I saw an article that said Trump took ages to make any response to Covid-19, but then it took him 1 day to get this executive order approved against Twitter.
Trump wants the far right to be allowed to spread their conspiracies and religious whack job stuff as this will help Trump in the election.
Response: No, carrots are root vegetables.
Rooinek: You are a weak sniffling coward. "Cowardunce: Sniff . . . whine . . . squeal . . . it's not fair . . . Rooinek is so naughty . . . blubber . . . sob . . .
Rooinek: You are a weak sniveling coward."What ou Rooies, and perhaps also Jack Dorsey did not realise, is that Twitter walked straight into the opening that Trump has been waiting for, for a long time.
Something that Congress failed to do, which gave him the reason that he was waiting for, to sign this executive order. All of these social platforms have been on thin ice and they new it. All of them have been able to just avoid giving Trump reason enough to sign it. And then Jack wasn’t awake enough to see it and stepped right into it.
Trump and Barr must have been have a laugh when Jack made this slip. I suspect that they already had that EO typed out and ready for signature ages ago.
I haven’t watched the clip. Not going to. Not interested. Not in the least. You know the drill. Pacifier. Full diaper. Run along now.
This is going to be fun.
I didn’t watch your clip, so you are under no obligation to watch mine because frankly, it may cause you to have to run and have your, freshly changed, diaper changed yet again.
Ah yes . . . the usual Trumpanzee drill . . .
"How dare you say that! Show me where Bozo said inject disinfectant! Show me!!!"
"Okay . . . he said it exactly 35 second into this clip right here."
"Well I'm not interested. Not in the slightest. Not going to watch it."
LMAO!
Of course it was easy to spin it your way. Your assertion was that he said that people should inject themselves with Lysol. He never said that anywhere. You were not prepared to quote him and you referenced a point in the clip where he said nothing of the kind. Case closed. And this is the last I’m going to say about it. Nobody, not one person on this board supported you in that argument. On the contrary. They took the piss at you.
That’s the way the sleazy slime ball operates, Moz. He’s also thick enough to think that nobody is seeing through him.
Having said that, as I said, this is going to be fun.
Exclusive: Cruz calls for criminal investigation of Twitter
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), in a letter Friday to the Justice and Treasury departments, is calling for a criminal investigation of Twitter over allegations the company is violating U.S. sanctions against Iran.
The big picture: Twitter is already under fire from the Trump administration over its decision to put a fact-checking label on two of the president's tweets. Cruz's letter adds another dimension to the tech company's woes in Washington.
Details: Twitter allows Iranian leaders to maintain accounts on its service, and Cruz is asking Attorney General Bill Barr and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to probe whether that violates U.S. sanctions prohibiting American companies from providing goods or services to the country's top officials.
Background: Cruz led an earlier letterfrom Republican senators to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in February, calling on the company to ban Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. The senators suggested providing the accounts may violate U.S. sanctions.
The big picture: Twitter has said it's in the public interest to have political figures' speech on its platform, even if some find that speech objectionable.
LOL . . .
Just imagine how many tens of thousands of American lives would have been saved if Bozo had reacted to the Coronavirus pandemic with the same speed he reacted to being spanked on Twitter.
Just imagine if that was actually true.
"Just imagine if that was actually true. "
Just imagine if the arsehole behind the mask was actually a real person..
I know it's surreal , but imagine that....a real life person being the ultimate arsehole....far fetched?...not! We have the ultimate arsehole on site....stuff of legends...arsehole galore.... and he doesn't even know it.( hy gee voor hy'$ nie 'n poepol nie).thinks he's being loved by the NZders he suck up to.
Draad,
How do you still have booze this late into lockdown?
Haha, I have a feeling you'd fold old RooiCommie up and put him in your pocket right about now ;)
Nooit man, I'm a pacifist...
“ Posted by: Plum (5903 posts)
May 29, 2020, 23:19Draad,
How do you still have booze this late into lockdown? “
Hahaha. We had an Afrikaans ex pression for guys having Dutch courage. Hy is ryk, sterk, slim en aantreklik”.
"Nooit man, I'm a pacifist..."
Exactly the type that burn the whole building down when they lose their shit.
I never lose my shit...ever!
W ith a can of petrol in hand...
"I never lose my shit...ever!"
“ Posted by: Rooinek (10345 posts)
May 31, 2020, 12:28"I never lose my shit...ever!"
That must be quite uncomfortable . . . but it does explain a lot . . .“
Two weeks from now.......
1. Posted by Rooinek:
Draad weighs three tons. He has to. He, himself, said that he never takes a shit.
2. Posted by Draad.
When have I said that?
3. Posted by Rooinek
Are you denying that you said that you never lose your shit, yes or no?
4. Posted by Draad
That’s not what I meant.
5. Posted by Rooinek
Just answer my question. Did you say that, yes or no.
6. Posted by Draad
Look at the context.
7.Posted by Rooinek
Draad is a weak sniffling coward who is too afraid to answer my question.
Netso!
“ Posted by: Rooinek (10345 posts)
May 28, 2020, 15:39Back to the topic, just an update . . . the score remains Twitter 1, Bozo 0.
“
Has there ever been any meme more hypocritical than that one?
Score remains Twitter 3, Bozo 0.
For all his boasting and his bluster about not allowing Twitter to tag or hide his tweets, Bozo has been spectacularly unsuccessful so far in getting even one restriction removed.
Just wait for the first law suit when good old Jack discovers he has no special protection to fall back on.
Lawsuit?
LMAO!
Another Trumpanzee who doesn't understand that Twitter is a private company that has every right to decide what is or isn't allowed on their platform.
I really do hope that Bozo is as stupid as you Trumpanzees and spends money on a lawsuit that he cannot win.
Twitter 3, Bozo 0.
Rooinek
Just a problem - unlike the media who can be sued for libel - Twitter, Facebook and other platforms cannot be sued for libel. They have gone too far giving enemies of democracy. like the Ayatollah and the Chinese Communists a free reign on their platforms and use anything they can do to undermine conservative and factual postings on issues.
That i s where the line of freedom of speech ends - censoring of views that they do not agree with is not in any way allowing free speech, They make most of their money out of advertisement and those can be banned - they have already this week lost US Government advertizing and more is to follow.
“ Another Trumpanzee who doesn't understand that Twitter is a private company that has every right to decide what is or isn't allowed on their platform. “
Uhmmm. No. They are an open public platform who have special privileges that shield them from being held responsible for content on their platform. These privileges remain in force as long as they conform with the conditions upon which they were granted the privileges to begin with.
They were in danger of losing those the minute they started sanctioning posts on their platform. They were warned that they were playing with the lion’s balls and they were given rope. There were grounds to withdraw their privileges long ago but they wouldn’t listen. They were shadow banning people and deleting posts all over the place. And then they tagged Trump’s tweet and made the grave mistake by being wrong in their tag and Jack himself had to correct his own assertion.
They are about to be deemed a news platform with the same legal restrictions and liabilities as a news outlet.
Why do you think Mark Zuckerberg was so quick out of the blocks to condemn Twitter and Jack for their actions? Even he saw this EO coming. He knew that good old Jack was about to drag all of them down with him.
“ What does the executive order say?
Under a 1996 law, website operators, unlike traditional publishers, cannot generally be held responsible for content posted by users.
The sites are also protected from lawsuits if they block posts deemed obscene, violent "or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected".
The executive order argues that this immunity should no longer apply if a social network edits posts, such as by adding a warning or a label.
It also says "deceptive" blocking, including removing a post for reasons other than those described in a website's terms of service, should not be protected.
Republican Senator Marco Rubio is among those arguing that the platforms take on the role of a "publisher" when they add fact-check labels to posts.
"The law still protects social media companies like Twitter because they are considered forums not publishers," Mr Rubio said.
"But if they have now decided to exercise an editorial role like a publisher, then they should no longer be shielded from liability."
The executive order also calls for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to spell out what type of content blocking will be considered deceptive or inconsistent with a service provider's terms and conditions.“
LMAO!
The score is Twitter 3, Bozo 0. You Trumpanzees be sure to let me know when you think that changes.
Check the first half hour of this video. This is someone who has already successfully litigated against Twitter before.
If you want to keep on believing your utopian Twatter 3 - Trump 0 score, then be my guest.
As I said elsewhere, you have it wrong. In your tiny little brain, Trump’s main aim behind signing the EO was to force dopey JD to remove the tags on the tweets, and to restore the hidden one. By all accounts dopey Jack is under the same impression. I actually hope that he ignores the EO and carry on as usual. Could be fun.
Trump plays the long game...I wonder how relevant this whole thing will look in a year from now...he'll probably be fully vindicated...remember the "wiretap" BS?...turned out to be basically true...one can get technical about the terminology, but the gist of it was spot on. The media had a total meltdown.
Rooi just loves him a game of checkers.
Don't worry, RooiCommie, we'll keep making the world safer for your types.
And it's Twitter 5 Bozo 0 as they block another Bozo tweet . . .
Not sure there's much point keeping this score anymore. It should be obvious even to the brainwashed Trumpanzees that Bozo's ignorant boast about how he would not allow this to happen was just more hot air from a self-important yet ineffective fool.
Let's just agree that Twitter completely pwned Bozo (who for all his whining and complaining is still using the Twitter platform) and move on to the next embarrassing and humiliating Bozo debacle . . .
Looks like Twitter is not on the side of the mob of terrorists after all. They don’t want to let the terrorists know that they are playing with fire and should stop their shit.
Tell me Rooies. Whose side are you on? The mob of anarchists, rioters and looters or Trump?
And then on this particular tweet. Do you want the mob to be warned of the consequences of their actions, yes or no?
Two simple questions. Two simple answers.
"Two simple questions. Two simple answers. "
Listen, you pathetic craven litle coward, I don't know how many times I have to tell you the same thing before it finally sinks in to your small and cowardly little brain but I'll say it one more time . . . go back and summon up the courage to answer the very simple question I asked you on this thread that requires a simple one-word answer and then I'll wait . . . let's see . . . 40 days . . . and then I'll answer your stupid question.
Okay? Is that fair? Good, run along then, blubbering lit tle coward and stop your pitiful whining. You know what you need to do.
Oh here we go again. My question was first. This one, that have been ducking and diving around it for more than a month:
“ Could you be so kind and give us the exact timestamp and then quote exactly what he said to suggest, to you, that he meant for Lysol to be ingested or injected as a cure for coronavirus. “
It is on the thread that you linked and well before your question. You keep on saying that he meant that specifically Lysol be ingested or injected. Forget about your immature suggestion that he did use the word injection at the end of the clip because he never suggested that Lysol had to be injected. You can argue anyway you want. It just did not happen. This is just one more example that you are a barefaced liar. You can keep on saying that you never lie as many times you want. This insistence that Trump said that Lysol should be injected is proof enough.
Anyway. You are once again diverting attention away from this predicament that you are finding yourself in. You don’t think that your tactics are clear by now?