Grooming Gangs

Here.....apologies for the delay

Draad, I have a mile of respect for you, we won't and don't always see eye to eye but you're a decent person. you do make a difference on this board. Pity we couldn't touch base.

edit: it was shameful and we know it...that's why we ended it.

I've heard a different story, I'm not sure how true it is but I got this from a white SAFFA lawyer who ran his own very successful company.

He said that the boycotts had ruined the country's economy hence the reason the Nats handed it over.

"Do Draad and Rooi also fall under the plural you above, or was it only DA and myself that did all the apartheid'ing?"

Yes Plum, particularly myself,  as I am Afrikaans...we will forever live with the shame of Apartheid...but we did not create and end Apartheid only...we did a few other things too...not all bad...

Draad: Care to comment re my above Edit?

Denise wants so desperately to believe that whites are racist...but as it turns out, the first chance the white majority got, they ended apartheid.

But let's cast our minds back to Jan 6. Something Denise often uses to decry the racist Trump and his supporters. And let's ask how many people were harmed that day by the terrible racist scum? Here are some stats...feel free to correct any that are wrong.

Total People Injured: Over 140(I’m not sure about this number) police officers were assaulted, including more than 80 from the U.S. Capitol Police and over 60 from the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department.

Deaths:

• Police Officers: 1 officer, Brian Sicknick, died of natural causes after suffering strokes following the event.
• Civilians: 4 individuals died during the event:
• 1 rioter was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer.
• 1 rioter died from a drug overdose.
• 2 individuals died from natural causes.

Property Damage: The attack caused approximately $2.8 million in damages to the U.S. Capitol building and grounds.

But, remember when Denise was on here preaching BLM to all of us, and actually signing off posts with ”BLM”? Well, let’s take a look at some stats relating to his party.

Here are some stats for the BLM/Antifa riots...

Total People Injured: ~2,000+ police officers, thousands of civilians (exact number unknown).

Dead Police Officers: 2 reported.

Dead Civilians: At least 19 reported.

Property Damage: $1–2 billion in insured losses.

Has Denise treated these two with the same “objectivity” and holier-than-thou good faith?

Have we ever heard her talk about the disgusting acts carried out by BLM, threatening and harming elderly people, beating up people for no reason at all, killing people, robbing and looting, and causing billions of dollars in damages?

Of course not.

Why?

Because she will buy anything that any race trader is selling. And this goes back to the discussion that I had with Stav recently where I tried to explain to him why actual evidence is needed when you wish to demonise a group. See, Denise bought into the whole “50% of the US are complete racist scumbags” much like so many young US kids did. And the results, just look at the statistics above, at the damage to property and persons. Actual, harm caused by sustained and dangerous rhetoric for which there was little to no evidence. Rhetoric that Denise supports in full.

Why was it allowed to happen?

Because of the “othering” that Stav mentioned. And Denise has taken full part in that othering, calling others Nazis, fascists and racists. All the lies the mass media pumped out about how racist Trump was, how “far-right” anybody who didn’t support BLM was, and how fascists must be destroyed at every turn. Denise bought it all. Denise othered people, and continues to do so, to this day.

Why does Denise behave like this?

Denise is a racist looking for an excuse to demonise others while completely excusing the massive wrongdoing of those who look like her or agree with her.

And that’s why Denise called Karim-Allah “her girl”. Denise is completely absorbed by race. She doesn’t have anything substantial against Trump. She just knows that if she’s against Trump then she can scream racist and bigot at people at the top of her high-pitched voice. She has full license to demonise those who don’t agree with her, and that’s all she really wants to do. Not because she really believes those people are racists and bigots, but simply because she wants to cause some harm and she sees that as the safest way to do so.

An intellectual and emotional coward, not worth anyone’s breath.

An intellectual and emotional coward not worth anyone’s breath.

Wehe.....This from the Liar who's served the board a bible reading crock of shit.

"So you won't answer the question instead you withdraw yourself and make it all personal"

Correct, because it is a very personal issue to me, and I expect it would be for any other White person growing up back then.... and I refuse to reveal any personal information on this forum.... and why the hell is it so important for you to get my pesonal thoughts on issues like this when you despise me so much..... move on dude.

It's a pity but those are just blatant lies and once again political point scoring from you. I have only once used the term "You lot" not over many years"

And there I was.... expecting a little bit of honesty from you.......

"For a little while there I was foolish enough to believe that we were going somewhere with this debate, I now recognize I was hopelessly wrong."

I am not foolish enough to think or believe that anything at all that I might say, will satisfy your hatred of the White man.... I am not naive or stupid enough to believe that I could ever quenche that deep seated hated that resides in you, which pops it's head up every now and again.... it really is that simple.

You can profess as much as you want to, to everyone on this forum, that you now like or love the White man..... what absolute bullshit.... your inner hatred of us White people surfaces every now and then, so stop trying to pretend that you are this new and better version of yourself.... you are still a very noticable racist.

"Really??? Funny that for some strange reason"there were so many"  didn't reflect where it mattered most and that was in the ballot box. Another funny when one speaks to white people of that era, like you the first thing they'd say is I had many black friends. How was that possible when ethnic groups were divided into what was known as Group Areas and that it was illegal for black people to frequent white areas after dark. I mean you did say you had many black friends"

And this is where we always get back to.......and always from a racist Black man's perspective

How can you possibly say that you had lot's of black friends, because we were socially divided back then, almost every single day....

I grew up with boys in the bush that later became "Makhwethas" and we would very often go swimming in resevoirs, fishing in lakes or rivers... and get chased in the bush by Kiviki birds all the time, protecting their nests, whilst we would hunt for snakes...... you don't know anything about me and I will never feel the need, urge or ncecessity to explain myself to someone like you.

You left this country, and I could have done the exact same thing at any given time... many....many times... but I chose to stay ...... so don''t be so angry about the choice that you personally made.... because I'm not, and never will be.... I have a bloody fantastic life. 

Arrogant much? 

Arrogant for stating my own truth........ see what I mean, it's your usual insulting response..... racist much?

"I ask nothing of you or any white person I guess all I wanted was for a healthy debate"

No you don't, and you never have.... stop bulllshitting everyone, we are not naive or stupid.

All you want is ammunition to use later in some derogatory or insulting way

Your hatred of the White man is 100% crystal clear, and nothing you will ever say will change my mind on that..... so don't bother.... you are totally oblivious to your very obvious racist behaviour.

You pretend to start some innocent debate to get information from people, purely to try and extract that information and use it in some extremely insulting and disgusting way later on...... I have seen you do it far too many times on here dude.....just like some of your buddies do.

I have absolutely zero interest in explaining or defending why I am White, to you, or any other person on this forum.... I know what I myself have personally done over the years for the previously dissadvantaged, previoulsy disenfranchised, homeless blah blah blah blah... which is something I would never get into with someone like you, or anyone else, because it's just not me, you don't ever discuss shit like that.... you do it quietly, behind the scenes, without seeking affirmation or recognition from anyone, especially racist people like you.

And maybe you could answer Moz's question on what exactly you expected from the young people back then to do.....

But...let's just go back to you hating me because I am White, because then at least I know things are back to normal

"Draad, I have a mile of respect for you, we won't and don't always see eye to eye but you're a decent person. you do make a difference on this board. Pity we couldn't touch base.

Ja Denny...of all the places I could work while you were in Cape Town, it had to be in a place with no phone reception...it's been 7, 8 years already...damn, time flies...

And yes, our different backgrounds will have us at loggerheads...probably more often than not, but if we don't have these conversations,  we will learn nothing new...and I've learned a few things on this bo ard over the years...

"Yes Plum, particularly myself,  as I am Afrikaans...we will forever live with the shame of Apartheid...but we did not create and end Apartheid only...we did a few other things too...not all bad..."

Well, white South Africans won SA through conquest, which was the order of the day on the entire planet. That was the world. If you can't beat us, then we take your shit. The blacks themselves did it. Shaka is supposed to be some hero...well, he was around at the same time as the colonisers but you won' t hear him being talked about as a rapist and murderer. 

List of Atrocities Committed by Shaka Zulu

1. Forced Conquests: Expanded the Zulu kingdom through military campaigns, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of people.
2. Mfecane (The Crushing): Initiated widespread chaos and displacement across Southern Africa, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands through war, starvation, and migration.
3. Brutal Punishments: Used execution, torture, and brutal punishments to enforce loyalty among his subjects and soldiers.
4. Massacres: Orchestrated mass killings of rival clans and tribes, often slaughtering entire communities.
5. Cattle Seizures: Confiscated cattle from conquered peoples, leaving them impoverished and starving.
6. Reign of Terror after Mother's Death: Ordered widespread executions and a year-long prohibition on planting crops, resulting in famine, to mourn his mother, Nandi."

Now tell me, have you ever heard of any land or country that any black group ever gave back after winning it through conquest?

I haven't. 

Whites won the conquest game, by a mile. A game everyone was playing. And whites have given back far more conquered land than anybody else, while actually having the power to simply destroy the locals and keep the land if they wished. 

And just to finish on Denise. The racially holy Denise. 

She cares ever so much about apartheid after whites handed the country back to blacks...who have by the way been destroying it for 30 years, but we never hear about how the massive atrocities happening in Africa TODAY. 

"Global Slavery Index (2021): Estimates around 7 million people in modern slavery across Africa, including forced labor, human trafficking, and forced marriage. This is based on a broad definition of modern slavery."

Now, will Denise condemn blacks in the same way that she has condemned whites? As far as I can tell, whites don't own slaves today but Africa is replete with blacks that own black slaves.

In my view, whites made the same mistakes that ALL people did, but whites were the first to rectify their mistakes by giving back more land than anyone else, ending the Atlantic slave trade and not actually owning any slaves for a very long time now. 

Meanwhile, all the stuff Denise seems to be accusing whites of, is actually happening in AFRICA as we speak...but not a peep out of her. 

So she doesn't care about non-white suffering. She only cares about blaming whites.

A pathetic and damaged person.

Finish now......?......good. I thought we'd moved on after I'd said "I'm Done" but now that the cavalry has arrived you've got the wind up your snatch Huh? 

Coward.

You don't bother me, I know your type and I've stepped over your kind and created a life for myself.

So what I've previously said about you sticks.......and here's to u as well

"You don't bother me, I know your type and I've stepped over your kind and created a life for myself."

Yeah, best you don't actually engage, Denise...

You know there's another big old serving of embarrassment waiting for you.

"He said that the boycotts had ruined the country's economy hence the reason the Nats handed it over."

The boycots and mostly the oil embargo played a huge part, but the economy was in a better state back then than it is today...I don’t know what motivated De Klerk to do what he did, but I know the people in general were tired of the way things were...the vote in 92 was a massive mandate to end it.

"but the economy was in a better state back then than it is today"

The entire country was ......not just the economy 

SAA

Transnet

Eskom.

And just way too many others to mention

A British dad says that when his 13 year old daughter was raped by Pakistani migrants the police told him to let it go and threatened to arrest him for racism

Father's Plight

One of the first actions the Police took was to force a contraceptive pill into her mouth, yeah, these girls were protected 

Pill

And so the police intervention continues

Tonight a police station contacted a victim of child sexual abuse to tell her to stop talking about the rape gangs that plague our country

Samantha

The main reason Starmer doesn’t want a national inquiry into grooming gangs and exactly why any current report about this out there right now is complete and utter bullshit.

This is just one of many .... many... testimonials 

Bullshit Baffles

You keep believing in your own little ideal world Stav

I don't believe every whitey is a racist and even during the Apartheid era there were a few who were outspoken critics of the system.  Being white does not mean you're a racist and to believe that every white is a racist makes you a racist.

The conundrum of group association, another favourite for liberals.

On what ground did those white people  opposed a racist system? Certainly not on the base of being white. They opposed on other ground.

It is an absence of argument that makes a mere coincidence an essential point for decision.

People who happened to be elegible to consider as white people opposed the system. They did not oppose as white people.

Liberals are so used to bathing into contradictions they probably no longer perceived them.

Many other funny things like liberals claiming they do not believe in races and when asked, declare thesmelves white people. Or liberals claiming that christianity had a hand in ending slavery as people involving in ending slavery were christian.

n my view, whites made the same mistakes that ALL people did, but whites were the first to rectify their mistakes by giving back more land than anyone else, ending the Atlantic slave trade and not actually owning any slaves for a very long time now.

Rectifying mistakes? When? Painting themselves as having rectified mistakes for sure as they can not handle the burden of their actions. Other than that, they are fleeing responsibility and accountability for anything they deem bad. Crafting tales in the doing.

Rectifying mistakes? When? Painting themselves as having rectified mistakes for sure as they can not handle the burden of their actions. Other than that, they are fleeing responsibility and accountability for anything they deem bad. Crafting tales in the doing.

Well said Trad, couldn't have said it better myself.

"Painting themselves as having rectified mistakes for sure as they can not handle the burden of their actions"

"Other than that, they are fleeing responsibility and accountability for anything they deem bad"

What burden ...... I feel nothing close to it.

Also.... I am fleeing absolutely sweet fuck all ....nothing whatsoever... not a iota.

The only satisfaction that you would ever want and need is for my great - great - great - great grandchildren to walk around ....every single day..... feeling extremely guilty and remorseful for being White.

Just like me, they have absolutely nothing at all to be ashamed of.

DDS 

Gosh the Bore is droning me again Bwhahahaha

What burden ...... I feel nothing close to it.

Liberals... They behave in a blatant way and yet keep asking not to take into account that behaviour. If indeed white people felt no burden about their past and current actions, all the media would depict them as they behaved and not in a version that concealed the whole of it.

Liberals can not take a look in the mirror. They are in high demand for distoried images of themselves.

No, I just missed the entire part where Piers Morgan was charged, found guilty and convicted for hacking people's phones....

So much for you always demading that we deal with the actual facts .... just spouting more bullshit statements again.

Piers has on many occassions very publicly asked people who posted something on social media to retract their statement about him being found guilty of hacking phones, otherwise he would sue them.... and every single one of them did.......that is not the actions of a man who was proven to be guilty of a crime.

A Judge rule that Morgan knew about it. Why wasn't he given a conviction and sentenced?, well perhaps it might be to do with the fact that the lawsuit was directed at the Mirror Group Newspaper (who offered no evidence to contradict the multiple testimonies that elaborated on how widespread the issue was)  and not at Morgan directly and the fact that Mirror Group Newspaper settled and agreed to pay damages.

I don't care if Morgan has denied it, a Judge made a ruling on the matter. How can he sue someone who points out what a Judge ruled. Laughable stuff.

You are just absolutely stupid and naive

Go and look at how Piers Morgan has tackled Islamaphobia in the UK, both on TV, in the media and and on social platforms like X ...... he has been doing this for years, literally hundreds of times... non-stop.......and if you did actually look into it, which you won't, because it proves you to be horribly wrong.... it would also make you look like the totally ignorant moron that you are.

I don't like some of things that Piers agrees with, but to accuse him of deliberately inflaming the UK population to sow fear and suspicion on the Muslim people is just downright dishonest and lies...period.... it's actually disgusting tactics, but no surprises coming from you.

Literally hundreds of times, lol seriously. I suppose you watched everyone of them right? As I said Morgan's a shock jock and an outrage merchant eho does on occasion criticize right wing talking points and pundits, but anyone who's familiar with him knows where his political leanings are at.

And yes that tweet he made is a deliberate attempt to inflame the population.

And exactly what is your point here.....that time and money makes it accurate.

You guys were always harping on about the Mueller report and Trump being guilty and that it doesn't make Trump innocent ... and that cost $42 million and that was done over 22 months .....

That that much time and money would indicate its likely a pretty comprehensive report.

Where did I say Trump was guilty, I said I have suspicions about Trump regarding Russian interference  but acknowledged they were not able to prove it in the report. I have no issue with the fact that as a result Trump of the report faced no legal consequences  and was able to continue his political career, nor am I calling for a second report into the matter.

No, you are the one who constantly uses the running for the Hills analogy when trying to ridicule a particular issue or topic with someone .... you have done it a few times already.... it's extremely childish.

Well I ridicule extreme positions based on hysteria. Just look at your first response to my first post, straight away in with personal attacks and this indignant outrage.

If there is any clear evidence on this very thread about who does not give a shit about child abuse, sexual assault, and grooming, and makes light of it.....it's you.

I want the recommendation of the report to be implemented in full ASAP. Not waste time with another report. You are only interested in the topic because you want to use it justify your hatred of Muslims.

Yes, by all means, do that.... as a journalist I would fully expect him to debate both sides, no matter what the topic or issue is.

But since you made this suggestion / challenge, clearly to again try and portray Piers Morgan in a bad light regarding Muslims..... let's also compare how many times Piers Morgan has defended the negatives and positives to anything related to Muslims, Islamaphobia.

LOL as if your interested in a debate. Again look at your first response to me, you had already blown your gasket for me daring too bring up an official government report that contradicts your view point. Instead straight in with personal attacks and a dismissal of the report without having read it or any evidence.

So, here are just some articles or tweets from Piers Morgan on Muslims....

There are literally, without exaggeration, hundreds more of these references that I could post here where Piers Morgan has personally and specifically spoken positively about or defended Muslims and Islam.

These are the posts and statements from a guy that Stav openly accuses of deliberately creating and posting and spreading inflamatory news or information about Muslim people, purely to sow fear and suspicion of Muslim people..... 

You cannot make this shit up..... and the level of dishonesty doesn't get much worse than this, just to try and scores some points in a random online debate..... very sad indeed.

Piers congratulating first Muslim cricket captain

Piers congratulating first Musl im actor on winning an oscar

Piers referring to 1st Muslim All Black

Piers vs Trump on Muslims

Piers on Christchurch and Muslims

Piers showing how Muslims are treated worse

Piers attacking Musk for Muslim comments

Piers on Muslim discussing far right cop

Piers defending devout Muslim

Piers defending Muslims

Piers defending all Muslims after Southport attack

Piers stance on Muslims and Islam

Piers defending Islam

Sure ... of course there are some other articles where he has tackled issues involving Muslims and has spoken out against them....as he bloody well should..... being a journalist, because it works both ways, and of the very few that I have read, I fully agree with him as well.... but the absolute clear majority of all of his personal posts, statements or media articles are where he is seen to be speaking extremely positively and highly of Muslim people, whilst staunchly defending them against everyone, including the then President of the United States, Donald Trump.

You just don't get more dishonest than this unfortunately Stav  

"I don't care if Morgan has denied it, a Judge made a ruling on the matter. How can he sue someone who points out what a Judge ruled. Laughable stuff.

Just like you believe Trump is guilty without any physical evidence.... it's how you roll.

"Literally hundreds of times, lol seriously. I suppose you watched everyone of them right?"

Unlike you, I do my research and don't make assumptions all the time, every day........

"That that much time and money would indicate its likely a pretty comprehensive report"

LMAO... so was the cold fusion report from 1989

Even the MMR Vaccine and Autism Study in 1998

Or how about the Stanford prison experiment in 1971

Or maybe the Iraq report with the weapons of mass destruction in 2003, which resulted in trillions spent during the war...

Do you remember Y2K.... or the Millennium Bug from the 90's, where we all panicked that everything would freeze or stop working when we hit the year 2 000...... well over $100 billion was spent to avoid it happening, when they didn't need to...

All expensiv e and comprehensive research and reports..... all wrong.

"Well I ridicule extreme positions based on hysteria. Just look at your first response to my first post, straight away in with personal attacks and this indignant outrage"

I understand.... I do tend to do this at times, but only with dishonest or deceitful people..... I will try and restrain myself in future.

"I want the recommendation of the report to be implemented in full ASAP. Not waste time with another report. You are only interested in the topic because you want to use it justify your hatred of Muslims"

Nope, I just want every single policeman, judge, lawyer, social services personnel and perpetrators who managed to slip through all these massive cracks....to get locked up for a very long time, for hiding the truth and supressing information which resulted in all of them still walking the streets.... 

Very simple indeed.... you just don't see that or get that... to you this is all about race ... as I said a few times now.... one directional... blinkers.....no thought process.

Hmmm . . . I'm starting to think DumbAss wants to be groomed by Piers Morgan . . .

"Think about the insanity of your position, you harp on about muslim child sex abuses but you think a muslim man facing charges of child sex abuse charges has some good political positions"

I certainly do

Explain to me exactly what is wrong with mentioning that Andrew Tate has put together some interesting policies for the UK, which would benefit the entire UK population in a massive way.

I said this in the very same post where I also specifically said in that same post that I don't like Andrew Tate, and I also recently said that I despise the guy as well, I always have.....and I even specifically mentioned that I didn't even want Andrew himself implementing these policies, such is my dislike of him.

You see Stav..... that is the huge difference between you and me..... you just cannot differentiate your emotions or feelings towards someone, and actually take a step back and make a rational and reasonable decision.....

This statement of yours about me above is a clear cut example of that, and it is also why you lie.

So, in your inffinite wisdom from what you stated about me above....... Andrew Tate has some extremely interesting policies, that he would implement if he were the PM, and these policies would hugely benefit every single citizen of the UK in a massive way...... but I cannot like, support or even mention any of these policies in any way, because these policies belong to Andrew Tate, who I despise...

Got it

Yeah, that is how you operate..... stupid ..... just incredibly and unbelievably stupid.

So Quisling I’m still waiting, what were the people on this Board supposed to do as individuals…get born first I guess in many cases…to stop Apartheid.

Tell us man and tell us why you left leaving others to do it, whatever it is.

Raid the capitol and seize back the power that was taken away from them... OOOpppsssie, wrong country...

Interview with Andrew Norfolk the journalist who broke the Grooming Scandal back in 2011. 

Powerful stuff.

I prefer White Lives Don’t Matter day.

"Interview with Andrew Norfolk the journalist who broke the Grooming Scandal back in 2011"

Nice video, which supports my opinion that these young girls were not looked after at all, not supported at all, and completely left on their own to fight their own battles, even in court.

How the hell they ma de that one young girl take the stand for 12 days ..... As Andrew said....."The system was staggering unfit to look after these girls" ...."she was getting shredded by one defense barrister after another"

Andrew also refers to the several Pakastani men not getting arrested by the police for having two half naked 12 year old girls in their house, drunk..in the early hours of the morning..... who were reported by the Pakastani's neighbours for screaming.......how is that even a "lack of understanding" ....that is just negligience in performing your duties.

Glad to hear later that they eventually determined that it was a cover-up .... and the police were involved, but that's my question... how many more were invloved that were never identified as cover-ups.

I am not saying Starmer deliberately covered anything up, but I am categorically saying that a lot of information, evidence and testimony was deliberately overlooked, suppressed, or completely ignored, by far too many people in various different positions within these communities, whether it be from the police, social workers, lawyers, or community leaders....which I believe has led to so many perpetrators or other guilty parties that were complicit in this ..... still walking the streets.

I also see nothing wrong with implementing all the necessary recommendations from earlier reports, but only whilst another fully independent and transparent investigation is carried out.

If there is one way to make this issue go away, you need to appease the people .....give the UK citizens what they want, because the longer you deny their requests for a fully comprehensively detailed report on this very specific issue.... the more you are sending the wrong message to your citizens that you could be perceived to be actively trying to hide something from them or covering something up.

Here is an article that came out this morning, from Sue Reid regarding the grooming gangs.

For space reasons, I wish I could just have just posted the link, but it is behind a paywall, so I will have to post the article itself unfortunately.

Sue was the first writer to expose these grooming gangs back in 1997, and even includes the multiple headlines that she wrote back then in this article, which I won't post those here because I think the images will destroy the margins... Sue is agreeing with the British public that a completely new investigation into what happened needs to be done, and when you read this column of hers, one can understand why.

SUE REID: I was the first writer to expose the grooming gangs - and had 'Racist Scum' daubed outside my house. Only a national inquiry will expose the extent of the cover-up I witnessed

By SUE REID

Published: 01:54 GMT, 10 January 2025 | Updated: 03:19 GMT, 10 January 2025

I vividly remember the moment I was first told of a grooming gang's rape of a young white girl in a northern town.

A crude message flicked up on my Nokia mobile phone with a number to call. 'I have a something bad to tell U,' it said. 'My daughter has been stolen and f***ed.'

I rang back the caller who had sent me what was a desperate cry for help.

It was 1997, and she was a mother from Lancashire whose innocent 12-year-old girl had been lured into the clutches of the gang, believing – naively – they were glamorous would-be boyfriends.

After turning up in a big flashy car, they had chatted her up at the school gates one afternoon during her first term at secondary with the words: 'Fancy a lift home, love? We can go for pizza.'

In the months that followed, the men took turns to savagely rape her in locations ranging from car parks and sheds to the back rooms of kebab shops, until, as the mother told me: 'There wasn't much left of her.'

A loyal Labour voter, she first turned for help to her Lancashire town's councillors. When she got no joy there, she tried her local MP, then the police and finally social workers. But no one would listen.

Even the children's charity on the nearby High Street ignored this woman's pleas for help to rescue her daughter from the gang of predominantly Muslim men of Pakistani heritage. In desperation, she sought help from the local branch of the fascist British National Party.

It was a terrible story. But to my lasting regret, the mother's links to the BNP silenced me. I did not drive the three hours from my home to meet her face-to-face to check whether what she was saying was true.

I now know that other national newspaper journalists back in the early years of Tony Blair's premiership – when I got the mother's phone message – were hearing similar horror stories about the gang-rapes of girls in the North and Midlands.

Parents were given journalists' numbers by the media-savvy BNP – to whom more and more desperate and ignored families turned. But I, like my colleagues, was terrified that writing up the mothers' stories would give the oxygen of publicity to a neo-Nazi political party with an inflammatory racist agenda.

It was only 13 years later – in 2010 – that I became the first British newspaper journalist to write about the child-abuse scandal, which we now know had been covered up for decades by a liberal-Left officialdom worshipping at the altar of a false god: multiculturalism.

That year, in August, my first story ran in the Mail under the headline: 'Predatory gangs, middle-class girls forced into the sex trade and a very troubling taboo.' A second, in November, declared: 'Asian gangs, schoolgirls, and a sinister taboo: the disturbing crime few dare talk about.'

The backlash to these carefully written articles was ferocious. I was smeared in anonymised emails and letters as a liar and a racist. Meanwhile, savage monsters, apparently with impunity, continued to take away the innocence of hundreds of thousands of girls, predominantly white and some as young as eight.

At last, this shameful episode in British history is receiving the national, and international, attention it deserves. And that is thanks, in large part, to the world's richest man, Tesla founder Elon Musk – and his unlikely support for Tommy Robinson aka Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who like that Lancashire mother of a raped child all those years ago is connected with the rabble-rousing BNP.

Robinson, 42, is a Luton-born former supporter of the party. A founder of the far-Right English Defence League, he is an ill-educated, violent ex-druggie, currently serving a prison sentence for contempt of court.

Musk believes he is a political prisoner who should be released.

Deeply reprehensible though Robinson appears, the documentaries he has made over many years and his social media posts revealing the vile gangs' activities have been viewed by millions worldwide.

One of them was Musk, who brought the matter to international attention last week by posting horrendous details from a court transcript (too graphic for a family newspaper to publish) of one particular white schoolgirl's ordeal – and by attacking Keir Starmer for his woeful failure to act over the scandal which goes back decades.

The first to raise the matter of the 'sex grooming' taking place on British streets on an industrial scale, however, were British Sikhs.

Tensions between the Sikh community and British Muslims escalated in the 1970s and, in 1988, a Birmingham local TV station produced a report on 'child rape for profit'.

In it, Sikh leaders alleged that 'Muslim youth are coming around our schools abducting and raping girls'. One added: 'We don't want this. We know what happens to the girls after – they are sold into prostitution.'

The Sikhs, with a reputation for being fierce warriors, scared the gangs off. But the plight of their daughters was a terrible, unheeded, warning.

This week, the Sikh community reposted the 1988 TV report on social media, with the comment: 'The UK authorities later wilfully buried the truth about this cancer, with [Muslim] newcomers making white Caucasian girls their target instead. They have let it metastasize countrywide over three decades.'

Blair's New Labour government, which took power in 1997, had launched an open-door immigration policy. In this new world the authorities were determined to uphold the image of a successful multicultural society at all costs – even if it meant denying justice and protection to the child victims of rape.

Sir Keir Starmer only fanned the flames this week when he claimed those demanding a statutory inquiry (where evidence is given under oath) were 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far Right'.

In one fell swoop, he denounced a wide array of people who have grown ever more disturbed about the mass child rape gang epidemic. Not least among them, family members of what is thought to be upwards of 250,000 girls attacked repeatedly by street gangs in 50 British towns and cities over the past 40 years. 

I first met one such victim of a street gang in August 2010. Emma Jackson (not her real name), then in her early 20s, agreed to speak on condition of strict anonymity after I had tracked her down having heard of her case. Years after escaping the gang, she was still frightened of being attacked by them.

In my Daily Mail report, I changed the name of the area in West Yorkshire where she lived because the family were terrified of retaliation from the gang who had plagued them with threatening phone calls and messages, day and night, in a bid to keep them quiet.

'U R 4 it,' a text would tell the family out of the blue. 'Open your mouth and you will get a bullet in it.'

If Emma's mother Jane answered her mobile, a man would say: 'Put her on the phone, love. Just do it or else.'

In other cases, the gangs have forced girls to stay silent by threatening to tell their families they are prostitutes, or rape their little sisters or kill their parents with knives or firebombs.

Emma's family moved abroad to escape the gang and returned years later, only to find the same men waiting for them in the same town. Men who began sending the same repulsive and threatening messages.

When she was first raped – multiple times – Emma was 13, still playing with dolls and had never kissed a boy. The highlight of her week was Saturday when she would meet friends in the play park at the local Tesco shopping centre while her middle-class parents, Jack and Carol, stocked up on groceries.

Yet by her 14th birthday her innocence was over. She had been sexually abused by 54 men from all over Britain.

'One minute I was playing with dolls, the next I was a sex slave,' she told me in a heartbreaking interview. 'I was wearing my favourite candy-striped ankle socks when I was first raped on wasteland. Afterwards, my white coat was covered in blood and they left me to go home on the bus alone.'

Emma had been lured into the gang by a teenage Pakistani boy her own age. He met her in the play park and introduced her to older relatives, in their 20s and 30s, who told her they wanted to be her friend, too. They then plied her with vodka, cigarettes and cannabis joints.

'I thought I was having a great time. I had no idea the men were part of a gang,' she told me. 'They were more exciting than my school friends. I began to meet the men every day after school before catching the bus home.'

Sadly, Emma's story is typical. I have been told almost exactly the same horror stories by girls in a myriad different towns. One called Jessica was the daughter of a property developer, and was living in Rochdale when she became embroiled with a gang.

Suddenly, at 15, she wanted to be out late all the time, her father told me in 2012. 'If we kept her in she'd climb out of the upstairs window onto a flat roof above the porch, jump down and disappear into the streets.

'I would drive my BMW around trying to find her. It happened more times than I can remember. It was much worse than normal teenage rebellion.'

Their daughter – studying for her GCSEs – had been lured into an underage sex-for-sale ring operating from kebab shops and takeaways in Rochdale, and run by men of Pakistani heritage. At one stage, horrifyingly, she was forced to sleep with five men a day, four or five times a week.

One day, the gang's 59-year-old leader invited her to a kebab shop for a chat. He hurled her onto a mattress on the floor and raped her. During the ordeal in an upstairs room she just stared at a children's clock with the face of an angel on it hanging on the wall. Afterwards, the man told her not to cry.

At a trial which ended just before I met the family, that ringleader and eight other men were jailed for rape, aiding and abetting rape, the trafficking of girls and conspiracy to have sex with a child. One was an Afghan national and the rest were of British Muslim Pakistani heritage.

Part of the cover-up – for that is what it has been – is the apparent reluctance by officialdom to chase down perpetrators. Child protection officers in the town where I spoke to Emma were accused by the police watchdog's chief inspector of deliberately 'undermining' the girls by 'disproving their word'. 

A rape survivor from the same area was this week told by police to delete her social media posts which blame local officers for turning a blind eye.

At one stage only three part-time officers were responsible for finding child rapists who had abused 'hundreds' of children.

Labour politicians this week voted against a new national public inquiry into this most appalling scandal because we had an independent investigation into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) published two years ago.

Charlie Peters, a reporter on GB News – which has been at the forefront of the latest exposures – begged to differ. He produced data showing that the IICSA probe was selective, not nationally focused, and used six case-study areas where there were no significant reports of Pakistani-Muslim gangs roaming the streets to find girls.

None of the northern towns –such as Rotherham or Rochdale where the abuse first emerged –were chosen for scrutiny.

While online sex grooming and allegations of paedophilia by Roman Catholic clerics were given their own sections in the report, Bristol was the only place with grooming gangs examined in depth (and this involved convicted Somalians).

To my mind the case for an inquiry into grooming is undeniable. In Derby, three teenagers bravely gave evidence at a trial which resulted in nine men being jailed for a string of offences involving 27 girls.

The gang – all but one a Pakistani Muslim – had taken them to rundown flats with mattresses on the floor. They were locked into rooms and turned into sex slaves for strings of men who paid gang leaders a fee to rape them.

Incredibly, the gang members told the Derby court that the girls had agreed to multiple rapes. 'These are girls I did not respect who are just partying and taking drugs and we had consensual sex,' said the leader Abid Saddique.

The men hid their double lives from their wife or wives, who were often unable to speak English having been brought from Pakistan for arranged marriages.

I wrote at the time: 'There is an uncomfortable element to this. In politically correct modern Britain, it is taboo for anyone involved in bringing these cases to court – including the police, social workers and councillors – to talk about the ethnicity of the perpetrators.

I found that children's charities helping the victims recover hid the racial make-up of the gangs. One called Risky Business, which operated in Rotherham, refused to answer any of my questions relating to the background of the perpetrators.

At another charity, Coalition For The Removal Of Pimping, based in Leeds, the chief executive officer at the time said in a recorded conversation with me: 'It is a crime committed by men. We are trying to work in their communities to change their attitudes to women. I cannot speak about the race of the criminals involved.'

The backlash was vicious against anyone who dared reveal the facts: that the sex attacks on girls in these northern towns and cities were, and are, mainly by men of Pakistani heritage.

My house in London was attacked three times, with the slogan 'Sue Reid, Racist Scum' painted on the pavement outside, and posters were put up on lampposts over six nearby roads.

In multi-cultural Britain I was saying the unsayable. Thankfully, though, others were, too.

A true heroine in the campaign to expose these revolting child rapes is the politician Ann Cryer, who spoke up first in 2002.

As Labour MP for Keighley, near Bradford, she was in a good position to comment on the situation. 'It is a fact that all the victims of these terrible crimes are white girls, and all the alleged perpetrators are [south] Asian men,' she said.

'The family and cultural norms of this community mean the men are expected to marry a first cousin or another relative.

'Therefore, until the marriage is arranged, they look for sex. Their view of white women is generally pretty low.'

For breaking the taboo, the conspiracy of silence about the men's race, she was immediately shunned by the police, social workers and imams in her West Yorkshire constituency.

Revealingly, even Emma Jackson – the first victim I interviewed – and her mother waited until the end of our four-hour meeting before they even mentioned the ethnicity of her tormentors.

The two called me back into the hallway as I was leaving. Then, apologising in almost a whisper, Emma said: 'We don't want to sound racist. But we must tell you something important that you never asked us about.

'Nearly all the men running the rape gangs are of Pakistani origin. But very few of the authorities, from councillors, social workers, to the police, will say so publicly.

'They are scared of telling the truth. The gangs could attack them or they might lose their jobs.'

So an evil conspiracy of silence continued to condemn countless young girls to their fate.

Assimilation is a bad thing. These dudes behave the way liberals have behaved in many places around the world and instead of welcoming liberal brothers and sisters, white people scream racism. Go figure.

Darn white folk, they fck up everything, nè Trad?...how convenient for you? No accountability, just passing the buck...pathetic.

Trad is a non Saffa whitey. Us mean Saffas hurt him a little too much.

LOL 

Trad is a commie...his race is of no relevance...his ideas make him an idiot, not his race...plenty smart people of all races...unfortunately plenty of idiots of all races too.

It also doesn't help when you have immigration lawyers in the UK processing fake asylum claims and briefing clients on exactly how to lie, to beat the system and win their right to stay in Britain.