Mmmmm Dave
You seem slightly confused little lad, the issue here is about your blatant lie about never having put an opinion forward, so let's leave the prediction issue alone
See below argument.
SaffexStatus:Hall Of FamePosts: 9959
RE: A Question of Lawyers - you get the honest ones - like Dave and then you get thisOctober 27, 2014, 16:49:55 DA I don't give a flying toss about opinions or statements......the point of argument is whether I made a prediction or not......what part of this do you not grasp stupid man
Now see this
SaffexStatus:Hall Of FamePosts: 9959
RE: A Question of Lawyers - you get the honest ones - like Dave and then you get thisOctober 20, 2014, 17:07:56
....just like I never offered a prediction, I never offered an opinion on the actual outcome of a game other than Oz and NZ.
You maintain here that you never offered opinions about the outcomes of any games besides the NZ or Oz games, as stated by yourself above.
Now below, according to you, this is not a prediction, fair enough then, are you now saying that this is also not an opinion on a game that is not a NZ game or OZ game?
Saffex Status: Hall Of Fame Posts: 9076
RE: Posters predicting a World Win seems to include....June 05, 2014, 16:05:35Yep, the World side is better than the Bok side so my money would be on the World side.
You maintain you never offered an opinion on any other games except the NZ and OZ games, and you also maintain that they are not predictions, so please do us all a favour so we can put this to bed.............. what is this above?
Or this
"cant say the same for the insult of a side Meyer has come up with - it is not a true Bok side and the only way things will change is if they get thumped week after week, which I predict will happen."
Clearly in your eyes these are not predictions, so let's assume they are not for your sake.
A re these also not opinions, since you maintain you have NEVER offered any opinions on games except only the NZ and OZ games
I await your informed response