22 Mar 2014, 01:12#42
Wardad, you are literally to dom to argue with..U remind me a little of a kid with his fingers in his ears saying "na nan na nana" because you not smart enough to understand.
42 penalties per yellow vs 7 Aus and 6 SA...12 or 13 is still ok..15 is becoming questionable but 42 is just ridiculous.
PS..I have lost plenty respect for Craig Joubert..He is not the ref he once was..He is hungry for international matches and tries his best to be perceived as uber fair that he actually blows against the SA teams to prove he shows no allegiance...He is not the best ref anymore..What he did to the French was pathetic too.Not 1 penalty for all their possession and territory..AB's were under the pump and blowing hard!
Yeah, SA might not have beaten the AB's but I guess we will never know..We were robbed of the game that everyone would have wanted to see most..
I dont need you guys on here to justify Bryce's blowing of the quarter..He cheated all game long. This was confirmed the world over..Everyone saw it and the man is no longer around..
PS Wardad..Nice response to Beeno regarding your pigeon english, "if you make more yellow card offences you get more yellow cards ,even a particularly stupid child understands that but then theres you"
Firstly, you dont make them, you commit them and secondly, do you reckon Aus and SA infringe differently to NZL..Are our penalties for offsides, hands in the ruck, late or high tackles different to how NZL commit them??42 vs 6?? Get real knob gobbler
22 Mar 2014, 07:20#43
Too "dom" Bwahahahahaha ! pigeon English ? English is capitalised "u' know ? Dont try being clever when you lack the ammo dopey .And dumbing down is necessary when dealing with you and your mate beandork .Only someone as appallingly stupid as you gets on a blog about 2 ABS taking sleeping pills and starts his boring little rant about steroids and refs .You and your mate beandick ,dumb and dumber ! Must be hard to type and hold his and yours at the same time ,clever boy !P.S. Are you enjoying the grammar rodeo cowboy ?Pidgin [from the Chinese word for business ] English is not quite "Pigeon " English which is what one bird brain would use speaking to another ,hmm...guess that would be appropriate for you and beanhead !
22 Mar 2014, 12:20#44
Dom is Afrikaans for dumb you fuckwit..That is not a spelling error..I meant to say that!
22 Mar 2014, 13:53#45
I know domheid ,you got owned so badly thats all you could come up with ? Done playing with you its like clubbing a particularly stupid baby seal ....yawn ....who needs sleeping pills when your about hahahaha ....So halfwit replies with what ???
MDMonkey D Luffy
Pro6,277 posts
MDMonkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
23 Mar 2014, 08:17#46
@sione lauakis imaginary uncles BFF,
"42 penalties per yellow vs 7 Aus and 6 SA...12 or 13 is still ok..15 is becoming questionable but 42 is just ridiculous"
name me one test where the All Blacks gave away 42 penalties and didnt get a yellow card.
"I have lost plenty respect for Craig Joubert..He is not the ref he once was.."
of course u have, ur a typical crybaby saffa who blames the ref for ur teams being shit.
blaming the ref and playing soccer rugby is what SA do best.
"Yeah, SA might not have beaten the AB's but I guess we will never
know.."
- Boks have won three times in NZ during the professional era.
- Boks havent won at eden park since 1936, before WW2.
- heading into the RWC, Boks had won 10 of their last 24 matches, 41.6%
u might not know, but ur not the sharpest tool in the shed.
All Blacks would have killed the Boks the way we killed the walabies in the semis.
how many tests have the Boks won against the All Blacks since then??? zero, which is still 20pts higher then ur IQ.
"We were robbed of the game that everyone would have wanted to see
most."
saffa logic at its best, the referee is to blame,,,
- Boks losing to the wallabies in OZ, SA and NZ
- for PDV being the Boks coach
- for bizzy starting on the bench and smit starting at hooker
- for schalks burger knocking the ball on leading to the wallys try
- for brussows weak body lasting only 20mins
- for morne missing two penalties
i admit at the beginning of the year i was looking forward to beating the Boks the most at the RWC, but after the wallys won the TriNats, they were the team i wanted to play the most, for IMO they were the All Blacks only threat in the RWC.
"I dont need you guys on here to justify Bryce's blowing of the
quarter..He cheated all game long. This was confirmed the world over."
saffa education at its best.
so where is the evidence which proves it was confirmed the world over???
is this evidence similar to picture of sione lauaki on facebooks is evidence that the every All Blacks is on steroids???
MDMonkey D Luffy
Pro6,277 posts
MDMonkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
23 Mar 2014, 08:18#47
@sarugby.com admins,
apologies for picking on saffa retards.
23 Mar 2014, 10:35#48
Sasuke the cunt
u might not know, but ur not the sharpest tool in the shed.
All Blacks would have killed the Boks the way we killed the walabies in the semis
So now you are some sort of psychic are you? You know NZL would have "killed" SA? The WC is different to any RC game you will see Pressure is different and NZL fold. We have seen it every WC bar 87 when SA were not around. Even 2011 you cunts folded and luckily you had Joubert on your side. France were far better. I will tell you know...As much as you think you know, so do I..AB's would not have beaten SA in the semi..
You know as well as I know what every rugby man thought of Bryce Lawrences performances. You know that..Thats all the confirmation I need..Where is Bryce today?? Is he still reffing??Exactly you dumb fuck!
Sas, please dont think I give a shit about you when I say the game EVERYONE wanted to see the most. You mean fuck all. I dont give a shit if you wana see your brother rub your dads stomach whilst he jerks off rather than the Boks vs AB's but when the coach at the time of the 2011 WC releases a documentary stating its beating the Boks that means the most, then you know for sure who the AB's respect the most. You can enjoy the wallabies v ab's but you are fuck all.
MDMonkey D Luffy
Pro6,277 posts
MDMonkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
23 Mar 2014, 11:05#49
@sione lauakis uncles BFF,
"So now you are some sort of psychic are you? You know NZL would have "killed" SA?"
im no more a psychic then u are, but of all the possible outcomes of a All Blacks vs Boks semi in the RWC at eden park and taking the following factors into consideration,,,
- Boks have won three times in NZ during the professional era.
- Boks havent won at eden park since 1936, before WW2.
- heading into the RWC, Boks had won 10 of their last 24 matches, 41.6%
and other factors i forgot
- Boks had morne steyn at 10
- Boks had steenkamp at loosehead
- Boks had spies at 8
Boks losing was the outcome with the greatest possibility of happening.
why do i think the Boks wpuld have been killed, cos like the wallabies, the Boks are one team the All Blacks never underestimate, they always bring their A game, and in NZ southa africa are just like ireland, good but mucj a do about nothing.
"You know as well as I know what every rugby man thought of Bryce Lawrences performances. You know that..Thats all the confirmation I need."
so u know what i know??? how very presumptuous of u.
just as i thought though, u dont have any evidence, only opinion.
ur lab monkey brain is not smart enough to differentiate between fact and opinon.
"but when the coach at the time of the 2011 WC releases a documentary stating its beating the Boks that means the most, then you know for sure who the AB's respect the most. You can enjoy the wallabies v ab's but you are fuck all."
OMG how pathetic, o_O
everyone wants to be the All Blacks greatest rival, as that in itself is rugby title worth having.
if u cant beat the best, the next best thing is who the All Blacks say are the 2nd best.
enjoy that level of mediocrity and im gald u know ur place in the rugby pecking order and are content settling for the scraps the All Blacks give the Boks, england and wallabies to fight over amongst themselves .