RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 Jan 2020, 09:32#41
The irony is that the person coming out of all this with honour, integrity and dignity is Adam Schiff . . . the person that Bozo and the Trumpanzees call a corrupt politician and a liar.
LMAO!
Just for the record . . . before the Trumpanzees start squealing, I'm no fan of John Bolton. He should have had the guts to testify after his subpoena and I don't believe it's any coincidence that his latest revelations happened just before his book launch. A weak, self-serving and opportunistic coward . . . typical of a Bozo appointee . . . but that doesn't change the fact that his testimony will implicate Bozo which is why the Replublicans are so opposed to him being called as a witness. It's a massive cover-up and the cowardly arselicking Republican senators are accountable.
28 Jan 2020, 11:53#43
Bolton’s “evidence” will not change a thing. I have watched the entire defence case until close to the end of Dershowitz’ evidence. The defence has so far done a good job of tearing Schiff et al to pieces. And they have done it all by using the Dems’ own evidence and witnesses. They have not even introduced a single piece of their own evidence. They didn’t need to.
Pelosi, Schumer, etc must be seriously pissed off with Pencilneck and Turtleneck by now.
28 Jan 2020, 13:25#45
I loved the part where they basically used past expressions of both Schumer and Nadler, on impeachment, in evidence in defence of Trump. I wished they would show the expression on their faces at that moment.
They basically used Nadler as evidence against himself. What a tool!!
28 Jan 2020, 17:59#50
@Draad. I have now actually watched the rest of Dershowitz’ testimony and it seems like he left the best for last, so to speak. I wanted to watch to the end but decided to leave it for later because I was actually getting a bit bored with his lesson.
The last part of his testimony was, however, the most powerful of all. It was interesting to watch the other testimonies taking the Dems’ own evidence and turn it against them but then came Dershowitz.
He delivered the most brilliant plea and I believe that any of the Dem Senator, who watched that, and also paid close attention to what he said, and still believe that this warrants the removal of Trump is either delusional or seriously dishonest. Particularly if they bear in mind the dire consequences, for future Presidents, if they were to succeed in removal based on these articles.
28 Jan 2020, 21:07#52
The Bolton story is another “timeous” leak by the New York Times, I think it was.
From what I understand, the crux is that it is based on something that a journo heard from somebody about something Bolton allegedly says in the manuscript of a book that is to be released somewhere in March. Speaking of solid evidence. Sounds like yet another example of dodgy evidence to me.