Hahahahaha....slob. How can this....
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 14:52
#41
10 Sept 2015, 14:52#41
Fourie du Preez - is he fat or not
Started by clevermike58 REPLIES979 VIEWS· 09 Sept 2015, 11:32
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 15:07
#42
10 Sept 2015, 15:07#42
Possibly see himself as this:
Pro2,549 posts
10 Sept 2015, 18:04
#43
10 Sept 2015, 18:04#43
not happy with putting a personal photo once, which is completely out of place but it seems that you have many dificulties to understand it, you put it again and this time accompanied by jokes.
Do you have any limit or can you sink even lower?
This is pure bullying, very sad when you see it made by childs but from an adult,...... man, it's the lowest,....... from the scv m of the human being
Do you have any limit or can you sink even lower?
This is pure bullying, very sad when you see it made by childs but from an adult,...... man, it's the lowest,....... from the scv m of the human being
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 20:08
#44
10 Sept 2015, 20:08#44
Apparently you have no understanding of the English language...the subject said this: " I do not mind the photo either". Is that confusing to you or is this a just a chance to puff up, play the righteous man and try and get some revenge for all the times I have wiped your face in it. And frankly who cares.
Pro2,549 posts
10 Sept 2015, 20:30
#45
10 Sept 2015, 20:30#45
as I said before, one thing is to have the permit to publish or reproduce an article where there's a photo and another very diferent to use that photo the way you did,....... 80 years old bully-boy,........... the lowest,...... what a shame!!!
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 20:40
#46
10 Sept 2015, 20:40#46
Rubbish if you agree information can be put on here, actually solicit information to be put on here, you have lost the veto on when it will be reproduced. This was a vanity play that has backfired....and your politically correct attacks are painfully transparent.
Coach57,555 posts
10 Sept 2015, 20:46
#47
10 Sept 2015, 20:46#47
There is nobody as low as Skunk Hitler is - you are a miserable useless piece of Sh!t in any event.
Captain40,032 posts
10 Sept 2015, 21:02
#48
10 Sept 2015, 21:02#48
SIGH!
Pro2,549 posts
10 Sept 2015, 21:27
#49
10 Sept 2015, 21:27#49
"Rubbish if you agree information can be put on here, actually solicit
information to be put on here, you have lost the veto on when it will
be reproduced"
Oh, yeah? since when? since you say so, bully-boy?
let's make an experiment if you are so sure. Take a photograph of a child, get their parents permit to publish it in an article (in internet or whatever) and then use the photo the way you did in this post.
And start thinking how many $millions you'll have to pay,.... if you are also not put directly in jail
Oh, yeah? since when? since you say so, bully-boy?
let's make an experiment if you are so sure. Take a photograph of a child, get their parents permit to publish it in an article (in internet or whatever) and then use the photo the way you did in this post.
And start thinking how many $millions you'll have to pay,.... if you are also not put directly in jail
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 22:51
#50
10 Sept 2015, 22:51#50
Your photograph on the internet is no longer your personal property to control. So you have to prove libel. Calling somebody fat, who is fat is not libel. In fact F du Preez and Alberts would have a much better chance claiming against the Pervert.
Try to avoid exposing your ignorance sonny.
Captain30,741 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:25
#51
10 Sept 2015, 23:25#51
Sent you an e-mail about Dave.....wow?????
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:30
#52
10 Sept 2015, 23:30#52
It think he should produce it. I give him permission.
Pro2,549 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:41
#53
10 Sept 2015, 23:41#53
"Your photograph on the internet is no longer your personal property to control"
Don't invent. In internet photographs, videos, writtings, songs, music in general, etc. have exactly the same legal coverage as in any other format,....... property rights, image rights, etc, etc,......... other very diferent thing is that there are sites where you refuse to your rights when uploading, Facebook and similars,......... but this is not about legal issues, this is about you using a personal photo to try to humilliate a member of this site who was posing a perfectly legit question,....... this is the lowest and has nothing to do with having the permit to reproduce an article where that photo was included. Nothing
Don't invent. In internet photographs, videos, writtings, songs, music in general, etc. have exactly the same legal coverage as in any other format,....... property rights, image rights, etc, etc,......... other very diferent thing is that there are sites where you refuse to your rights when uploading, Facebook and similars,......... but this is not about legal issues, this is about you using a personal photo to try to humilliate a member of this site who was posing a perfectly legit question,....... this is the lowest and has nothing to do with having the permit to reproduce an article where that photo was included. Nothing
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:50
#54
10 Sept 2015, 23:50#54
Wrong again....the photo was first shown separate from the article after which Perv said:
"I do not mind the photo either".
You would be more credible if you weren't trying to insult me and weren't ignoring Perv calling me Hitler, snake in the grass, piece of s..." etc.
But feel free to try again.
Pro2,549 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:55
#55
10 Sept 2015, 23:55#55
"You would be more credible if you weren't trying to insult me and
weren't ignoring Perv calling me Hitler, snake in the grass, piece of
s..." etc."
so you are the victim now, bully-boy?
that's so funny,....... try again you yourself
so you are the victim now, bully-boy?
that's so funny,....... try again you yourself
Captain49,914 posts
10 Sept 2015, 23:59
#56
10 Sept 2015, 23:59#56
No I'm never the victim. I am merely pointing out your inconsistency. I don't ask for help, for quarter, for posters to be banned....I deal with things as they are. You for example are a gnat....gnats occasionaly need to be swotted, but they aren't worth taking seriously.
Pro2,549 posts
11 Sept 2015, 00:28
#57
11 Sept 2015, 00:28#57
diverting the discussion?
I don't give a sh¡t about how good you think you are for "dealing with things as they are" and yes, you were impersonating the victim
I don't give a sh¡t about how good you think you are for "dealing with things as they are" and yes, you were impersonating the victim
Captain49,914 posts
11 Sept 2015, 00:35
#58
11 Sept 2015, 00:35#58
So you say...but five little words would say otherwise to anybody with a grasp of English..."you would be more credible". It's about you not about me....comprende?
Pro6,663 posts
11 Sept 2015, 00:40
#59
11 Sept 2015, 00:40#59
Far out this whole site is becoming rather boring with all this bloody nonsense as you said earlier BP.I like reading about whats heppening with the boks ,you know all the wee tidbits we dont see over here that add interest to our game .But this is just ridiculous.
— END OF THREAD —
