DB, "removing the head of the snake" is not true. There is a new Supreme Leader. The Regime is still standing.
The new head of the snake will think twice before getting too cocky... consequences is a bitch...
DB, "removing the head of the snake" is not true. There is a new Supreme Leader. The Regime is still standing.
The new head of the snake will think twice before getting too cocky... consequences is a bitch...
The new leader has many heads ...
-
\-
brilliant !!
-
Makes for interesting reading....instead of scratching the surface dig a little deeper
Denny
What happnEd in 1953 had zeRo affect of what is happening at present, Stalin was still in charge in Moscow and the famous Cold War was in full swing threatening Europe - depending on the ME fo rsupply of oil and gas. Britain became not a major eempire - but still had some forces n the world af airs and Chruchill was behind the action supporting the Shah who was threatened by a communist taking power in Teheran.
By 1977 with Carter in charge in the USA and Labor in London - Great Britain became Small Britain and idealism support opponents of whatn was regarded as dictatorship countries, So Little Britain supported the undermining of the Shah and establishment of the Ayatollah regime in Iran. he arse-licking stopped within a month after the new Iran Regime showed their rue colours - it wa snot a Communist dictatorship - it was a radical IsIamic dictatorship. The Ayatollah declared war on anyboidy not supporting radial Islam and especially all Sunni ME countries - not only the hated Western countries,
So where are we at present - the NATO members - other than the USA - h as destroyed their armed forces to be a joke - depending enirely on he USA for their defense and s crfeam hysterically about everything by implementing nothing . Weak political leadership reigned supreme and nobody really care what they scream about, The EU countries economical importance dwindled to a farcical level.
That is the situation at present - not as bad as what is the case in South Africa - but marching gloriously to self-destruction.
.
.
Jonathan Pie with another great summary.
S B, Dennym and BB
A famous quotee was assihned to Mark Twain - but it is not cetain he ver said it:-
If you do no/t read newspapers you are uninformed - if you read newpapers you are mismformed - if ymouread newspaprs you are misinformd,
\Whethe Mark Twain said i afer quopting the above world for word he expl
This famous paradox perfectly captures the modern media dilemma: choosing between total ignorance and filtered, biased, or incomplete narratives. While often misattributed to Mark Twain or Oscar Wilde, the sentiment remains a relevant critique of how news is consumed. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Understanding the Media Trap
Some /of our po/ster developed pettu-hate - So please ch eck youj, factsbefo/re ymou ake a arse hole of arse- hole f yourwlf,
.
sleep deprivation ... ffs. try some cc oil ... see your apteeek
sleep deprivation
Driven by their obsession with the board, he and ButtPlum share a common trait.
We occupy their thoughts without even trying.
"A famous quotee was assihned to Mark Twain - but it is not cetain he ver said it:-
If you do no/t read newspapers you are uninformed - if you read newpapers you are mismformed - if ymouread newspaprs you are misinformd,"
Yes, it's definitely not certain Mark Twain ever said something like "if ymouread newspaprs you are misinformd,"
Thanks for the Jonathan Pie clip SB. One of his best.