Paris burns (2)

 Wrong as always rooitwit just becauee you are too dumb to grasp it the existence of God is poven. Nothing cant create anything. Stephen Hawkin as the worlds leading atheist brain has made you all look like the FOOLS you are. BwahahhaahahhahahahahahahahaThen rain falling on rocks doesnt produce life. Why is the no life before teh cambrian explosion. Why to tree trunks cut through billiosn of years of fossil records. HahahahhahahaHow did the human male and female evolve?
Then the human genome of more than3 billion letters in precisley the correct order couldnt possible just happen as all are realising. Netheir can all the incredible amounts of information encoded therein.  Theobviosu conclusions of irrdicble complexity has floored poor evolutionsts.Nor can you have an infinite regression etc etc.Lets face facts you atheists are a laughing stock these days, With your heads buried in the sand and your butts in the air all that one can do is kick your sorry buts Hahahahahahahahahhahahahaha  Rooitwit you half wit how about a few answers. But I exepct more gruntings from this primitive oak.

 Well given most people on the planet believe in a god....the proper scientific way to set up the null hypothesis is for the disbelievers to prove that God does not exist at the 95% confidence level. Are you following me RooiAAS or has this gone right over your booze befuddled head again?

 Rooi and Traditionalist, don't want to get into a silly philosophical argument.  If I have to pick a scientific stance, based on evidence,  I'll rather go with Einstein and Hawking than you two, Hawkins and Dawking. Yes, there is no proof, but probability favours the most simple solution, and according to Albert and Hawking, that implies something extra physical. ..ie something extra physical. ..ie God....I'm not saying it's the Christian or any other proposed diety...just saying that science does not have all the answers and rejecting God is just as unscientific as the opposite. Agnosticism is the only scientific alternative to theism at this stage. Atheism is not scientific, it pretends to be, almost as much as creationism. 

 Events with extremelly low probability happen at every single moment.

delete

"Events with extremelly low probability happen at every single moment."
True, but science don't get to pick which to except and which to discard.

 While Obama stalls as best he can these are the voices being raised in Europe.Poor ou Plum the rotten and and warpd DUD will be appalled.

Sir Bentley Blower, London, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

Given the disgraceful, indeed dangerous conduct of the EU President Junckner over his refusal to review the EU's policy of mass uncontrolled immigration of 'refugees' the people are right to be concerned for their safety. The left are up to their usual tricks of trying to say that the terrorists of the Islamic State of Syria and Iraq are nothing to do with islam but thankfully the time has long since passed when anyone would waste their time countering such fatuous drivel. The left are irrelevant and will be ignored. We know that ISIS are islamists and we know that the only way to stop them is through the use of force.

ReplyNew302876Click to rate

MrNoSpin, Ripoff Britain, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

Her views are not extreme. Public safety must come before political correctness. The lefties can shut up and disappear.

ReplyNew513758Click to rate

Rosered1, Manchester, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

Well she would get my vote.

ReplyNew352536Click to rate

NineHoursAway, Nottingham, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

I'm glad the far right are gaining popularity, really glad....I don't want any refugees or asylum seekers in the UK......Not one!!

ReplyNew502837Click to rate

Chris1479, Berlin, about 19 hours ago

It wasn't the Front National who killed all those people, it was Merkel and the rest of the Left.

ReplyNew342806Click to rate

oak_tree, field, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

It's come to something when protecting your borders and bothering about the security of your own citizens and their way of life is now a hard-right policy. Or to put it another way, the first duty of government - the security of citizens and their values - has been positioned as an extreme thing to do.

ReplyNew162214Click to rate

Agree with Vlad, uk, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

We had better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims. When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslim minorities are not Russians." Perfect !!

ReplyNew23997Click to rate

wednzdayboy, sheffield, United Kingdom, about 19 hours ago

My ideal date...love to talk politics with her over a few kronenbergs..

ReplyNew20896Click to rate

cx9, solihull, United Kingdom, about 20 hours ago

Prophecy unfolding before our eyes.Google "european union bible prophecy"

ReplyNew38811Click to rate

ironlassie, Glasgow, about 20 hours ago

things they are achanging.

ReplyNew14799Click to rate

Jamie6471, Atlanta, United States, about 20 hours ago

Trojan horse? Countless waves of majority male refugees do not share the same values as the West does. Shocking that people want security and reason from their governments.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3320841/Paris-terror-attacks-pave-way-march-Far-Right-Le-Pen-demands-immediate-halt-new-migrants-France-PEGIDA-hopes-draw-record-crowds-tally-tonight.html#ixzz3rmKram95 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 Ahhh!!! Beenz! You just stuffed up the margins! I can't see the RHS of the page no more!

 Yes me too Draad wonder what happened.

 Yes me too Draad wonder what happened.

Actually, since the answer is not known there is nothing to prove nor disprove. But, if you want to be rational then you have to say that the onus of proof rest with thr group making the claim. Beenis' straw man argument, as convincing as he thinks it is, doesn't even get off the ground. In his mind, the fact that science cannot yet explain something, is 100% proof of God. Actually all it means is just that, science can't explain it yet, maybe never, but that's all. He claims he can PROVE God exists...though his holy book fundamentally tells him that no man will EVER be able to prove God exists since it will nullify the need for faith...which is the "building block" of his religion. Moronic. This entire debate makes no sense because God cannot be proved nor disproved. If we had some sense, we would be discussing faith. If Beenis had some true Christian moral, which he blatantly doesn't, he would instead talk about his faith. Instead he wants to prove what idiots non-believers are. Maybe, many Christians don't want to talk about faith because deep down, they know they don't have it. I dunno. So, are we talking about terrorism or are we gonna get dragged into yet another meaningless argument where nothing new will be said? Personally I would like to hear from you Moz, on why you don't believe that there was an intentional false pretext for the Iraq war. The reading I have done has pointed directly in that direction. So, do you have some information or do you base your opinion on a gut feel?

Who cares what happened, just
edit your post and delete what
you posted and the margins will
return to normal.

Twit!