are you going to revert back to your stinking role now that the Boks will be staring down the mighty AB's?
It's just a question.
Captain12,893 posts
18 Oct 2015, 11:03
#1
18 Oct 2015, 11:03#1
Barking Dogs...
Started by Denny2 REPLIES133 VIEWS· 18 Oct 2015, 11:03
Pro2,288 posts
18 Oct 2015, 11:13
#2
18 Oct 2015, 11:13#2
I'll just save Michael the trouble:
If Victor starts the Boks will lose by 80 points, but if he doesn't SA will win by 10. Boks must fling it wide and pass along the line to exploit overlaps, no miss passes because that means you get the ball out slower to the outside backs. No crashballing because that impedes backline play. If you shuffle along the line you can get outside the last defender easily and score plenty of tries. Which is a good thing because Boks must never kick. All kicks are bad and a vestige dinosaur rugby. Rugby has changed in every way over the past few years so you have to forget everything you ever thought you knew about the game. Boks should also give it to Lood. He'll carry the ball like a snow plow through NZ and score a try. But he is so strong he can maul on his own so that frees up attackers! Score! Simples and endut.
If Victor starts the Boks will lose by 80 points, but if he doesn't SA will win by 10. Boks must fling it wide and pass along the line to exploit overlaps, no miss passes because that means you get the ball out slower to the outside backs. No crashballing because that impedes backline play. If you shuffle along the line you can get outside the last defender easily and score plenty of tries. Which is a good thing because Boks must never kick. All kicks are bad and a vestige dinosaur rugby. Rugby has changed in every way over the past few years so you have to forget everything you ever thought you knew about the game. Boks should also give it to Lood. He'll carry the ball like a snow plow through NZ and score a try. But he is so strong he can maul on his own so that frees up attackers! Score! Simples and endut.
Captain49,914 posts
18 Oct 2015, 14:42
#3
18 Oct 2015, 14:42#3
Yep the Barking Dogs have been a touch....er....inconsistent. Dave's rationale for why we would crush Wales was grounded in his review of individual player clashes and he concluded we would win all but about 3 or so. Hence an easy game....one has to laugh.Perv thought we were going to lose to Samoa by 20, but beat Wales by....he gave various numbers....let's pick 15.
— END OF THREAD —
