https://www.euronews.com/2023/05/24/why-do-disgraced-americans-like-scott-ritter-spout-pro-putin-propaganda-in-russia
Scott Ritter, former chief UN weapons inspector, in front of a
courthouse in the US after he was sentanced to 18-66 months for unlawful
contact with a minor. 26 October 2011
- Copyright
DAVID KIDWELL/AP
By
Una Hajdari • 25/05/2023
Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter is touring Russian
cities and claiming Ukraine will lose the war. Why do he and other
disgraced Americans insist on defending Putin's rhetoric?
Russian
propaganda outlets have loved quoting Americans they believe are
arguing in Moscow's favour ever since the 2014 invasion of Ukraine, and
even more so since the full-scale attack launched in February last year.
While
the concept of Western intellectuals kowtowing to Soviet leadership –
and downplaying their crimes – was relatively common during the Cold
War, it has gained new momentum since Russian President Vladimir Putin
made clear his plans to either break up or occupy the entirety of
Ukraine.
Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector in the 1990s,
and a Marine Corps analyst during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan a
decade prior, is among the cohort of Americans courted by Russian
propaganda sources.
Recently,
he launched a tour of his new book, “Disarmament in the time of the
Perestroika,” in Russia, and presented it in cities such as Kazan,
Irkutsk and Yekaterinburg. The book, he claims, aims to warn the US
public about not seeking out escalations with Russia which could lead to
a nuclear attack and insists the Western public has forgotten how
difficult it was to achieve these agreements in the first place.
'Running into Russia's cold, confining embrace'
For
those with any knowledge of the main political talking points that
circulate in Russian media – some of which might be based on real fears,
such as that of a nuclear-level escalation – Ritter is singing a song
the Russians like to hear.
“People
like him turn to Russia and to the cold yet very confining embrace of
the Russian government because they’re opportunists,” says Natalia
Antonova, a longtime Moscow-based reporter and editor, as well as an
OSINT researcher with a keen familiarity with Russian disinformation
techniques.
“They see a financial and career opportunity by
working for and with the Russians. By that I mean bad Russians, the very
same bureaucrats who are enabling Russian fascists today and are
enabling this attempt at a genocide in Ukraine.”
Antonova is
Ukrainian-American, and for someone who straddles both worlds, Ritter is
an example of a typical disgraced American – often a man – who
discredited himself in the US and now wants to be perceived as a source
of “honest analysis” in Russia as a means to achieve renewed or
increased glory.
“Desperate men like him have frequently come to
Russia to get a fresh start. It’s true that Russians will overlook
anything as long as you’re useful to them. They don’t care,” she
explained.
Ritter
is a convicted sex offender, having been caught exposing himself to
minors online on several occasions. He served a year and a half in
prison. Despite this, he claims he was being targeted by the US
administration for his opposition to the war in Iraq.
“If you
follow the local Russian news as it reports on Ritter’s grand tour of
Russia, in local outlets such as the Kazan or Izhevsk news, none of them
mention his arrest record and conviction,” said Antonova.
“They
don’t even say, ‘oh this man was wrongfully imprisoned, it was a
conspiracy against him.’ They just don’t mention it at all.”
Not
all truth-tellers are welcome in today’s Russia. Last week, 500
Americans, including figures like former President Barack Obama and
late-night television hosts Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel, were
placed on Moscow's biggest list of sanctioned individuals so far.
Wall
Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich was arrested in Yekaterinburg
in March, and Russian officials are continuing to deny the US embassy
access to their citizen.
Ritter, unlike the people on the
sanctions list, “gets a chance to reinvent himself and feel good about
himself again, and the Russians will let him do it,” said Antonova.
What is a tankie?
The
term “tankie” is familiar to anyone with some knowledge of the politics
of the former Soviet Union. It emerged during the Soviet invasions of
Hungary and Czechoslovakia in the mid-20th century as a reference to
those who downplayed the fact that Kremlin tanks were used to suppress
protests and opposition in cities like Prague and Budapest.
It is
common internet slang nowadays, especially among those seeking to weed
out apologists for the Putin regime. You can find tankies of all kinds -
from anonymous Twitter trolls waxing poetic about NATO's expansion into
Eastern Europe, to renowned journalists and academics.
One
of the more distinguished among them is American journalist Seymour
Hersh, once a renowned and revered writer, and known for his
trailblazing reporting on US crimes such as the My Lai massacre and the
torture of Iraqi civilians in Abu Ghraib.
Recently,
he launched a ferocious debate after publishing an article alleging the
US had bombed the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The controversial gas route
through the Baltic Sea was supposed to circumvent countries like Ukraine
and Poland – Russia’s main political opponents even before the invasion
-- in delivering gas to the western part of the continent.
“Some
people, like Hersh, also really got their spirits crushed. He reported
on truly horrifying things that the US military did, like My Lai and Abu
Ghraib. These are terrifying events in US history that are shameful,”
explains Antonova.
Oliver Stone, the US director famous for films
about US presidents such as “JFK” and “W”, has also become part of the
formerly illustrious set of Western figures now whitewashing the crimes
being committed in Ukraine. He produced “Ukraine on Fire,” which came
out in 2014, a movie downplaying the Euromaidan protests that led to the
ouster of corrupt pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in 2014 and
presenting them as a US-led coup d'état.
“That can really break a
person to the point that they kind of turn to the proverbial dark side –
and they don’t even realise it. They’re so caught up in the bad things
the United States have done that they completely demonise the US,” she
said.
Antonova
says that while it is patriotic to criticise your country, these
figures have gone as far as to “lose some of their objectivity and
ability to think critically about some countries,” to the point that
they now “start embracing foreign dictators”.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is interviewed by American director Oliver Stone for a documentary in Moscow. 19 June 2019Alexei Druzhinin/Sputnik
Do Russians secretly want to be liked by Americans?
During
the Cold War, the Soviet Union put a lot of time and effort into
convincing its citizens that they are, in fact, living better lives than
their Western counterparts.
This was coupled with the firm claim
that the Soviet Union was on the right side of history – it had played a
crucial part in defeating Nazism in Europe -- and the idea that it was
the first country with an expansive socialist system that would provide
equal opportunities to all its citizens.
Your average Russian
citizen today still wants the West to recognise that they have something
special to offer – and that countries like the US should treat them as
equals.
“Russians really want Americans to like them. There is a
kind of aggrieved revanchism at play there. They might hate Americans on
one hand, but they want Americans to care about them and like them,”
Antonova explains.
This is why the Scott Ritters, Steven Seagals
and Oliver Stones of the world are welcomed with open arms in Russia –
especially if they can point to ways the US is perhaps worse than their
own country.
“[With Scott Ritter] we have this American who's not
afraid to speak the truth and he tells us what we want to hear. When an
American does that, on a fundamental psychological level, it feels
fantastic and it also reinforces the goals of the officials that
obviously helped him plan his trip,” she continued.
Putin has
invested a significant amount of time in undermining Western societies,
and trying to fight the inferiority complex many Russians feel.
“So when Americans repeat Putinist talking points it means something,” she conclu
Sponsored