular] must be drunk. It couldn't be because you're . . . ummmm, well . . . stupid!

Could it?  “

So, how did this happen? Was it the unforgivable sin called a typo? Or is it down to ignorance and a lack of education?

Honestly, it could. 

Anything could be possible. Probable? Well, that's another story.

A tale of ruined expense accounts and final warnings it is.

Saucer 

Thanks Cowardunce. I appreciate you voluntee ring to be my secretary. Good work. You should ask the Noble Committee to send you a Noble Prize.

Assumption is the mother of all fuckups. 

...and Rooi is it s father.

Twitter has been widely criticised. 

Seems like once again I will have educate you. 

Poor wee rooibozo still can't get Trump's play on word. Then the Dumbcluck quotes possibly the most corrupt politician ever. An abortionist up to term

Rooihatter is far, far gone. 

Here's the cartoon that Bozo pulled from the online reseller Redbubble . . . effectively removing the cartoonist Nick Anderson's right to free speech which I'm sure will annoy Plumchum (unless he's a stinking hypocrite of course) . . . but it's funny anyway . . .

Rooicommie,

I have no idea what this is about .

How about you do your best to tell me what happened. Without lying and without using words that you don't know the meaning of...cos we know what that leads to.

Sorry Plumchum, I don't give a rat's arse if you don't understand and I am not wasting any more of my time spoon-feeding a stupid, deceitful and evasive coward.

Sorry, I tried to find a nicer way of saying that but that's the best I could do.

“ If you do click "View" then you see the whole tweet which I'm not going to reproduce here, but safe to say the score is now standing at Twitter 3, Bozo 0.  “

That’s just @Jack trying to save face. 

He know’s that his “protection” is not in his hands. If they continue with their editing/censoring/shadow banning the will lose their protected status as a public forum and once they are classified as a news outlet, they will be fair game. There are already alternative platforms with proper freedom of speech. Just wait until they have their platforms’ functionality sorted and you’ll see Twatter take a nose dive. 

Parler is starting to gain ground. Clout Hub is another one that is a type of combination of Twatter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. Once they have their ducks in a row, the usual suspects will have their jobs cut out. 

"Flanked by Attorney General Bill Barr, President Trump signed an executive order in the Oval Office on Thursday that interprets Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) as not providing statutory liability protections for tech companies that engage in censorship and political conduct.

The president's order, which also cuts federal funding for social media platforms that censor users' political views, came just two days after Twitter took the unprecedented step of slapping a "misleading" warning label on two of Trump's tweets concerning the fraud risks of nationwide mail-in balloting. The move immediately backfired: Experts disputed that Trump's tweet was actually misleading, in part because mail-in balloting has been linked to ongoing fraud; Twitter's fact-check itself contained false statements; and Twitter failed to apply the standard of review to other users.

At Thursday's signing ceremony, Trump called the fact-check "egregious," and held up a photo of Twitter executive Yoel Roth, who heads up the site's fact-checking and rules-making operation. Fox News reported on Wednesday that Roth has mocked Trump supporters, called Trump's team "ACTUAL NAZIS," slammed "scary trannies" in New York City, and called GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell a "bag of farts." (In a statement, Twitter did not dispute Fox News' reporting, but called it "unfortunate.")

"My executive order calls for new regulations under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to make it so that social media companies that engage in censoring any political conduct will not be able to keep their liability shield," the president said."

Wow, another person disagreeing with RooiCommie is a coward.

Has there ever been a more single tricked pony on this site?

Rooinek: Carrots grow on trees. 

Response: No, carrots are root vegetables. 

Rooinek: You are a weak sniffling coward. 

No, I call people cowards when they are too gutless to answer simple straightforward questions that are pertinent and relevant to the discussion . . . and I either quote or put up a link to the actual question that they dodged . . . exactly like I did further up this thread when I repeated the question that you are still dodging like a pathetic coward . . .

"May 13, 2020, 14:52

I'll dumb it down for you, Plumchum, do you believe . . . 

a) Rooinek's version of events or . . .

b) Cowardunce's version of events?

Just an a) or a b) is required."

See, Plumchum? Note that nearly all those unanswered questions have been dumbed down to a single word answer or in your case, a single letter answer and don't require a "summary" or an essay like you demand.

As for Bozo trying to regulate Jack Dorsey and Twitter, I'm sure there are plenty countries that would gladly host Twitter headquarters and their servers. Bozo hasn't thought this through . . . as usual!