FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Bozo's timelines . . .

Bozo's timelines . . .

Started by Rooinek57 REPLIES693 VIEWS· 18 May 2026, 10:43
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SH
sharkbok
Captain20,097 posts
25 May 2026, 20:44#41

The disgusting American mentality that it is fine to mess up the global economy to put America's agenda first. This was all about trying to make Iran trade oil in dollars and disadvantage China, and force another country into shit one-sided trade deals that favour America.


This was after the liberation tariffs that caused massive damage. If America want to trade less with the world, that is fine, but the way Trump could chop and change tariffs daily just brought total unpredictability.

Rather, do this over time to allow everyone to adapt to changing trade relations.


Trump is trying to cash in the short-term; he cares not about damaging America's long-term reputation as a reliable trade partner. Like China, he routinely violates the WTO standards. It shows that trading blocks are better off following protectionism, and the global free trade or low-tariff arrangements of the past are no longer fit for purpose.


MO
Mozart
Captain49,914 posts
25 May 2026, 21:43#42

As I sat in restaurants in Mykonos and Santorini over the weekend, I was struck by just how many customers were America. These people admired and fought for Europe for it’s traditional values, I doubt they would have been too impressed with the BBC technical expert on religions, who was clearly a moslem and quite strident.


There is no good faith in these people. The Taliban have totally destroyed any progress women have made during the American occupation. They vowed it wouldn’t be so and then just did what they wanted.


Yes there a price to pay, but blockading the Strait is working….these 16th century people have to learn how to live in the world today. It’s truly a curiosity how posters like Rooinek, Shark and 56 who don’t have a moment’s regard for Christianity stick up for these despots.



SH
sharkbok
Captain20,097 posts
25 May 2026, 22:08#43

America fought in WW2, but what happened was that not the American war hero movie that you claim it to be. I have said in the past that America entered the war very late, only after Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, and Hitler declared war on America first.


The stories about France from America's viewpoint is romantic, but apparently many of the American soldiers were rapists, and many French women were victims.


So we are meant to show gratitude for something that happened 100 years ago with people who no longer exist? Eternal gratitude must be shown.


Surely, we should only support sensible actions, and if another NATO partner does something as stupid and morally wrong, they should also be discouraged and not supported.


It is very simple, if any country is attacked and their schools and civil centres are destroyed, then threatened that they are going to be wiped off the face of the earth, how do you think they will react?

Yes, they will go to the ends of the earth to develop a nuke. That is their Trump card to avoid this again in the future.


America killed the current Ayatollah's father, Mother, Son-in-law, and granddaughter, in addition to putting himself in the hospital for injuries that he will never completely recover from.

You think that crazy Iran is going to seriously honour any agreement that they eventually sign?

Right now, they are probably working on a nuke deep underground.


America are so scared of nukes that they have created a self-fulfilling prophecy, where its own actions to avoid nuclear war could end up causing its own destruction. It would be Karma, especially given they are the only country to have used a nuke in battle.


Most people would support a country's right to defend itself from an invader, even if that country is Iran.

America can provide pretext motives about stopping Iran from getting nukes, but this is the same America that has threatened to invade Panama, Canada, and Greenland, in addition to threatening much of the Western Hemisphere. Add in blockades to Cuba and Venezuela. It is only Trump and Putin threatening to nuke countries, but Trump's threats are worse than Putin's.


America, like Russia, is a liar.

ST
Stavanger1
Pro4,532 posts
25 May 2026, 22:39#44

As I sat in restaurants in Mykonos and Santorini over the weekend, I was struck by just how many customers were America. These people admired and fought for Europe.


No they didn't unless these restaurants were crowded with 90+ year old.


fought for Europe for it’s traditional values,


And what traditional European values were those?... Europe's traditional value of colonising half the planet? No this is just you supposing your modern conservative values are the values Europe use to have and what American's fought for. American's fought for freedom and democracy which I can assure is in better health in Europe than modern day America. That and America had to fight because Italy and Germany declared war on the them.


There is no good faith in these people. The Taliban have totally destroyed any progress women have made during the American occupation.


No good faith, yet just a few posts you were posting positively about a potential negotiated deal. Which is it, are they fanatics who can't be trusted or people who you can come to arrangement with?


And what's the Taliban got to do with this. Are you just lumping them in together despite the fact that the Iranian regime and the Taliban are in frequent disputes or you just trying to tar all Muslims as the same?


Yes there a price to pay, but blockading the Strait is working


Do you not understand how high the price is. How many additional people are going to face extreme hunger because of this. And what evidence do you have the blockade is working other than wishing it so because otherwise you will have to acknowledge this was has been an utter debacle.


….these 16th century people have to learn how to live in the world today


Sounds like you don't like the modern world much either and would prefer if everyone could just meet up in the early to mid 20th century.


It’s truly a curiosity how posters like Rooinek, Shark and 56 who don’t have a moment’s regard for Christianity stick up for these despots.


Ah that's some quality propaganda there Dr Goebbels.





BO
bobbok...
Captain10,129 posts
26 May 2026, 03:59#45

It’s truly a curiosity how posters like Rooinek, Shark and 56 who don’t have a moment’s regard for Christianity stick up for these despots.


BO
bobbok...
Captain10,129 posts
26 May 2026, 23:26#46
The War Is Over.The Strait Is Open.We Totally Won.The Iran War According to Donald Trump.


There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!

Truth Social post on March 6 ›

... Iran, which is totally defeated and wants a deal ...

Truth Social post on March 13 ›

... VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS ...
Truth Social post on March 23 ›


We’ll be leaving very soon.

Remarks on March 31 ›

Time is running out — 48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them.

Truth Social post on April 4 ›

They’ve made a proposal, and it’s a significant proposal.

Remarks on April 6 ›

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.
Truth Social post on April 7 ›


I am fully aware that my Representatives are having very positive discussions with the Country of Iran, and that these discussions could lead to something very positive for all.
  1. Truth Social post on May 3 ›
I’m getting a letter supposedly tonight, so we’ll see how that goes.
  1. Press gaggle on May 8 ›
I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!
  1. Truth Social post on May 10 ›
We were getting ready to do a very major attack tomorrow, and I put it off ... because we’ve had very big discussions with Iran ...
  1. Press gaggle on May 18 ›
Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly.
  1. Truth Social post on May 23 ›
... I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side.
  1. Truth Social post on May 24 ›
It will only be a Great Deal for all or, no Deal at all ...
  1. Truth Social post on May 25 ›


TH
TheTraditionalist
Pro4,003 posts
27 May 2026, 05:02#47

The Taliban have totally destroyed any progress women have made during the American occupation.


Talibans are not woke. Time to get rid of them.

MO
Mozart
Captain49,914 posts
27 May 2026, 13:52#48

No good faith, yet just a few posts you were posting positively about a potential negotiated deal. Which is it, are they fanatics who can't be trusted or people who you can come to arrangement with?


I believe my position has been very clear. You can’t trust the Iranians one inch. But for those who thought the Obama deal bought something more than frozen bank accounts for Iran….the announcement was a lot more positive than they were projecting.


My position is the world is struggling because of the Hormuz closure, but already adjusting with new sources and new pipelines. Iran by contrast is in serious trouble economically and logistically. I would continue the blockade until they are clearly defeated.


The difficulty with that is politics at home and European fecklessness. Trump is trying to finesse that, but it’s tricky. Still if I were Iran I’d get this done before the elections. If Republicans do better than expected and Iran remains truculent the remainder of Trump’s term will be very difficult for them.

ST
Stavanger1
Pro4,532 posts
27 May 2026, 14:34#49

But if you can't trust the Iranian's one inch then why were you posting positively about a potential deal with them? I mean at the time there was mummering's of a deal very little was known about it. The reason for optimism was the Trump administration declared a deal was close and for once the Iranian's didn't immediately dismiss his claim, saying progress had been made, but since then Iran has said despite the progress a deal isn't imminent so now it appears a deal in the short term is unlikely.


But for those who thought the Obama deal bought something more than frozen bank accounts for Iran….the announcement was a lot more positive than they were projecting.


How so. What deal did you understand was being close to negotiated, how does that compare to Obama's deal?


My position is the world is struggling because of the Hormuz closure, but already adjusting with new sources and new pipelines. Iran by contrast is in serious trouble economically and logistically. I would continue the blockade until they are clearly defeated.


You're being far too optimistic with you assessment. You brought up the new pipeline of the UAE but that's not due to open till next year assuming all goes well. And then we have other issues of what if Iran attacks the pipeline when it opens. I mean I know it's mostly underground but there is a 17KM stretch that's above ground in additional to several facilities above ground that are needed to run and maintain the pipeline that Iran could potential target. And then that's just the UAE, what about the other countries who have yet to start building the pipelines not one that was already 50% complete.


We already have critical damage done to infrastructure in Gulf countries that will take years to repair as well.


And building new pipelines doesn't help Gulf countries deal with the other threats Iran poses to it. The Gulf countries have established themselves as safe heavens for the rich, as great places to set up data centres and as major hubs for airlines. These are major economic benefits to the Gulf states and all would remains under threat.


So while yes other places are producing more oil to cope, it's only helping so much as we burn through our reserves stocks.


Even if Iran collapses economically we don't know if that would topple the Iranian regime. They are the ones with the guns after all.


And this all has to be weighed against the ever increasing economic damage this is doing to the world and the terrible suffering it's going to inflict on some of the poorest countries in the world. We are talking tens of millions facing extreme hunger.


The difficulty with that is politics at home and European fecklessness. Trump is trying to finesse that, but it’s tricky. Still if I were Iran I’d get this done before the elections. If Republicans do better than expected and Iran remains truculent the remainder of Trump’s term will be very difficult for them.


What exactly do you want the European to do. Say they did row in behind Trump's campaign. What could they offer. Europe could send some more aircraft and assist in bombing Iran, but it seems at this point both America and Israel have achieved all that they can from bombing Iran from the air, it would simply be an exercise in re-arranging rubble.


Europe could send ships to try to re-open the Straight. But would it work? I mean even if say a joint American-European naval forced sailed up and down the straights and tried to escort ships could they actually protect them? As long as Iran controls the massive coastline along the Straight, both the military and civilians ships will be under threat. Would the civilians ships get insurance, would their crews be willing to take the risk. And even if they were willing, how many ships could be escorted at one time? How long would such a naval operation take, would it be indefinite? The truth is the American's could actually do such an operation on their own, but they don't want too, because they know the risks and the costs of such an operation. I think even if Europe did send some ships to help the US still wouldn't risk it, because they know it's going to work.


Still if I were Iran I’d get this done before the elections. If Republicans do better than expected and Iran remains truculent the remainder of Trump’s term will be very difficult for them.


Trump would need a remarkable turn around for the mid terms. As it stands the Republicans are on for a drubbing.




CL
clevermike
Coach57,555 posts
27 May 2026, 15:33#50

Trump called an unnecessary Cabimet meeting to discuss the U<ran situation - to ensure he complies with all the BS written on this site. After all the site members have all the inside information on the Iran issue - especially that Iran is winning the war and the US is in flight.

SH
sharkbok
Captain20,097 posts
27 May 2026, 18:43#51

Iran will drag this out. They know the closer it gets to the US midterms, the better the deal that Trump would agree to. Trump will start getting desperate soon.


The Trumpanzee species needs to try to work out what deal the Iranians would agree to (realistically), and if they would even honour the deal anyway....


A scorpion was traveling across a dry, cracked plain when it came upon a wide river. The water rushed quickly, too deep and strong for the scorpion to cross on its own.

As it searched for a way across, it spotted a frog resting by the riverbank.

“Frog,” the scorpion called out, “will you carry me across the river on your back?”

The frog narrowed its eyes. “How do I know you won’t sting me? If you do, I’ll die.”

The scorpion replied calmly, “Why would I do that? If I sting you, you’ll die—and I’ll drown with you. It would be against my own interest.”


The frog thought for a moment. The logic seemed sound. “Alright,” it said. “Climb on.”

The scorpion carefully stepped onto the frog’s back, and together they began crossing the river. The water swirled around them as they moved steadily toward the other side.

But halfway across, the scorpion suddenly raised its tail and stung the frog.

A sharp pain spread through the frog’s body. As it began to sink beneath the surface, it gasped, “Why did you do that? Now we’ll both die!”


The scorpion, struggling in the water, replied, “I couldn’t help it. It’s in my nature.”

And with that, they both disappeared beneath the current.


DE
Denny
Captain12,893 posts
27 May 2026, 20:20#52

I think Iran is playing the long game. Their economy may be drying up or even collapsing, but they have the advantage of a regime that doesn’t answer to its citizens and lacks elections as we know them in the West. They’re likely eyeing the benefits of Trump being weakened after the midterms and using that to their advantage. Driven by ideology, they’ve managed to survive sanctions, recent bombardments, and whatever else comes their way. They’re in no rush to make a deal, while Trump is eager for one that strips them of nuclear capabilities and limits the freedom of transit through the strait.


This drawn-out, stagnant situation feels like an Iran-driven BS exercise.


MO
Mozart
Captain49,914 posts
27 May 2026, 21:01#53

56 has it ever dawned on you that your whole role on this Board is being a tedious Mr Contrary. Rushing to Google to contradict other posters and now rushing to AI, all trying to deny points of view that fall outside your ‘acceptable zone’.


But not once that I can recall have you ever come up with something new. Here’s the tell, you have made 4468 posts which is a third of Denny’s total but started only 14 strings. Denny meanwhile has started 102 strings just in 2026. His is probably a high ratio of strings to responses but your’s could be the lowest ratio of original material to reactive material on the Board.


And your perceptions are so crude. I post this:


‘While Mr. Trump has repeatedly suggested that an agreement was near, the comments from the three Iranian officials were among the strongest signs since a cease-fire took effect early last month that the two sides may be moving closer to a deal.’


……


Many a slip betwixt the cup and the lip and it would be foolish to declare victory. But a bit more positive than those who not only have declared defeat but are ecstatic whenever they have another talking head who says so.




You respond with this:


But if you can't trust the Iranian's one inch then why were you posting positively about a potential deal with them? I mean at the time there was mummering's of a deal very little was known about it. The reason for optimism was the Trump administration declared a deal was close and for once the Iranian's didn't immediately dismiss his claim, saying progress had been made, but since then Iran has said despite the progress a deal isn't imminent so now it appears a deal in the short term is unlikely.


All I was doing was to say that the complete negativism about a deal was being contradicted by an apparent movement in the Iranian position. Not that a ‘deal’ is necessarily a good thing at this time. Can you actually grasp the distinction.


But regardless, do try to give us something other than reflex AI rebuttals….give us just one idea that germinated in your own brain.


CL
clevermike
Coach57,555 posts
27 May 2026, 21:45#54

SB


Iran will drag this out. They know the closer it gets to the US midterms, the better the deal that Trump would agree to. Trump will start getting desperate soon


Totsl shit again - a sick brain came up with what was normal d uring t he Biden Presidency,

SH
sharkbok
Captain20,097 posts
28 May 2026, 04:41#55

Add Oman to the list of countries that Trump has threatened....


In an extraordinary threat, Trump added: “Oman will behave just like everybody else. Or else we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that. They’ll be fine.”


Trump’s efforts in recent weeks to strike a peace deal with Iran have so far failed to bear fruit. During Wednesday’s meeting, he accused Iran of trying to stall the agreement and “outwait me” until November’s midterm elections in the US. (Ha, Ha...everyone knows that Trump will likely lose the House in the mid-terms, which will weaken Trump, Iran have the cards)


When Trump signaled he was on the verge of a deal at the weekend, Republican hawks who had strongly backed his controversial decision to order war on Iran alongside Israel issued a rare rebuke.


Roger Wicker, who chairs the Senate armed services committee, said the “rumored 60-day ceasefire” would be a “disaster” in a post on social media. “Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught,” he added.


DE
Denny
Captain12,893 posts
28 May 2026, 07:44#56

Iran will drag this out. They know the closer it gets to the US midterms, the better the deal that Trump would agree to. Trump will start getting desperate soon


Totsl shit again - a sick brain came up with what was normal d uring t he Biden Presidency


It's not 'Totsl shit again'.....Trump has been quoted as saying that Iran is dragging out the negotiations for him to lose the mid-terms.

Get your facts right FFS!!!


ST
Stavanger1
Pro4,532 posts
28 May 2026, 08:23#57

56 has it ever dawned on you that your whole role on this Board is being a tedious Mr Contrary. Rushing to Google to contradict other posters and now rushing to AI, all trying to deny points of view that fall outside your ‘acceptable zone’.


My role... ah Moz you secretly love me. I give some meaning to your life.


Gotta love this outrage at actually fact checking what people say and not just taking peoples word at face value.


And that A.I post really got to you didn't it. And no I didn't give it any prompts, it slated you on it's own.


But not once that I can recall have you ever come up with something new. Here’s the tell, you have made 4468 posts which is a third of Denny’s total but started only 14 strings. Denny meanwhile has started 102 strings just in 2026. His is probably a high ratio of strings to responses but your’s could be the lowest ratio of original material to reactive material on the Board.


I know I can sub to the WSJ and copy paste every anti Europe article they write but not use their headline to the article and make up my own more Europe critical headline to accompany it. Will that make me original and a towering intellect like you?

MO
Mozart
Captain49,914 posts
28 May 2026, 16:35#58

Gotta love this outrage at actually fact checking what people say and not just taking peoples word at face value


Outrage? You can’t be serious, that’s outrage? I have no problem with fact checking if it’s balanced. When all you are doing is looking for stuff out there which contradicts somebody’s comment, without looking for facts which support it, that’s not fact checking….it’s dishonest debate.


But I don’t even have a problem with that as long as you don’t present it as some dispassionate, academic analysis.


But when you have nothing to say yourself…..14 strings in 7 years of active posting on the Board…it is rather damning. If you don’t have any ideas yourself, perhaps you should say less about other posters’ ideas,

← PREV3 / 3

More from Mikes Gripes