I cant support this shit Bok side and I have had enough of the JJ bashing!
I am leaving this site
Saffex, its all honesty, jokes aside and everything. Dont go bro.
We are all frustrated with Meyer's selections but be honest with yourself. Have you known any different from SA rugby since 1998?
This is why we will spend our lives challenging the AB's but we will never be better than them consistently. Never.
We are fooling ourselves that we can be number 1 for any length of time because we have greedy pricks higher up than that fly under the SA rugby banner yet are so out of touch with the team and what goes on. Until you have passionate rugby men from ground level up, you will always just have people in jobs looking out for themselves and thats what we have.
You are kidding yourself too that you can break ties with the green and gold. Every year we are left disappointed yet every year we come back for more..
AB's dont realise it but they have it so easy. They have the right ppl in the right places and their biggest worry is when to blood the next great!
Saffex
It is frustrating to deal with the non-thinking on this sit - I know that and often thinks about leaving myself. Instead of being listening to reason - the members often enough go on and think that they are the only knowledgeable people about rugby and rubbishing some players and supporting the non-performing players based on prejudice.
While I myself question some aspects of the defence of Engelbrecht - I recognise that he has positives as well. Lets look at the rubbish they support instead of Engelbrecht:-
* Juan de Jongh - the worst SA Super 15 defender - statistically proven - misses tackles because he is such a strong tackler - never hear such bullshit in my life before. He buggers up in tests, does nothing on either defence or attack - but to some he is the answer at 13;
* Jacque Fourie allows Davies to run past him like it is unbelievable and in general did squat in the Welsh test other than to follow up a Du Preez kick from an off-side position - pick up a ball from a favourable bounce and flip pass the ball back to Du Preez who was in the clear and scored a try. If there was a TV review of the try - the rubbish would have had serious negative consequences for the Springboks - but that is ignored. Slow as a carthorse - he made all his tackles against the poor Scottish players - so now he is "organising the defence" of the Springboks backline. Fourie had a 3 meter advantage over Maitland who had to turn around after a kick ahead - had to start running whilst Fourie was running full out - he got 2 meters ahead of Fourie in the end - but Fourie "kept pace" with him - an outright lie.
If you point out that Morne Steyn is by far a worse defender than Engelbrecht - you are committing lese majeste - the latter can do no wrong. Bakkies Botha did squat against the Scots - proven statistically - but he is a worthy Springbok because he is a "leader". Meyer win tests against poor opposition - despite rubbish selections - but he can do no wrong.
A person can prove factually that they are wrong in what they write on this site - yet they keep up the rubbish they dish out. Its frustrating I know - but I tend to treat their opinions on performances as a joke in bad taste. Get the hell in at times - but it is useless - so it is better to stay around - and laugh at their prejudiced hogwash.
Their latest favourite is Fourie
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!
Are you looking for a pity part, Stupid??
Ok!!!
Noooooo .... no ... no ... noooooo ... don't do it Stupid.
PUHLEEEEEAAASSSSEE ... DON'T GO, FATS!!!
Oh pleeeeeeeeaaase!!! ...
That's a laugh, Mike.
We've been dealing with you haven't we? We've had to suffer your ignorance for ages now.
You clearly rate yourself as a bit of an intellect. A "thinker" as you put it.
Pffffffffffhahahahahaaaaaaaa ... yeah right!! Post upon post upon post says different, Dumber!!
You are easily the most foolish poster I've come across. You think repetitiveness qualifies you as an intellect. It doesn't Mike. It qualifies you as a nag. A tiresome nag!!!
You get the picture?
So do me a favour will ya ... stop flattering yourself ... Dumber!!!
Cleancut
Ignorance is bliss - and you must be the happiest clown in existence. Keep it up - I laugh at your absurdities - similar to what Mr Bennett said in Pride and Prejudice.
Why don't the dumbasses here get that people have different opinions on things? THAT IS THE POINT OF A FORUM! Just imagine how exciting it would be here if we all agreed on everything all of the time! That's right, IT WOULD SUCK! To all those who get mortally offended when people disagree with them...GROW A FUCKING PAIR!
In short, if you don't like a place where people challenge your thinking, then piss off, no skin off my back!
I remember that tune ... that's going back to the 80's.
KC something or other ...
And raise the average IQ on this board by about 5!
But it won't be permanent. He'll only be away until the next time he logs on. After the "because I said so" and "FACT" failed to impress as arguments to support his opinions, he is hoping a flounce will create some sympathy.
As I indicated!
LOL!!!
To show the limited intellect Stupid has ...
He says this one's a "c#nt" and that's one's a "thick prick" and that one's "thick as pig shit" and so the list goes on and on ... and after all is said and done, he actually thinks if he threatens to leave us, head down, all teary eyed, sulking with puffy lip and all, we the "c#nts", and the "thick pricks" and the "thick as pig shits" ... will plead with him to stay.
It's hilarious.
It also shows he's prone to thrashing about on the floor in a full on hissy fit when he doesn't get his way. Like a 3 year old child.
Totally cracks me up.
Saffex, you staying or going is not going to change the fact that JJ is not a test quality defender.
If you think there are other SA rugby websites out there where the members all think JJ is a test quality defender then good luck finding them. Wherever I've looked the comments are pretty much the same as on this forum . . . JJ is a decent enough attacking centre but he's a poor tackler.
Can't believe you supported the Boks during the Twakkie era but now you can't support them anymore when Heyneke Meyer is in charge.
We are just realists in the fact that JJ is not where an international centre needs to be defensively. You dont have to agree but dont run away because ppl dont share your thoughts like a baby!
You also say you cant support this Bok team..They are winning Dave..What more do you want right now?? They are hopefully working at a plan to beat the AB's and thats why is vital we look past JJ right now..You saw for yourself how he let Barrett coast on through...
You bunch of muppets, as if I would leave or no longer support the Boks.......if I left it would leave you sad lot holding hands in a circle agreeing on how great it is to have a bunch of old farts in the side or how wonderful Morne is.
You need someone with a rugby brain on here
What part of the exclamation mark did you not get - ! = joking
The poor dear has recovered from his emotional drunken binge and after a night with his head in the toilet bowl ... feels better.
Probably still has remnants of his toilet bowl episode on his work shirt and I can only imagine the halitosis.
Duh!
As predictable as his player ratings that are compiled three to four days before the game.
Really? That's new to me. I always thought one used a smiley face or a "lol" or a "LMAO" if you felt you had to tell the reader you were joking about something, I don't think I've ever heard of an exclamation mark being used to denote a joke or something tongue-in-cheek . . . but maybe that's because I'm a muppet.
Tell me Saffex, over the years I can recall literally hundreds of posts of yours where you placed the word "FACT!" (with an exclamation mark) after many of your comments . . . eg. "JJ is a world-class tackler, FACT!" or "Morne is crap", FACT!" or words to that effect. Does that mean you were just joking every time you said that?
Wow! That changes everything!
Some people just need a sympathetic pat.............
on the head..................
w ith a big hammer.
Yes Rooi maybe in sunny SA you lot are a bit backward.......but if you sent someone a text or e-mail here with a ! at the end - you are joking, not that I really give a shit as to whether you think I was joking or not.
I am telling you it was a joke, if it does not wash with you then so bloody what. Take it or leave it
It's a feeble attempt at saving face.
He threw his toys and as is normal with every drunk ... regrets his actions ... after the fact.
Now it's a matter of repairing the damage as best he can and by the looks of it ... it's not going well ...
What a joke.
The exclamation mark or exclamation point is a punctuation mark usually used after an interjection or exclamation to indicate strong feelings or high volume (shouting), and often marks the end of a sentence.
An exclamation mark can also be used in brackets after a statement to show that the writer finds it funny or ironic: She says she’s stopped feeling insecure (!) since she met him.
The exclamation point ( !) is a terminal punctuation mark in English and is usually used at t he end of a sentence with no extra period. It can turn a simple indicative or declarative sentence into a strong command or reflect an emotional outburst.
Use an exclamation point [ ! ] at the end of an emphatic declaration, interjection, or command.
"No!" he yelled. "Do it now!"
An exclamation mark may be used to close questions that are meant to convey extreme emotion, as in
What on earth are you doing! Stop!
An exclamation mark can be inserted within parentheses to emphasize a word within a sentence.
We have some really(!) low-priced rugs on sale this week.
Saffex
The stooges are at I again - it is evident that there combined rugby brain is about the size of a pin prick and that they cannot understand when people think about issue and dare to express a different opinion.
I can put the clowns on this site into one group and the mostly thinking people into another. The first have one thing in common - they believe in their own rank stupidity and think others should do the same - they thrive on one incident in matches to be career-defining in respect of players they dislike - the players they like can bugger up matches on their own and not a word of true discussion would follow.
The thinking people express their own opinions on players and does not accept horse manure as facts - even where they differ they have reasons for differences.
You will find that the clowns are always supporting Meyer - the thinking people do not support some of his preferences for players he used to coach nearly a decade ago without any regard as to their present performances.
My advice - stay around and laugh at the folly of the fools.
How you feeling, Stupid??
The room still spinning?
You cleaned up your upchuck yet?
You low life piece of scum!!
Saffex
Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 6168 RE: I am leaving this site
November 21, 2013, 14:25:56 The only fact is that you are a twat - the lengths you go to, to try make a worthless point is really funny - you poor dumb Dutchman
Jaaaa swaer. Onnosel Soutpiel! And please, I am not insulting you are swearing at you. It is a joke. Note my ! at the end.
Well, I just asked a simple question, Saffex, and you haven't answered it.
I'll try again . . . does that man that all the other times you used an exclamation mark at the end of a sentence you were just joking?
It's a simple "yes" or "no" required, that's all.


