Mr White's doing alright

So let’s introduce a bit of reality:

Wales 115 passes, 36 kicks/ Boks 67 passes,  37 kicks.

Wales 61% of possession/62 % of territory.

Wales should have walked the game....but for one statistical category:

Wales 74 of a mere 90 tackles they had to make/ the Boks 147 of 158  tackles they had to make. The Boks missed 5 less tackles despite having to make 68 more tackles. 

So there you have it....the Boks defended their way to victory. If you are going to use stats Wanker, use the right stats.

Your description of the game against Wales were and are utter  BS,   You claim the  Springboks kicked the ball and did not use it for attacking purposes and the o nly reason they won was because their attack was useless,   

The one thing that nobody ever disputed  was the issue of defense, and I pointed out that you were talking tripe..   Defense was part of the game plan and Nienaber was the coach dealing with that issue.        

Other  than  defense the Springboks despite a huge a huge advantage in ball carries  was only  credited with the brilliant  try by De Allende,   Three  try-scoring opportunities were fouled up om the game - two of those opportunities were the result of foul-ups  by  Le Roux with a ball knock-on with an open try-line ahead of him and the second by him through a poor pass.   

The attacks on Erasmus as a coach are the actions of a complete rugby imbeciles and every time  you wrote things prove that you are one of them,           

So just the usual, stale, witless accusations and no comprehension of the stats. Was the team that forced 147 tackles or the team that forced 74 tackles the team that was on the attack. No don’t bother answering, we have heard it all before.

Listen dimness - look at the distances covered by the ball carriers for examples.  The fact is the Willie part of my report was confirmed time and again by review/

The number of passes and carries means nothing at all since no real results in the scoring of tries were achieved.    Players can pass and carry balls ineffectively and the result will be zero.    That is what omlette comes up with an argument and it is as stupid as only you and he could be. 

Fact is Welsh players  carried the .ball 114 times for a 182 meter gain - an average gain of 1,6 meters per carry - the Springboks carried the ball 71 times for a 296 meter gain -  an average gain of circa 4,2 meters per carry and was much more effective  in their carries.   The stats means nothing - the results everything.   Think about it that way ignorant  stooge.            

My god Mike you are pathetic. Rooinek treats you like garbage. But you ape his  pathetic ‘omelette’ name. Have some pride man.

OK - I meant AO - but that should not make a difference to the idiocy of both of you. 

Actually, the interesting thing is that the origin of das Omelett is that Herr Omelett (Rooi, amongst other names) was quick off the trigger thinking he spotted a mistake, and didn't realize I was speaking German. A gaff ensu ed. I found that it wasn't difficult to goad the arrogant one into a mistake, the watch some foot stamping as it tries to cover its tracks. Herr Omelett was exposed . If the little dear prefers, I can use Dame Schneeflocke instead. 

As for José? Lood has never dominated since the 2014 Scottish test and two runs against Japan. That's it. He is slow, lethargic, devoid of any skills. Had José truly been a great assessor of talent and a great tactician, he'd have started RG, removed Steph from the squad, placed Mostert at 7, removed Kolisi from the squad, elevated Dan du Preez, started Louw, started Esterhuizen, removed Damian from the squad, elevated Serfontein as 12/13 cover. 

José gets out-thought tactically often. His limited gameplan is not sustainable. It never will be. His entire coaching record is mediocre, and once Nienaber's work is taken out of the conversation, we are left with nothing. José adds nothing but man-management, which might not actually work once things started going wrong (hence him running away from the limelight and working through a figurehead Coetzee and Nienaber). 

This debate has been easily won each and every time it surfaces. 

Aug, 

Must we bring the special one into this?

Is nothing/nobody sacred to you?

Nothing! 

Carelessly not spelling a word correctly is not as embarrassing as thinking Trump could immediately allow Biden to save lives....Peeper.

AO

You have never won any argument as to rugby issues  because you do not understand the game at all and can only be regarded as total rugby illiterate.   .  You heard somewhere about a rugby game plan and you have no idea about what it entails.   That is why you came up with a Meyer game plan when it was entirely absent from usage while he was coaching the Springboks.   

And the ‘omelette’ quote Peeper was from Mike’s post.....he aped your name, but unlike you he apparently got it right.

Well Lister, there's always you. Where did Serfontein go? What of JJ, the greatest 13 since readmission? Goosen? Lambie? Pretorius? Watson? So many names of kids that never made it. Sure things, "class acts". To top it off, the old hasbeens you wanted to give the boot carried a mediocre coaching team to a WC. That's the cherry on the kak cake. Very funny.

The chief of "rugby idiocy" must test with Lügnerin! 

Funny how idiotic the rugby knowledge of  that idiot AO  really is.   He praised the poor coaching of Meyer and Coetzee - who subsequently coached club teams and got fired for gross incompetency and will never get any real coaching job in future other than perhaps school teams because they were so totally defective in coaching and attack the coaching competence pf Erasmus.   He still have to explain how incompetence as club coaches makes people competent  tp coach on test level.

We all strive to support certain players and we all make mistakes in players we support,   But we are not coaches and we do not have our views in team selection impacted on team performance,

So lets get to the issue of the WC raised in his latest post,    What are you talking about village idiot?    Meyer took a  squad of 31 players to the 2015 WC and of those 8 were unplayable in tests because they were selected on reputation and not performance,    In their first game some of he unplayables played and they lost against Japan.   And what did they achieve otherwise - zilch and that resulted in Meyer's coaching contract not be renewed by SARU,  What did they carry?  Nothing at all,   No game plan - no players selected on the bases of performance - caused havoc in 2015,

Then we have the 2019 World Cup winners - a real team that in the final demolished their English opponents,   From the demoralized team ranked seventh in the world Erasmus within 18 months built up a team that won the WC and became the no 1 team in the world,    That was achievement and  that is where we are today,   So Erasmus is being criticized endlessly and hos two failed predecessors praised by the biggest rugby fools ever,    That ois the very real joke we have on site,                      

"Carelessly not spelling a word correctly is not as embarrassing as thinking Trump could immediately allow Biden to save lives....Peeper."

...or indeed that Biden would be able to "save lives".

As we learned, Biden has pledged a "walahoo", which Trump can't do, apparently. That with "cancer moonshine", the lives of Americans will be in good hands.