If Dense would wipe the floor with you then I have to ask, do you even know how the different pieces move?
The permanent Liarmike......liar thread.
If Dense would wipe the floor with you then I have to ask, do you even know how the different pieces move?
Dense plays his matches with the assistance of a computer programme!
Well, all I know is that he has been playing chess for many years. I have spent more time on theory than actual playing. Of all the openings, the Ruy Lopez is the only one I spent time learning. Anyone with years of playing experience should beat me. Especially anyone involved with online chess communities.
It must be a pretty crappy computer programme in that case.
Why would anyone need a computer programme to beat UrineRooi when it's half the fun doing it blindfolded.
Come now Dense, if that is true then why have you avoided the question I repeatedly asked you on this thread and several others?
I'll refresh your memory:
"Oct 25, 2016, 12:43
Wehe, why not tell the whole story, Dense? Why don't you mention the real-time games we first played (on your website) and I smashed you 5-0 until you started blubbering?
Why only mention redhotpawn (which is not real time and low-lives like you could conceivably use computers) rather than the real time games where it's impossible to cheat?
Huh Dense?
Anyway, what is your redhotpawn rating at the moment . . . hang on . . . let me check . . . 1500?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I have a 9 year old nephew with a higher rating than that!
Like Klown, I would bet any amount of money that I'd wipe you off the table in a face-to-face game where you have no access to computers or openings books.
Or this:
"Oct 25, 2016, 13:06
Ah, no record . . . so it didn't happen?
Dense, are you denying we played some real time games on your Yahoo site before I told you about redhotpawn?
Or this:
"Sep 14, 2017, 13:53
Dense has been cowering in a corner since I asked him a question on this very thread almost a year ago.
The trembling jellyfish is yet to answer my question about the 1st 5 games he and I ever played (in real time rather than correspondence where someone of his low character and poor breeding could conceivably cheat using a computer).
Or this:
"Sep 15, 2017, 07:19
As usual, the pathetic coward blows a lot of hot air but doesn't answer the question.
Dense, you and I both know why you always duck my question about those first 5 games of chess we played in real-time. You have built up this big lie about your supposed chess ability and you can't lose face now by admitting you were reduced to making blubbering little excuses like "I don't know why you always win because I always have the better positions". Yes, you took two games off me in correspondence chess . . . but we also know that unlike real-time chess, that's a form of chess where a person of low character could get help from a friend or a computer. Not so?"
I mean really, that is a lot of times I asked you to confirm we played some real time games and that's only from that thread.
So come on now, Dense, you can't have it both ways. You can't claim to be so much better than me without at least answering my very simple question . . . and you and I both know what happened in our real time games on your Yahoo site, don't we?
Oh and just by the way, Dense, what would you say if I told you I changed my chess.com name, challenged you to a few games and cleaned out your clock again for you without you even knowing it was me? Hmmm?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Not again......how many times do we have to go down the same old well documented boring path.
Lots of copy and paste from old threads.....boring. I've provided all the necessary proof.....where's yours? Get over it loser, next time I kick your miserable ass it won't land in next week, it will land in next year.
"Oh and just by the way, Dense, what would you say if I told you I changed my chess.com name, challenged you to a few games and cleaned out your clock again for you without you even knowing it was me?"
Again, where's the proof......point me to a game(s)....or otherwise just eat your crow.
If you agree then just post a reply saying something like "yes Rooinek, I promise to finally answer your question if you put up the proof" or words to that effect.
Deal?
Ummmm . . . hate to break it to you but the whole board can see you're being a coward, Dense.
I have some things to do but I'll be back in about an hour. Hope you've summoned up the courage to accept my deal by then.
He's probably waiting for Moffie to make an appearance later in the day so the childish and deceitful old fop can squeal "game set and match" and make his crimson-faced little Gimp feel better again.
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Oh and Dense, if you're busy frantically going through your chess.com games to see who I might have been (and assuming you ever summon up the courage to show your ugly face on this thread ever again), I can tell you that we played 6 games and it was 4 wins to me, 1 to you and 1 draw.
Crash goes the chess whiz dense denise. Whatever will he say now!
Oh and my revelation that I hammered Dense 4-1 more recently on the chess.com site was only made today so maybe the drunken old fool and his fawning little Gimp had better settle that one too.
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
You seem to be labouring under the delusion that I feel anything but contempt for a childish, vengeful and self-important old liar like you.
I thought we'd settled that?
Dense has run away in tears like a shrieking little crybaby and I suspect he's going to pretend this thread never happened . . . but we'll see.
I hope he's okay . . .
Moz, Thanks but you really don't have to bat on my behalf, his bluster doesn't bother me, truth be told he only fools the ones who want to be fooled You have him nutted, I have him nutted and so did the late Hawkeye(Devil's Advocate). It's as Hawkeye said when he calls you a jellyfish or a coward he is only describing himself and we all know he disappeared from the board for quite some time after Hawkeye kicked his miserable ass into the middle of the next millennium. I'm not fooled by his condolences either, we all knew that Hawkeye had passed, why, because Ceradayne was kind enough to post the news in the Rugby Section, he came along with stale news and used it to feign sympathy. He's worked it out he has one less formidable foe to face hence the reason he now reappears full of bluster as Rooinek not as Koos Kombuis.
The reason I decided to withdraw myself from the argument, which BTW he started, is because it's stale, his insults as you say are 15 years old...... stale.... and we all know it's going to end up with him dragging family up onto the board......all very predictable.
The Chess argument is repetitive, the games go back to October 2008!!! See the chart. How much more boring can anyone be I ask with tears in my eyes.
As predicted he has followed me to a new site which I had recommended to Clean Cut. Note he says he has played me 6 times, beaten me 4 times nyaaah nyaaah and that he had conned me by playing under a different nick. Well that's awfully funny ....another barefaced lie. Thing is I'm playing under a different nick as well.......so here's the thing.....let's ask the barefaced liar to state my new nick....this should be fun. All we have is his say so of wins....no proof.
I have nothing to prove to The most miserable Loser, obviously his lost a lot of sleep since I wiped the floor with him and by the sounds of it his misery will continue for many years to come. As for the far-fetched lies that I'm a cheat and that I use a computer programme as well as the assistance of friends....the simple truth is I don't, if I were then I would be on a much higher rating than the one I'm on.....the rating he so scorns in one of his above posts. My rating varies on different sites from between 1400+ to 1700 and I have beaten the odd higher ranked player, the highest being 2150 but it would be a one off. I'm just an average player and the reason he spews bile is because his rating is much higher than mine.......I can almost feel your sympathy for His Royal Misery
Here's the chart just so you can see the dates of when the three games were played......how borinnnngg!
Urinal MintGame over3805 Nov '08 18:05InfoGame WonArchiveUrinal MintGame over4227 Oct '08 05:34InfoGame WonArchiveUrinal MintGame over4610 Oct '05 00:16InfoGame DrawnArchiveI'm over an out before he starts slagging off on my family .
If he is so good at chess, he should stay on Chess.com. The whole rugby thing, it really isn't going anywhere.
Check and . . . ummmm . . . mate!
Having fun yet, Dense?
Are you going to sit there trembling the whole day until Moffie pitches up or are you going to man up and confirm to me directly whether I have answered the question you asked and whether I'm right?
Then . . . maybe . . . just maybe, you can finally answer the question I've been asking you all these years about the blitz games we played on the Yahoo site!
I suspect you're overstating your ability somewhat . . . but I suppose you need to. After all you did once say that chess is "your life" whereas for me it's an occasional pastime that I've never really put that much effort into.
Klown would certainly be able to confirm Dense's name on chess.com if the trembling little jellyfish is too gutless to confirm it himself.
Klown the not-so-CleanCut?
Yes, Klown aka Clean Cut. He played a few games with Dense on chess.com. He could confirm that Dense plays as JakeyRe on chess.com.
You'd think Dense would answer it himself given that he asked me to give his chess.com name (and called me a barefaced liar) but he's scuttled off since.
I'm afraid I agree with Cloudy.
And I hope he stays away. Repulsive specimen
Cloudy how beastly of you!!!!
Dr Moz, Denny aint no fiend of mine, he burnt his bridges long ago. Think on balance ou rooitwit is probably right. Dense is ducking the challenges set by rooitwi t.
Let's wait and see if Dense confirms that the name he asked me for is correct.
". . . so here's the thing.....let's ask the barefaced liar to state my new nick....this should be fun."
I've answered him. The new nick is JakeyRe. No sign of Dense sin ce I answered his question. Not sure he's having as much fun as he thought he was going to have.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Oh do shut up you pathetic old fool.
Your sad little Gimp has already told you that he doesn't need you to "bat" for him and this has got sweet stuff all to do with you . . . so let the little chap stand on his own two feet and confirm if the name he asked me for is correct or not.
I can wait. I've waited more than a decade for Dense to summon up the courage to admit what happened in the blitz games we played on his Yahoo site so I can wait a little longer for his confirmation that he used the name JakeyRe on chess.com.
I think everyone can see for themselves who is answering the questions on this thread and who is ducking and diving . . . so no need for your pompous, ignorant and childish little views for now, Moffie. Let your little Gimp speak for himself and then afterwards you can help him wipe all the egg off his fat crimson face.
Okay?
More from Rugby
- RugbyScotland dominate the stats48 REPLIES · 193 VIEWS
- RugbySpringboks vs Scotland - Monday retrospective26 REPLIES · 154 VIEWS
- RugbyUnder 20 Springbok team to play the Under 20 England team i the RWC semi on Mondat14 REPLIES · 107 VIEWS
- RugbyMonday Morning Team12 REPLIES · 91 VIEWS
- NewsIreland Test Reveals All Blacks' World Cup Fixes1 REPLIES
- NewsReferee Decisions Overpower Player Impact in Rugby1 REPLIES