FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  For those who doubt Frans could play Bok 10....

For those who doubt Frans could play Bok 10....

Started by Mozart54 REPLIES677 VIEWS· 23 Mar 2014, 15:14
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
25 Mar 2014, 15:32
#41
25 Mar 2014, 15:32#41
 
Huh??

What are you rambling on about?

Clearly you have a fetish for clean shaven domes. I suppose a comb-over sends you right over the top, huh?

Does it help you get your rocks of, Faggot??

Perhaps I should change me avatar pic. Wouldn't want you wacking off to my fine features now would I?!

Sick pervert.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2014, 17:07
#42
25 Mar 2014, 17:07#42
 Cleancut
Have you ever seen a bald-headed donkey?   Don't worry about Mozart's gimmicks.
He is dead serious about Francois Steyn at 10.  This is not the first thread on that score he started - it must be about the tenth one.  Baiting would consist on one or even two threads - not the amount of bullshit he poured out endlessly on that topic.
Every successful goal kick results in endless praise singing and absolute ignoring of what Steyn otherwise produces.   It really is a joke - but Mozart must be in a serious state of illusion in this particular case.      

BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
25 Mar 2014, 17:16
#43
25 Mar 2014, 17:16#43
Moz please tell me you are not having a go at someone for being bald? Please tell me I have misunderstood something? 
Holy shit! T hat is a level of childish I have not seen since the days of Praat-Ek-Luister
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
25 Mar 2014, 17:24
#44
25 Mar 2014, 17:24#44
Wehe, this is peanuts. Bluebok, did you not see Moffie's 2 year long foaming and vitriolic rant against Dave because Dave dared to suggest that he was half an inch taller than Moffie? 
If you think the spiteful and deceitful old toad is being childish because he's having a pop at baldness you should have seen that tirade against Dave's height! The lengths (no pun intended) that Moffie went to to try and prove what was effectively half an inch in height were honestly mind-boggling!
I don't know who this "Praat-Ek-Luister" person is (quite a cool name though) but I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts he's not half as childish and juvenile as Moffie.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
25 Mar 2014, 18:43
#45
25 Mar 2014, 18:43#45

Er Bluebok check back along the string and you will find CC started this by calling me a faggott, I'm  not a faggott, but he does appear to be bald. So who do you think won the argument?

 

I don't start arguments , but I don't shy away when they are started. 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
25 Mar 2014, 18:52
#46
25 Mar 2014, 18:52#46
 I'm not a faggot, but I find this homophobic behavior insulting. Homo, faggot and moffie are rude and insensitive terms and I apologise for using those terms in this post. Just as bad as racial slurs. Over and out.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
25 Mar 2014, 18:57
#47
25 Mar 2014, 18:57#47
Damn right.....Redneck is the worst case, which is ironic because he tries to present himself as this socially enlightened person. Poor CC is just lost in a testosterone mist. These guys are dinosaurs. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2014, 23:01
#48
25 Mar 2014, 23:01#48
 Mozart
I am not interested in your personal arguments with other members.   What really interest me is how come you ignore Steyn's poor all-round performances in the games he played at center or flyhalf.
In practice Steyn had a good first game against the Bulls this year and then deterioration set in.   He buggered up badly against the Hurricanes and after that he became progressively poorer in every subsequent game.
His only redeeming quality was his kicking at goal - in all other aspects if the game he was putrid.   That was the situation on the field of play and was supported by the match stats.
Why do you only deal with his kicking at goal and ignore the other aspects of his game?
Incidentally Plumtree and the general public in KwaZulu-Natal saw the same tendencies last year in the four games he played in and then dropped Steyn from the starting line up for non-performance.   I know Steyn is a favourate of White - but that will not help his cause if he keeps on under-performing.          
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
25 Mar 2014, 23:22
#49
25 Mar 2014, 23:22#49
So you think he had a good first game, and then he became poorer. But 5 experienced rugby journalists thought this in Round 4
 Team of the Week - Round Four: 15 Jesse Mogg (Brumbies), 14 Rod Davies (Reds), 13 Jean de Villiers (Stormers), 12 Par McCabe (Brumbies), 11 Lwazi Mvovo (Sharks), 10 Frans Steyn (Sharks), 9 Cobus Reinach (Sharks), 8 Ben McCalman (Western Force), 7 Schalk Burger (Stormers), 6 Marcell Coetzee (Sharks), 5 Wilhelm Steenkamp (Western Force), 4 Flip van der Merwe (Bulls), 3 Werner Kruger (Bulls), 2 Stephen Moore (Brumbies), 1 Tendai Mtawarira (Sharks).
So who am I going to believe, some old pensioner from the Natal Provincial Administration, or 5 qualified rugby journalists and my own impressions. Ummm....game over.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2014, 23:58
#50
25 Mar 2014, 23:58#50
The twat is back.............Clown..............we thought you had topped yourself and rejoiced.........bit premature sadly.......do us all a favour and fuck off......it was nice without you.......you weren't missed I can assure you
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
26 Mar 2014, 00:31
#51
26 Mar 2014, 00:31#51
Amen to that Dave.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
26 Mar 2014, 06:13
#52
26 Mar 2014, 06:13#52
Mozart
You can believe what you want and so can the journalists - but what about the extremely poor stats of Steyn.   We all know journalists are blinded by things like goal kicking - just like you - and ignore the rest of a player's performance - even atrocious performances.
So here is the stats of Steyn for that game:-
Steyn0/0179/10/81303022/20/010/0
All the above indicates a player -
*   that was ineffective in carrying balls - 8 carries for a total gain of 13 meters'*   who lost possession of the ball twice *   who was atrociously poor in defense -missing 50% of his attempted tackles; and*   who gave away a penalty to boot.
I have no problem with his goal kicking - his only redeeming factor - the rest of his game was an insult - especially bearing in mind the fact that he is supposed to be a senior player in the team.
I am not only looking at the stats - I also looked at his performance on the field and in some ways it was even worse than reflected in the stats - wild and inaccurate passing was common and very dangerous since it handed over possession to the opposition and the recipients get the blame for it  in stats - not the passer.   And then there was the case where little Faf ran around him and he did not even attempt a tackle.  

The fifth round performance was even worse than the fourth round.  
You may wish to accept stats when it fits your purpose and ignore it when it does not - but I look at overall performances on the field of play and if the stats support what I saw - I am fully prepared to accept those as factual as well. 
Steyn's goal kicking was good - the rest of his performance and insult to what is expected from a flyhalf.     



   
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
26 Mar 2014, 09:57
#53
26 Mar 2014, 09:57#53
 
WHAAAAT??? You mean to say you don't like me, Stupid??

Gasp!!! Who would have thunk it?

Now, now, Stupid ... no need for that kind of language.

Made any progress at the AA yet ... or are you still waking each morning with the taste of vomit on your breath?

Draad ... do me a favour ... hush up!  

Faggot ... argument ?? ... what argument?? We were merely chatting about your stupidity and my supposedly erotic bald head!!!

Oh and by the way ... I think you'd have to do a little better than that to win an argument.

Great to see you and Stupid holding handies though.

I seem to have a knack of bring folks together ... then again ... is that a little strain I'm detecting between you and Redneck??

And to think of all the groundwork I put in to reconcile you two.


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Mar 2014, 10:16
#54
26 Mar 2014, 10:16#54
Moz unfortunately that is hardly likely to be a picture of wee cc. Here's more the images I have of him 




CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
26 Mar 2014, 11:05
#55
26 Mar 2014, 11:05#55
 
Thanks H enpecked ... your too kind!!!
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news