A Question of Lawyers - you get the honest ones - like Dave and then you get this

Asked to tell the truth that is obvious to all....the OOM tries to attack the messenger. A sad case who in one thread is losing the little credibility he has left. The truth please OOM....there is no rule you have to use the word prediction in making a prediction, none at all.

  "cant say the same for the insult of a side Meyer has come up with - it is not a true Bok side and the only way things will change is if they get thumped week after week, which I predict will happen."...posted in early June

 
"If the Welsh cannot beat this side then I honestly don't know.

We're ripe for the picking."...says Clean Gene. In the very next post Sapp says

"Agreed" and nothing else.

And then Sapp says this, which is a clear prediction:

"The ONLY chance the Boks have of beatingWales is if that useless Morne Steyn is injured in the opening minutes and replaced by a real rugby player in Goosen"

Morne Steyn was not replaced in the opening minutes....so according to Sapp we had no chance of beating Wales.

 So lets sum up....Sapp bets on a World win by saying his money would be on the World team. He predicts a Wales win, with the caveat that replacing Morne in the opening minutes might give us a chance. Without that no chance.

This against a backdrop of his comment that we were going to lose week after week, before the Welsh test.

And to complete his seven straight predictions against the Boks, Vetsak says

"I am going to ram this all down your throat when Oz and NZ beat us in all 4 tests in a few weeks time"

Ram away Fat Man.  

Moffie I am still waiting for my ACTUAL predictions made against the World 15, Wales x2 and Scotland you lying prick.......these little deductions, or conclusions or probabilities do not amount to actual predictions relating to particular games......it does not constitute material evidence of a prediction made by myself for none exists.

I only made 4 predictions and that is a FACT

Now stop ducking and diving and just provide the material evidence of my predictions against the World 15, Wales x and Scotland.......its a simple task really, you either have that evidence or you don't?

Man up old timer and deliver

The ONLY chance the Boks have of beatingWales is if that useless Morne Steyn is injured in the opening minutes and replaced by a real rugby player in Goosen"

This is called a contingent prediction in statistics. You are predicting a Bok loss, short of Goosen replacing Morne in the first few minutes.

Goosen did not replace Morne in the first few minutes.

Thus the prediction is activated. It's very simple. Everybody else sees it, but Mike is lying on his own string calling for honesty.  So why am I not surprised you two fools would lie to save your own skins...it was ever thus.

Headline: Your predictions for Boks v Wales?

Saff's reply : Wales to beat that sad excuse of a bok side.

Debate over! Can we move on?

Before I look like a complete doos! That was 2013 EOY tour. My bad!

I GOT IT WRONG. See, not so hard!

Followed by this post the Monday after the game, conceding to getting it wrong.

I checked the dates this time.

Oh what utter garbage you ignorant old man, that is NOT a prediction now fucking man up and provide material evidence of my prediction, not some pathetic lame.....'contingent prediction in statistics'

Geez you really are one stupid dunce.......find a post from me that says.......I Saffex predict that the Boks will lose to Wales........can I make that any simpler for you.

Now fucking man up and provide

Sharktwat the moral of the story is that you are too fucking stupid to work out the difference between a real prediction and a fictitious one.

Thick as pig shit   

Bwaaaaaahaha Vetsak has got two predictions right out of nine. What a total toss and a major fool. Hell you couldn't be that wrong tossing a coin a hundred times.

Opinionated and wrong, is there a worse combination.