Sormers little men get slapped

The game is no longer for little men, let alone a whole backline containing midgets but for de Allende, possibly the best centre on the planet right now.

The way the physical Brumbies backs slapped the wee Stormers about was embarrassing, not to mention the lack of imagination shown by the side as a whole.

Good to see the back of useless Coetzee and hopefully with his departure we will see a real coach who will see the merit in getting rid of insults like Lleyds and de Jongh for a start.

Etzebeth, Kolisi, Kitshoff, Malherbe and de Allende were loan rangers in that pathetic Stormers effort 

 Kolisi was utterly hopeless, Carr was utterly hopeless. The guys who got slapped around were the small loosies who were totally dominated at the breakdown. The Stormers lost this game because of the breakdown, the lineouts....where again the Brumbies killed us at the back dominating our small loosies.....and because Leyds made some stupid mistakes and was badly fended once . Bur the fend on Leyds was no worse than Kuridrani's fend on de Allende......fact.

Dave you are bloody stupid, you have to be to write this rubbish every day.

What utter rubbish, Kolisi had a physically imposing game.....he always breaks the advantage line......Carr had a less than impressive game.

Kolisi was very good.......Vermeulen and Schalk were missed.

The issue had very little to do with the forwards and everything to do with useless Lleyds being exposed like no tomorrow and de Jongh on his usual AWOL mission - did he play?

Moz you are the one that is fucking stupid.....stupid enough to blame the loosies when it was clear for ALL to see that your little hero de Jongh was yet again an insult......but the worst of the lot was little Lleyds.......its your blind ignorance that keeps telling us its ok to play all these little guys. 

What utter fucking rubbish re de Allende's miss.......he was the best defensive centre on show in that game, not to mention how brilliant he was on attack....he made 7 tackles missing 2.......compare that to your useless hero de Jongh who made 4 and missed 2.......what about the Brumbies centres with Kurandrani making 6 and missing 5 tackles, closely followed by the 12 with 5 made 3 missed.

The issue with the Stormers were their pathetic little backs with de Jongh 4/2, Lleyds 3/2 and being pathetic under the high ball and Catrakillis making all of 3 and missing 3.

Therein lies the issue......it had stuff all to do with the breakdown. I'll give you the line-outs where Mbonambi was pathetic.

Wake up man, the issue was the tiny Stormers backs being treated like kids playing a man's game

Just to put the record straight regarding the utter ignorance regarding Kolisi's display.

He gained more metres than Pocock, 31m vs 25m, they both only beat 1 defender and Pocock was the only one to miss a tackle with 10/1 unlike Kolisi who made 8 and missed none.

Kolisi had a good game as he has all season.....always gets across the advantage line and I clearly remember a good turnover won  

Utter rubbish who beat him at the breakdown then......name the players......what utter crap.

Kolisi was the second best loosie on the field in that game....the best was the Brumbies 8. He never steps away from contact, that is a lie.

He secured as much ball as Pocock did but made more of an impression than Pocock did in the game. Kolisi was without doubt better than Pocock and that's a fact.

Kolisi never makes an impact in the line-outs, for he is not a 7's backside......only a complete fool like Coetzee would play Kolisi at 7 with Rhodes at 6.......mind blowing stuff.

Lets just have a look at Fardy for the Brumbies at blindside.....5 m gained, zero defenders beaten, 8 tackles made, zero missed.....Kolisi owned him.

Letwat you ignorant twit.....DA was the best defending centre on the day.......7 made 2 missed, compare that with useless de Jongh with 4 made and 2 missed......not to mention the Aussie pair with Kurandrani making 6 and missing 5, while the 12 made 5 and missed 3......wake up you idiot.

Lets not get into how great DA was on attack....for that would expose your rugby ignorance even further.......but why not be a sport and talk us through how poor DA was with ball in hand.....entertain us you ignorant twit  

Ah so there is an excuse for de Jongh but none for DA......so what was de Jongh's excuse for being so poor with ball in hand.......did he actually play?

Could it get further apart.....de Allende gained 118m, made 4 clean breaks and beat 12 defenders......your mate gained all of 6m and registered a big fat zero with clean breaks and defenders beaten......what exactly do you see in this little guy......can you not begin to comprehend the fact that 87kg does not work at outside centre.......not at any level other than school boy rugby