…..they seem to be mostly women and girls. Very few boys and even less old men. More than any other image of the war, this defines just how evil these men are. The school that was hit next to the Islamic Guard facility, a girls’ school. This is a disgusting group of old men preying on the dispensable, mostly women and girls.
Those who are arguing against it’s removal and the need to prevent them from obtaining a bomb are on the wrong side of Western values.
The girls’ school in Minab was reported to be on the same block / in the same compound area as Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities, and one report said the Shahid Absalan clinic was about 780 feet aw
Almost 1 km away, is not that close for modern day weapons with GPS targeting.
The gender pattern in the broader context also cuts against that framing. In Iran, compulsory military service applies to men, while women generally do not have mandatory service and usually serve in support roles rather than front-line combat, so a crowd around infrastructure would not automatically imply a female-majority military group
The enquiry has followed the same path as the Epstein files.
First of all there are 3280 ft in KM. Secondly this is what AI says:
The Shajaba Tayyiba Girls' school in Minab, Iran, was located approximately 200 feet (about 60–100 yards) from an
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval base, with some reports identifying it as adjacent to the base’s northwest corner. Although separated by a wall, the school was situated within the immediate vicinity of the military complex.
The evidence suggests this was another human shield
--
So Trump TACO's again. The Trumpanzee species will say threatening to destroy a whole country was 3D chess.
One day America will not have the strongest military, when the divided states of America have a civil war or states cede. -
Who exactly is threatening to wipe their nation from the face of the earth? Somehow, using women as shields is bad when Trump is threatening to wipe out millions of them. If Trump was going to obliterate them all anyway, does it really matter where they stand?
I dont think anyone in recent memory has threatened to wipe out the whole nation.
It is more effective in the media to use women, and they are also not in the army anyway.
Somehow America are once again the good guys. The problem is only Americans, and a few random Trump supporters from around the world seem to believe this.
MAGA is Hamas. It is not a Western Democratic movement.
Vance in Hungary speaks volumes.
You lot siding with Iran speaks volumes...you do realize, all the fatalities during this war, on both sides and accross the region are still less than a quarter of the people killed by the regime in less than 2 weeks in the beginning of the year...people who uses dogma, fear and blackmail to get their way....they've been closing the strait on a whim for decades...war or no war...they do as they please with no fear of consequence... there's no negotiating with these people...they understand only brutal force and force alone
Iranians have had it coming.
Young children acting as human shields on the bridge on Tuesday.
Despicable..... that child does not even know why they are doing what they are doing on that bridge, nor the consequences either....
As I said on another thread, there are a few on here who would say that you are a sadistic bastard if you wanted to bomb a confirmed underground nuclear missile site in Iran, if women and children were posted outside the gates waving their protest flags...
Of course,, liberals are sadistic. The OP is another expression of it.
Liberals hate so much of humanity and they are so full of contradictions.
Remember, peeps, the strikes in question are supposedly crimes of war. So the nut job Iramian regime may influence liberals not to commit crimes of war. Very funny.
The hatred on humanity is so big: liberals are unable to consider human beings as human beings.
So many contradictions.
Liberals told that iranian wealth was Iranian people's wealth, that they should rise up to overthrow the regime and so on... and then liberals turn to destroy this wealth.
When Iranians gather in places to protect this wealth, liberals do not perceive it as a a sad, desperate attempt to protect the iranian wealth, liberals see it as a trick by the regime. In other situations, with the right populations, liberals would praise how brave these people are.
Same thing again: iranians generally have a great consideration for their own country and it is not surprising to find some of them ready to sacrifice their lives and their children's lives in order to maintain the idea they have of Iran.
It is very funny because Trump keeps insisting that Iranians must give up on that perception of their country, it is part of the peace place.
Another contradiction: total war. Liberals introduced the notion of total war and in this regard, what happened is an expression of total war. Total war is a liberal thing. Very funny..
And the hate... Calling these people human shields is as usual deceiving. Human shields are civilian people used by a military to avoid losing military personal lives. This is what liberal Israel commonly does.
These people may be there on their own will in a foolish, desperate attempt to protect iranian's wealth from illegal strikes, the same wealth iranian people are told by liberals it is theirs. The terminology of human shields is inappropriate.
Liberals do not care about human shields, if they did, they would have condemned liberal Israel. The OP is another example of liberal whataboutism.
Liberals are frustrated because this move from Iranian people deprive them from blowing up the civilian infrastructures. That is all. They can not do it, they will probably do it in the future.
Jip, that's the kind of people we're dealing with...and the TDS crowd backs them to the hilt...at least Denny sees the threat in just leaving them be.
The Trumpanzee species have TDS. Most of them are happy-clappy religious zealots- that are more similar to the Arab fundamentalists that modern day man. They talk about the liberal values and teachings of Jesus, but do not want to follow them.
We should dump all Christian fundamentalists in the Middle East where they belong.
They were probably hoping Iran got destroyed.
OR
Anyone can see what is worse...
Most of the world supported Iran over America - it is hard to imagine this ever happening. Although America is no longer the land of the free. Now it is owned by the Oligarchs and bribed politicians that lay the platform for a morally bankrupt disgrace of a human being to be Democratically elected.
This bumbling idiot could cause World War 3. Iran were never going to agree to a deal - or if they pretended to - they will not honour it.
America are bullies - they attack smaller countries without nukes. Anyone can see the way to deal with American aggression is to have nukes. Central American countries need to get nukes, as does Greenland.
Yes you are far more free in Iran.
"Most of the world supported Iran over America"
No, only the stupid planks....what a revelation this war has been...
what a revelation this war has been...
Damn straight
Yes you are far more free in Iran.
Of course not. Any country's population placed under similar international sanctions as Iran will see liberties curbed. Any country in a state of war as Iran will also place liberties reduction on their population.
Beside, once again, there is no care about the iranian population. The afterwards will be ignored as it was ignored in Iraq, Libya, Syria or many other countries.