Albert Einstein's letter
All religions push the same agenda as the Jews. They are the one true religion and God's chosen people. They offer the one way exclusive ticket into heaven, and everyone else end up elsewhere. As Einsten says, a childish pastime . Humanitarism, science etc is the future.
A paleo diet is good for some, as it appears to be man's natural diet that has evolved over the last 5 million years from the time chimpanzees became carnivores. The theory is, Chimpanzees became scavengers and ate the remains of other animals prey, sometimes even by smashing the preys skulls with rocks to get the remains. The extra protein led to growth of the brain, which increased the usage of tools. As evolution continued "man's" jaw continued to become smaller and smaller, and his brain became bigger- and perhaps the explanation why wisdom teeth do not fit in most peoples mouths.
A paleo diet seems scientifically to be the best diet, but a high carb diet is a more recent thing over the last 10,000 years. (The beginning of farming). It seems scientific to say a good diet is filled with protein, fibre- with minimal sugar and salt, and carbs.
As for religion, it has been a scapegoat to justify war since the start of time. It was a necessity in the past to organise people, or even the evolving monkey into tribes and groups. It gave them a law, or code of ethics which helped evolution into human society.
With the world becoming global, it seems to have served its natural purpose, and can be replaced with rational thought, and where possible quantifiable reasoning. Problems will be solved by shared answers of people, not conflicting religions that are monolithic in nature with extreme emotional bias.
What you consider sciences weakness Mozart is what I consider its strengh and why it is far superior to religion and that is the fact it is willing to admit when it is wrong and as new facts arise it see that as a victory.
I cannot see the day that science can answer every question but at least it is working on it.
Religion has so many errors in it you could sail a super tanker through most of it but still the preachers spew their lies ad nauseam from the pulpit while proclaiming if its written in the bible it must be true. How do educated people in this day and age accept these obviously false and im possible claims as fact.
Teaching of religious ideas should be banned to children under the age oif 18 as it is child abuse.
I ask every member of this board to get down on their knees and pray to the all mighty one above all other's Christopher Hitchins for the end of all religions within a week
No religious discussion should ever be science vs religion. The moment such a discussion deteriorates to that level it can no longer be credible. They can easily coexist.
Mozter you say "And science as politics has a woeful record"? That may be true, but it is still a completely pointless statement, because religion, as an alternative, surely has an even more woeful record?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
What the hell do you mean science needs to advise not judge?
Science doesnt do either people do. When people advise/judge while using science at least they are acting on all the available information (be it right or wrong). When people advise/judge with religion they are doing it with absolutely no facts/proof/evidence at all. Just a book that they were told by another human is the word of a god and their personal beliefs of how they wish the world was not how it is.
You simply deny science not because it is sometimes wrong but because it it proves time and time again that your religious beliefs are wrong. There is not one scientific fact in support of your god or of any sort of super natural world existing but you still cling to your beliefs against an overwhelming avalanche of evidence.
Just like maths is never wrong, but people can make mistakes understanding and applying maths.
1+ 1 always = 2. If someone believes 1 + 1 = 3, this does not make maths wrong
Even some of Einstein's theories have already been proven wrong, but that does not make maths and science wrong.
In Science lies the ultimate success of humanity, not in religion, not in big business and certainly not in politics.
God gave us electricity, technology and the cars we drive.
A god didn't give me any bloody thing, I had to work to buy my car.
Or is he being picky and only giving to the dead sea pedestrians again?
No I haven't I am too busy thinking, I will leave the kneeling down to the priest and the poor choir boys.
Programming is traversing, to lots of industries such as law, life sciences, and online advertising. I would expect it will expand into more and more industries, especially newer areas such as machine learning and deep mind neural networks.
Maybe in the future, it will be applied to political science, and perhaps be able to remove all the bullshit. Quantify everything to measure the situation to best determine the most suitable course of action. Provide transparent data is numerical form, create what-if scenarios etc.
So maths/science/computer will continue to expand into all facets of human life. It is moving forward, unlike religion
In maybe 10-20 years it will be used by Judges to make decisions in court. It is already used by legal firms in case preparations, quotes, and to create algorithms that can predict verdicts of cases using precedent etc, etc.
Computers are not perfect, but that is because man's understanding of maths and science is limited- so it, not computers that are responsible for logical errors, political motives or anything else by people that create them. These non-science factors, are exactly that.
AI is seen as a threat because, once perfected - and that's not always the case in these early days - it will take away peoples jobs, so people who are opposed to AI today are not significantly different to the Luddites of the 19th century who destroyed textile machinery as a form of protest against technology taking over their jobs.
The difference is, back then when the Industrial Revolution happened, many agricultural workers whose jobs were taken over by technology had the option of becoming factory workers while textile and other factory workers at least had the opportunity to become foremen or supervisors as production line technology replaced traditional methods.
What will happen in today's world as AI gradually replaces research, IT monitoring, legal issues, psychiatry, medicine, investments and accounting? We need to create new jobs for humans and I predict there will be some new breakthrough in terms of job creation but - other than IT jobs which promote AI - I don't know what that might be. It can't continue in the current direction of just gaming and entertainment.
What kind of jobs will be available to youngsters in 30 - 50 years time?
My father always threatened to send me to technical school if I didn't achieve decent results at school and university but I reckon in today's world you could do a lot worse than being a builder, a plumber or an electrician.
If someone is 18 years old, hard to say what field they should progress with. Maybe just computers, but even computers are automating computer IT jobs....
Maybe the best way is to try to learn programming and have a soft skill- and be an automater within a field, rather than the automated.
I am in online advertising, and it may be automated completely sooner than later, and some of it is already automated by Google and Facebook- so I am planning to expand into more web areas like web development and apps etc.
The 0 and 1 of a computer is like a measuring tape as applied in trade jobs. Everything can be done more accurately, especially when a computer does both the analysis and them even the job itself.
This is always an endless discussion without regard to development of humans. There obviously is no prove that the creation as described in the Bible or other religious documents, ever happened, But the question remains why was religion ever developed in the way it did.
The answer is probably that the chaos created through the early thousands of years in mankind had to be solved, There always seems to have been a believe in natural elements on having a serious impact on human life - hence for example the early religious believes in the sun, moon and planets as gods.
By the arrival of ancient civilizations the need for some norms to organize family groups into tribal groups and even nations with similar tendencies and loyalties arose. The fact is that leaders then had to decide on what should be done to organize mainly primitive people to a more sophisticated level of development and a believe in what the leaders saw necessary to sustain itself.
That gradually developed into religious societies based on loyalty to what they believe in gods. It is also a way to explain why many leaders turned themselves into gods.
Through the centuries some "religions" got stronger by differing themselves from others and especially by conquest, Trade and connections with other societies also had an impact on religion.
Some tendencies also developed to mix up lawmaking with religion. Take for instance the eating of pork - in the colder countries it never was a problem - in the must hotter Middle East pork as a meat deteriorate faster than other meats - or so the leaders believed and they promulgated a health law that eating of pork is forbidden. It would not have been accepted as a normal law by the populace - so the leaders find a solution - make it out that the gods forbid it in the form of a religious law.
Through the centuries the Jewish religion developed into a believe in one God and the present major religions in the world are all off-springs of that religion. Christianity became a religion on its own - but was invariably influenced by other religions it got into contact with. The tribes in Northern Europe believed in a different set of gods and had specific "religious" celebrations - hence the introduction of Christmas as a religious holiday as an example - it was originally known as "Yule" in northern Europe mythology,
Islam as a religion was an offspring of the Jewish religion - but was also influenced by the earlier off-spring Christianity.
The main problem was that religion was used as a means of getting political supremacy in the world. Religion was used to get both political and economic supremacy. That has never changed throughout history of mankind. It became the reason for ancient warfare and establishment of empires and kingdoms and it persisted to this day.
Has religion still have a relevance in the present world environment. yes it probably have. The reason is that the world today have a situation that a huge percentage of the world population still has not reached a level of educational and social development that is required in society to make things work properly. Some norm for social cohesion is required to ensure the uneducated or lowly educated population do not destroy what science have achieved thus far.
The problem in the present world environment is that religion is used by politicians and religious leaders to enhance their own agendas. Democracy - branded as a poor form of governance by the ancient Greeks themselves, is enhancing the usage of religion as another means to influence the uninformed.
It is used by unscrupulous politicians worldwide for their own purposes and it does not mean that any specific group of leaders are exempted from using it.
Is there a religion? There is a believe that religion in fact is a believe inside people to live in peace with their neighbours and all people, to help others as much as they can and to enhance love and friendship as far as they go.
Some serious thoughts on the question about religion remains. The reason for pitting the situation of science as an alternative to religion is a futile mythical question that can never be solved. It is at best a discussion between educated people - not a discussion between the highly educated and lower levels in society where religion takes precedence over everything else.
Very interesting read Mike. I must say, I agree with a lot of your sentiments. I believe that religion could well be a man made concept, both to bring about order and to control the masses. It is highly probable in my view, that religion is an amalgamation of superstition, the enabilty to explain natural phenomenon, a practical order that promotes the greater good and needs of a community or society, the need to control people for greed and power, and the gradual evolution over a long time of history into a singular narrative which has recently split into alternative endings.
On the question of God. I really just don't know, but I am pretty certain that no one religion is right, because all the major religions state that all other religions are wrong. In other words, God is creating people knowing very well that they are basically condemned to hell because they'll follow the "wrong" religion based almost purely on geography and the parents they were born to. That concept makes a loving, caring and fair God impossible to reconcile with the world as it is regarding religion . That leaves 3 possibilities. God does not care, God is a sadist, or God does not exists at all.
You choose one route, and then have a car crash. Is this by God's motivation/intervention? How would God know which route you were going to take? Or were you doomed regardless of the route taken?
The Shrimp could also have chosen another rock to sit on. The easiest prey will always be taken first. Darwin's survival of the fittest theory of evolution is a combination of random chance and natural selection(choice). The statistical average controls evolution.
Religion is practised by every known human civilisation. It appears to be a natural phenomenon- but it has certainly been bastardized by politics. Religion may well be part of evolution, but at some time it could/will be superseded completely. Religion at best- is man's interpretation of God/Infinite Truth etc
A God may well exist, and evolution may actually be the plan. When a civilisation progresses enough through maths and science, technology and mortality- religion can be left behind as part of evolution. It does not appear God is controlling things- but the original blueprint design may have been created by a God, or not!
Good post Shark.
Mozart
You are probably right about perceptions of animals ahead of humans. I can remember a particular incident where it did happen.
I was visiting friends at the Saasveld Forestry College and the wife was baking cakes when in between we chatted. It was getting late at night - around 23:00 - when the dogs started barking and the birds making noise. About two minutes later an earthquake struck the area - it was the result of the major quake that struck the Tulbagh area that day.
Did the dogs and birds scented what was coming and we did not? I suspect the animals sensed that something unnatural was coming and happening and we missed out.
There is another inexplicable in some ways associated with development of mankind. There are many inexplicable developments that defies logic:-
* How did the primitive societies built the Pyramids using stones so big and so heavy that even modern machinery would have difficulty in transporting and placing the stones in place.
* Why have ancients paintings in place showing flying "planes and rockets" that never existing in the early development phase of human societies.
* Why are there references to human beings with animal heads associated with ancient religion and often referred to as gods.
It could perhaps be explained if it happened only in one place in the world (eg Ancient Egypt) - but it happened all over the world and there is evidence of it in South and Central Amercia, China and in Europe.
Some explain it as Advanced Alien Visitors to earth that brought part of its civilization to earth and managed to install it in ancient and primitive mankind. Were they regarded as gods by the ancient humans?
Studies of the Pyramids for instance indicates an advanced level of mathematics being used and the knowledge of the ancients had substantial and surprising knowledge of the planets and even the stars in the universe.
Is such visits by Aliens still happening? Is that the background for frequent sighting of unidentified flying objects around the world explicable? In some cases yes - in others not so easy to explain away.
There are things that even our advanced scientists have seen - but do not understand and really dealt with. As was mentioned above they have barely scratched the surface thus far. Are we really as advanced as is claimed by many?
There are even political implications taking root in many countries and that seems to stem from the political systems imposed on them through advancing developments and especially modern politicians who abuse religion for their own use. That is happening in even the most advanced modern countries.
Did it in fact happen that aliens ever made an impact on the world at the time? Nobody knows - but scientists and others Have discussed the theory but could not prove that it did or did not and if it did happen whether it had an influence on development of mankind. It found its way into Christianity as well where there is a reference to "My father has many homes" in the New Testament,
Sure - theories abound - but proof is really not produced even by our advanced scientists - which in fact could be at this stage only scratching the surface of d evelopment of science and technology.
More from Mikes Gripes
- Mikes GripesStraits closed again . . .155 REPLIES · 1,001 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesRuckers AI Art Contest50 REPLIES · 221 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesLynsey Graham's Sudden Death18 REPLIES · 102 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesThings are getting worse by the day...112 REPLIES · 2,506 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesThe investigation is over at long last . . .37 REPLIES · 178 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesIranian clerics declare religious duty...7 REPLIES · 68 VIEWS