What was it we heard about Victor

clevermike
 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 21749RE: What was it we heard about Victor
March 07, 2016, 14:23:09

They are not National Newspapers by any norm - I should rather have said Provincial or regional newspapers.

 So a small regional paper "broke" this story about Matfield losing millions in a Ponzy scheme
Not the Sunday Times or any other national paper..... a small regional paper did.
Ok Mike
"However, whether the Ponsi issue was true or not" 

Well, is it or isn't it, where is the proof?
When you make a very bold statement and question the integrity of certain individuals and that the South African national rugby coach intentionally took a player like Matfield back, purely to help his buddy recover from a devastating financial loss, you better at least come up with some proof when challenged Mike.... surely you can see that
If not, then this fact of yours lays just as flat as CC's intelligence on this issue

Rooinek
 
Status: Senior player 
Posts: 3251RE: What was it we heard about Victor
March 07, 2016, 14:36:16

What is it about Dumb Ass that whenever he posts anything on here it's always accompanied by so much sanctimonious sputtering?

Does anyone else suspect that this tedious Kamp SS mole is posting his monotonous and holier-than-thou rubbish on here to intentionally lower the tone of our forum . . . or do you think it's possible someone can be this sickeningly sanctimonious all the time?

 The rot started when you signed up......
JalapenoKirchnerRooinek
There is only one reason you attempted all these aliases..... it's because under your usual name, you have never been able to make real friends, just enemies.
So I completely understand how you were forced into doing these multiple identities, but the essence of your posts, and your dogsh!t like personality soon came through again and you were exposed as per usual for the twat you really are
I do pity you Rooi..... really I do

 To have made these allegations and invented the facts, would be sick indeed. Find the article and post it Mike. Clear your name.

"Dofdoos
IOL is not as big as News24 - who is owned by Naspers - which is an International Organisation with assets and investment all over the world.  Some of their subsidiaries are Supersport and DSTV  - so that tells you what you know about anything dofdoos." 
Fark Knows. You are such an easy target. Now, for the third time..... read this again:
"Both the Daily News and the Natal Mercury are IOL newspapers, so they are part of one of the biggest media groups in SA. In fact, they are the part of the second biggest newspaper publisher in SA and are owned by an international Irish based media company, Independent News & Media Plc."
Done that? That was what I posted in the first post on this argument. Pay attention to the underlined part and try to remember the part in bold. 
Now read this part again (there is a subtle, but important difference):
".......the largest publisher of print material in South Africa......."
Got it? Have you spotted the subtle difference?
Now think about what you said. I am talking about this:
"IOL represent some smaller English newspapers and is small compared to News 24 that has a much wider spread of coverage."
And now for  the grand finale. Let me remind you about this again: 
"The above is just meant to be a bit of banterand isby no means meant to be the start of a whole new lengthy argument."

Have you taken your Prozac yet?

 Still waiting Mike....find the article that claims Matfield only came back to recover money lost in a Ponzi scheme.

The Sarries locks were second string......their first choice locks play for England