Jake’s World Champion Boks ranked highest among Bok WC teams

Mostert missed no tackles in the WC….this from the bible ESPN stats guru

Time stamps. It's not impossible for stats to be wrong, or to interpret something inaccurately, but you have to prove it. Tell me where it was and I'll put it up. You have a long history of being wrong Saffex. Proceed with caution though your mouth will be bursting to sound the trumpet call to disaster. 

Mozart

I checked the above comment about Mostert coming from the be nch - for your info the only game in which Mostert came on early was in the final due to an injury of De Jager.   In the other 4 games he played on average less than 25 minutes in matches.   So as per normal your statement was BS 

.      

Mostert did more in his time than Lood has done in his whole career. Lood missed his time as a plodder in the 40s. 

Himmel - another unproved BS allegation.  Mostert never ever achieved anything in rugby compared to De Jager.    De Jager has physical abilities way superior to anything Mostert produced in Rugby - whether playing at lock or in the no 7 loosie position.   Mostert  is and always was  totally ineffective in breakdown ball protection and recovery.     Whenever he ws involved he was pushed off the ball by even backline players.   His open field tackling was seriously defective and players ran through him like he was not there/    In the AB away match in 2018 it happened twice during the match.   It happened twice in 2019 in crucial tests against Argentina and the AB's.

When it comes to tackling of players Mostert's tackles are invariably ineffective since players go forward if Mostert tackles.    Dave mentioned two cases in the WC match against England  where he made tackles and lost his grips on tackled players.  The one ended up in Malherbe finally making the crucial tackle less than 2 meters out from the tryline.   The other case was in the same period of constant English attacks on the tryline he made anther tackle attempt where he was not shown in the tackle stats where the player concerned ran past him and he ws on the ground without touching the player concerned  - Youngs - who ran past him and was tackled by Du Tout.

Aside from that Mostert in the attack in the final he caused the breakdown just before halftime in the WC final when he spilled the ball and the attack ended on that spot.   Luckily for the Springboks there was a scrum penalty awarded to the Springboks putting them in a 12-6 score at halftime.   To be frank De Jager is a much more effective lock than Mostert ever was and will be.   

The final was won by the destruction of England backline attacks by De Allende and Du Toit tackles and unlike in the AB test between the AB's and  the English the superiority of the English backline contributed to the English victory - in the final the England backline was totally neutralized by the named two players.

Live with it you write BS on site you have dreamed up and cannot prove anything of the allegations made by you.   The claims that De Allende walked into space when he scored the try against the Welsh and your statement that Louw, Steyn and  Mostert won the WC for the Springboks were the most ridiculous claims ever made on site.  LMAO                                                           

Silly assertions, not worth bothering about.

Whenever facts contradict your dreamed-up assumptions it is silly according to you.   LMAO.   

What facts? "Lood arez 100 tymes bettah dan duh Mostert man"? Compelling stuff, yet I'm not quite convinced. 

It's like comparing Roman concrete to asbestos. Mostert being the former. 

i HAPPENED TO EB AT THE 

l'Grande Merde

" How many more chances does a coach who had 37% need before they prove themselves? He had a win against Australia, and a massive tactical blunder through the Lions series. No, he was a failure. There is no evidence that he was a success."

 I happened to be at the second test against the Lions.   There waqs no blunder of the Springboks in any test against the Lions - least of all the second test against the Lions.   The Springboks scored 3 tries - Honibal did not convert a single try - even though the conversions was not particularly difficult,    He also missed 2 rather easy penalty kicks.   That as the only problem in that test.   The Lions t eam got five penalties and a drop goal for 18 points,   

So was the technical error to use Honibal to kick at goal?  

McGeechan stated that he was surprised that the Boks didn't test the Lions fullback under the high ball. There were a few other things he found surprising, he also pointed out an inability of the coaching team to adapt and change. We lost the Lions series primarily through poor coaching. As we have learned already, you love poor coaching. Your two favourites being a man who has hidden behind his subordinate whilst contributing nothing constructive and the man who was fired for losing a Lions series and achieving a 37% win record. You are drowning Mr Clever. I'd thrown you a life ring, but donkeys don't have opposable thumbs to grasp with. 

So what did you have to come up with?    Fuck but you are din beyond belief.   The Springboks played attacking rugby and made tactical kicks    Do you understand what I wrote at all about the key Durban match.   We lost that test because Honibal missed 5 kicks at goal - 3 try conversion and 2 penalties.   Was the poor coaching resulted in those 5 missed kicks?   The Springboks won the third test by the widest margin the Springboks ever won against the Lions.   So where the hell was the poor coaching?

You are too dumb to understand rugby at all.      

The Springboks were well beaten. The much-vaunted scrum was dominated, the lineout was dominated, the Lion's defence held firm. We ran without any imagination, too tactically stunted to test the Lions where they were weakest because Coetzee, I mean Carel, was adamant he wanted to run the Lions off their feet. 

l'Grande Merde - can ymou read and understand English?    When facts are provided you aways return to BS allegations without any proof whatsoever.