Ole Cruz/Tomas

The worst elements on this Board are those who thrive in personal attacks on  members and bring nothing of rugby value to the Board.    I understand that sbs,com closed down because of exactly that - so now you come and spread poison here.

Until you contribute something constructive on this Board my advice to you is piss off - you ignorant and useless bastard.     

poi -e

The worst elements on this Board are those who thrive in personal attacks on  members and bring nothing of rugby value to the Board.    I understand that sbs,com closed down because of exactly that - so now you come and spread poison here.

Until you contribute something constructive on this Board my advice to you is piss off - you ignorant and useless bastard.     

 Poi-e, I've just got off the blower with a mate of mine here in Hamilton who also happens to be a Liaison person with the Chiefs.

He confirmed our suspicions that Tomas the Tank Engine could hardly speak any English (pigeon at best!) so there is no way that he and Ole Cruz are the same person.

Anyone who writes as well as Ole would be a fluent speaker as well.

Sorry to burst your bubbles  Mikey et al!!

 OK - Lets summarise this one

Ole Cruz claimed he was Tomas and he may have taken all of us foir a ride in that regard.  However - whenever he made a rugby contribution on this site ut was more insightful than what we generally see on this site.  

There is one thing though and it has everything to do with what we try and do on the site and that is to -

*  discus rugby-related issues; and

*   not use the site for personal attacks on members.

We all go overboard from time to time on the latter issue - but most members talk riugby and not personal issues here.   There are however members who use the site purely for personal attacks on other members and here poi-e and ceradyne are typical examples of the filth we have as some members.   We all try and poke fun at each other site members - they represents the scum that spread poison without any rugby contribution ever.  

That is the type of thing that destroyed the NZ forum and most NZ members have mentioned it before on this site from time to time.  We discus the moles that come and do the same thing here = yet we have our own sheisters here as well.

A few years ago one member had the audacity to spread all the personal information on Mozart all over a site and it caused major problems - so lets keep those off the Board and discuss rugby issues.

One last thing - whatever can be said about Ole Cruz - he knows more about rugby than almost all members we have here and it showed in his contributions.   That is why I would have liked to see more of those here - and less of the crap ished up by some sheisters we have as members.          

 poi-e

I may be an idiot - but until I see some real rugby contribution from you,  I will always say one thing - you are a scumbag and somebody not needed on this site.  

Rooinek

We are unfortunately stuck here with some scumbags as members.   If one tries to discuss rugby issues - they come up with attacks on fellow-members,  There is a slight difference between for instance Sun Tzu and some others.  Sun Tzu deals with his garbled view of players and rugby issues - but he at least discuss rugby issues.

Most of the rest are purely here to cause trouble with members and NEVER raise any rugby-related issues.   poi-e and ceradyne are two of the worst in that category.   When you point it out - they said they would not discuss rugby matters with you - but then they discuss it with nobody on this site - so we must view it as a campaign against all members.   One thing is for sure - they know nothing of rugby and everything about poisonous drivel.      

Best thing is to ignore them and their false identities and accept that the only contributions they are able to make  are fit for flushing down a toilet.  .        

Ddraad

I do not have an issue about being corrected about issues where I have made mistakes - it is the way in which people handle corrections that us the issue.  Some corrections are abusive and nasty and is really is unacceptable.

To carry on to the point where you  drive a member away - like poi-e was successful in doing in this case - is just not acceptable.   That is where I draw the limit.   He made the point that ole cruz is not Tomas and then went on a hounding exercise - even on his facebook - asking him to be a friend.  That was off this site and had nothing to do with it - why should he have responded positively in any event? . When he did not respond on request we got another salvo  on this site.  

I believe he was unethical - he can make the claim and ole cruz he can deny it - but to try and hound tomas by other means is just not acceptable.   I have met Saffex in London and spoke on the phone with Mozart and some members send each other e-mails - that's fine - but to go and thrust one-self onto a fellow-member without mutual consent and try and discredit a member - that is not fine.

I think that the problem I have with the two members here is clear.   I can remember that Ceradyne was a member previously - Beeno calls him windpomp - and I had some serious differences with him then.   Now his comments are only reactions to what I wrote on the site - I have yet to see a thread started by him -and the only comments he virtually ever made is about what I wrote.   Same with poi-e - he is completely silent on the site and then re-appeared virtually only when I made a comment and then try and make a liar out of me.

That kind of action is bound to get me mad at them.   We do not need members like that on this site.     I regard both as absolute poison and as far as I am concerned they should F- off.   There is one thing certain - I am not going to respond in future to their shit postings when I have written something ort started a thread on something.      

 Windpomp

F-off - to put it nicely,