Click on this link to particpate in a relevant rugby related matter:
OK - Lets summarise this one
Ole Cruz claimed he was Tomas and he may have taken all of us foir a ride in that regard. However - whenever he made a rugby contribution on this site ut was more insightful than what we generally see on this site.
There is one thing though and it has everything to do with what we try and do on the site and that is to -
* discus rugby-related issues; and
* not use the site for personal attacks on members.
We all go overboard from time to time on the latter issue - but most members talk riugby and not personal issues here. There are however members who use the site purely for personal attacks on other members and here poi-e and ceradyne are typical examples of the filth we have as some members. We all try and poke fun at each other site members - they represents the s[removed] that spread poison without any rugby contribution ever.
That is the type of thing that destroyed the NZ forum and most NZ members have mentioned it before on this site from time to time. We discus the moles that come and do the same thing here = yet we have our own sheisters here as well.
A few years ago one member had the audacity to spread all the personal information on Mozart all over a site and it caused major problems - so lets keep those off the Board and discuss rugby issues.
One last thing - whatever can be said about Ole Cruz - he knows more about rugby than almost all members we have here and it showed in his contributions. That is why I would have liked to see more of those here - and less of the crap ished up by some sheisters we have as members.
Hi...
again!
July 01,
2013, 19:32:31
Hey guys! Sorry for going MIA (twice in a row now)!
You probably forgot me. I used to be Cruz, from Argentina.
2012 and 2013 have been immense for me in so many ways that it kind of overwhelmed me in the end.
I'm looking forward to debating some more with you lot. I'll have more free time now (moving to NZ soon) so let's hope I can sustain the habit of posting regularly.
Mike
Thanks mate. I am not used to posting in Forums so the habit kind of goes away after a while (short while, I'll admit!). But this time I intend to stick around.
My exams went pretty well! Thanks for asking. I am indeed furthering my career as player. I was called to the U20 squad and had the immense pleasure of playing the JWC, which was a marvellous experience. A massive step for me as I finally faced top notch opposition. I think I did a good job overall, but "good" does not cut it. I now know in depth what areas of my game I need to improve. I'm moving to NZ soon as I have been contracted by a franchise there, with the intention of being groomed for a future competition. It will be quite hard as said team is full of outstanding players, so getting actual game time is a bit far fetched short term. But my main goal is to embrace the special training NZ has to offer, especially with regards to the individual skills the guys there learn from a very young age.
Yep, my Dad spends several months a year in Clifton. I want to drop by and catch a few Stormers games, or maybe WP games. Love 'em.
Indeed, Los Pumas did not do well at all during the tests. But such an outcome was bound to happen if we [removed]yse the situation. 21 of Argentina's best players were forced to skip the international window, since the contract forces them to have a 4 week vacation prior to undertaking the physical preparations in Pensacola. As a direct result, the players called up were third-stringers, with most of them having experienced Vodacom Cup Rugby as the highest echelon in their Rugby careers. The ones that do play in France were in really poor form, and it showed. On the other hand, the English "rookies" had plenty of Premiership experience, so the difference was bound to be notable. Even then, I think some areas of the game ought to have been better. I am very critic of Phelan's tenure and I feel Los Pumas are horribly undercoached. They could do with a Super Rugby coach (which is exactly what is being pursued right now). Some of the names that are being toyed with are: Graham Henry, Jamie Joseph (highly unlikely due to his poor season with the Highlanders), the Waratahs' Michael Cheika (coached Leinster and Stade Francais, where he became really close to several Argie key players and authorities), and John Kirwan. There are some local names in the mix as well, such as Mario Ledesma, and Gonzalo Quesada.
RE: Hi...
again!
July 04,
2013, 13:42:58
Thanks for the nice words guys!
Whoever wrote that article -- I owe you some money! Hehe.
Bluebok -- thanks mate. Will make sure to share some of my current and future experiences with you guys. There's always something to learn out there.
oimatey -- Thanks! Indeed the Chiefs are massively organised and from a technical point of view, they work like a Swiss watch. I don't think a single day will go down without me having learnt something from these amazingly talented people.
sebastienchabal -- My dream is to represent Argentina. To contribute to the National team, whaever my role may be. I'd be happy to sweep the floors in the changing room if that helped them. Argentina is such a beautiful place. Bariloche, man! Lovely place. Perfect weather, fresh air... lots of asado, wine, and criollos hojaldrados con manteca!
Blobbok -- No worries mate. I refer to myself as an Argie when speaking English. Some people don't like it but that has more to do with the Falklands War than with any sort of personal aggression.
Beeno -- Hehe, you funny man. I've always admired Jake White. Not only is he a technical genius, he has great organisational skills. I love what he did with the Brumbies. Not only did he improve them from a technical and tactical front, but he also made them believe in themselves to carry out their game with vigorous guile and intent.
You can read it on this thread
http://www.ruckersforum.com/forum.cfm?threadid=5380
The noun referring to one who takes an assumed identity in order to deceive is variously spelled imposter and impostor. Impostor has the edge, and it is the form recommended by most English reference sources, but imposter is not wrong. Not only is it nearly as common as impostor, but it is also nearly as old. Impostor came to English from the French imposteur in the late 16th century,1 and imposterfirst appeared almost immediately thereafter.2 And though the -or spelling has always been more common, imposter has always been present to some degree.
RelatedAdapter vs. adaptor
Adviser vs. advisor
In fact, imposter is more common than impostor in some areas of English. In a search covering a few dozen of the most popular blogs in the English-speaking world, for instance, the ratio of imposter to impostor is about 6:5. Imposter is also a little more common than impostor in 21st-century Australian and New Zealand news publications that make content available online. The two forms are neck and neck in British and American news publications from this century. Meanwhile, in a Google Books search—which covers millions books, journals, and magazines—limited to 2000 to the present, impostor remains about three times more common than imposter.
If you came here looking for a simple answer, go with impostor, but only because that’s the spelling you’ll find recommended in dictionaries, usage guides, and such, which makes it the safer choice.
And this might be game, set and match for the pedantic gnome. This is how I picture the AAS sloping off the site after this latest humiliation....imposter indeed!
