FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Five people from Trump's political orbit have now pleaded guilty to federal charges

Five people from Trump's political orbit have now pleaded guilty to federal charges

Started by Brycy54 REPLIES1,874 VIEWS· 15 Sept 2018, 00:50
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
15 Sept 2018, 00:50
#1
15 Sept 2018, 00:50#1

People in Trump's political orbit who have pleaded guilty


The list keeps getting longer and longer.... the noose keeps getting tighter around Trump's neck... And DT was just saying how brave Manafort was as well before he flipped and agreed to turn state evidence against him.... but must be worrying times now for the Don with Manafort cooperating with Mueller ...Who will be next?...


PAUL MANAFORT

Manafort was scheduled to go on trial this month on charges tied to Ukrainian political consulting work. He was convicted last month of eight financial crimes in a separate trial in Virginia and faces seven to 10 years in prison in that case. The charges are all unrelated to Trump's campaign.

As part of the new deal, Manafort pleaded guilty to two conspiracy counts. The length of his sentence will ultimately depend on his cooperation. It is unclear what information Manafort is prepared to provide to investigators.

Trump has distanced himself from Manafort, who led his presidential campaign from May 2016 to August 2016. But he has also signaled that he's sympathetic to Manafort's case. It's unclear how Friday's deal might affect any Manafort pursuit of a pardon.

___

GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS

George Papadopoulos, who served as a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, was sentenced last week to 14 days in prison for lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian intermediaries.

Papadopoulos was the first campaign aide sentenced in Mueller's investigation, and he was also the person who triggered the initial Russia investigation two years ago. Memos written by House Republicans and Democrats, now declassified, show that information about Papadopoulos' contacts with Russian intermediaries triggered the FBI's counterintelligence investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign. That probe was later taken over by Mueller.

The White House has said that Papadopoulos was a low-level volunteer on the campaign.

At his sentencing hearing, Papadopoulos told the judge that he was "deeply embarrassed and ashamed" for lying. Prosecutor Andrew Goldstein said Papadopoulos' cooperation "didn't come close to the standard of substantial assistance."

___

MICHAEL FLYNN

Trump's former national security adviser, a retired general who had led the Defense Intelligence Agency, was the first White House official charged in Mueller's probe. His plea in December to one count of lying to the FBI requires Flynn to cooperate with prosecutors.

In August, the special counsel's office said Flynn was still not ready to be sentenced, a sign that he is still cooperating.

Flynn was a national security surrogate during the later parts of the campaign. He was charged with lying about conversations with a Russian ambassador during the transition.

___

RICK GATES

Gates, Manafort's longtime business associate and a former Trump campaign adviser, pleaded guilty in February to federal conspiracy and false-statements charges, saying then he would help Mueller's investigation in "any and all matters."

Gates later turned against his former colleague, spending three days on the stand in Manafort's Virginia trial. He told jurors how he committed crimes alongside Manafort for years and admitted doctoring documents, falsifying information and creating fake loans to lower his former boss' tax bill, and acknowledged stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars without Manafort's knowledge by filing fake expense reports.

___

MICHAEL COHEN

Trump's former personal lawyer and fixer pleaded guilty in federal court last month to campaign-finance violations and other charges, saying Trump directed him to arrange the payment of hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels and a former Playboy model in the run-up to the 2016 campaign.

The account was the first time that a Trump associate had gone to court and implicated Trump in a crime. It's still unclear, though, if a president can be prosecuted.

Cohen's case is separate from Mueller's investigation. In a deal reached with federal prosecutors, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts, including tax evasion. He could get about four to five years in prison at his sentencing, scheduled for Dec. 12.

The Province

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
15 Sept 2018, 00:53
#2
15 Sept 2018, 00:53#2


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
15 Sept 2018, 17:17
#3
15 Sept 2018, 17:17#3
Five people from the Clinton campaign who committed federal crimes and weren’t even charged: Hillary herself. Lying to the FBI and Congress. Transgressing the espionage act. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Manipulating an election. John Podesta. His firm was one of the two firms that Manafort involved in the Ukrainian lobbying issue. It is for these charges that Manafort has now done a plea deal, if I’m not mistaken. Huma Abedin and her ex Antony Weiner.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
15 Sept 2018, 19:17
#4
15 Sept 2018, 19:17#4
There we go again . . .
"buh . . . buh . . . but what about Hillary?"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
15 Sept 2018, 20:31
#5
15 Sept 2018, 20:31#5
Whitewater Convictions: The Clintons were never charged with any crime. Fifteen other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including Jim Guy Tucker, who resigned from office.[44] Jim Guy Tucker: Governor of Arkansas at the time, resigned (fraud, 3 counts) John Haley: attorney for Jim Guy Tucker (tax evasion) William J. Marks, Sr.: Jim Guy Tucker's business partner (conspiracy) Stephen Smith: former Governor Clinton aide (conspiracy to misapply funds). Bill Clinton pardoned. Webster Hubbell: Clinton political supporter; U.S. Associate Attorney General; Rose Law Firm partner (embezzlement, fraud) Jim McDougal: banker, Clinton political supporter: (18 felonies, varied) Susan McDougal: Clinton political supporter (multiple frauds). Bill Clinton pardoned. David Hale: banker, self-proclaimed Clinton political supporter: (conspiracy, fraud) Neal Ainley: Perry County Bank president (embezzled bank funds for Clinton campaign) Chris Wade: Whitewater real estate broker (multiple loan fraud). Bill Clinton pardoned. Larry Kuca: Madison real estate agent (multiple loan fraud) Robert W. Palmer: Madison appraiser (conspiracy). Bill Clinton pardoned. John Latham: Madison Bank CEO (bank fraud) Eugene Fitzhugh: Whitewater defendant (multiple bribery) Charles Matthews: Whitewater defendant (bribery) In March 1992, during his presidential campaign, the Clintons acknowledged that on their 1984 and 1985 tax returns, they had claimed improper tax deductions for interest payments made by the Whitewater Development Company.[45] Due to the age of mistake, the Clintons were not obligated to make good the error, but Bill Clinton announced that they would nonetheless do so.[45] Deputy White House counsel Vince Foster looked into this matter, but did not take any action before his death.[45] On December 28, 1993, almost two years after the original announcement, the Clintons did make a reimbursement payment, for $4,900, to the Internal Revenue Service. This was done just before Justice Department investigators started seeking the Clintons' Whitewater files. The payment was made without filing an amended return (possibly because the three-year period for amended return filing had passed), but did include full interest on the amount of the error, including the additional two-year delay.[45] The Whitewater files in question, publicly released in August 1995, cast some doubt on the Clintons' assertions in the matter, as they showed that the couple was aware that the interest payments in question were paid by the Whitewater corporation, and not them personally.[45] So you really want to go further into Benghazi and the email scandal?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
15 Sept 2018, 20:38
#6
15 Sept 2018, 20:38#6
Of course what that meme does not clearly indicate is that none of the guilty please had anything to do with the so-called Trump/Russia collusion. All of the Whitewater convictions, on the other hand, had everything to do with Whitewater.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
15 Sept 2018, 21:22
#7
15 Sept 2018, 21:22#7

Of course what that meme does not clearly indicate is that none of the guilty please had anything to do with the so-called Trump/Russia collusion

How abysmally ignorant poor KKK and my friend Brycy are. One wonders how its possible to be so dumb!

in vain i warn these two dumbasses about sucking up CNN globalist propaganda. in vain i post articles showing these convictions have zero to do wi th Trump. They blunder on. Bwahahahahahahhahaha

CRASH: CNN Ratings Down 41 Percent From Last Year – Now Trails Nickelodeon In Basic Cable



BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
15 Sept 2018, 21:32
#8
15 Sept 2018, 21:32#8

Windpomp these to morons don' t even begin to grasp the treason involved in the Uranium 1 scandal. Nor who all it involves. Gave them the details but its all beyond their paygrade.

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
16 Sept 2018, 16:41
#9
16 Sept 2018, 16:41#9

...Bean Brain no need to get abusive ...don't shoot the messenger  i've merely pointed out the facts./.. that the Don has surrounded himself with crims...like a good mafia boss...

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
16 Sept 2018, 18:52
#10
16 Sept 2018, 18:52#10
“Posted by: Brycy (3925 posts) Sep 16, 2018, 16:41 ...Bean Brain no need to get abusive ...don't shoot the messenger i've merely pointed out the facts./.. that the Don has surrounded himself with crims...like a good mafia boss...” He must have learnt that from his time when he was friends with the Clintons.
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
16 Sept 2018, 19:44
#11
16 Sept 2018, 19:44#11

...yup, while she was at the pizza parlor hiding the uranium..

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
16 Sept 2018, 20:51
#12
16 Sept 2018, 20:51#12
LOL, Bryce. Yeah the pizza one is s good comeback but I wouldn’t be so relaxed if I was the Clintons. The latest in the Manafort saga could well lead slap bang to Tony Podesta’s front door, which in turn could open up the whole John Podesta/Pizzagate theory again. And we all know that that could in turn point fingers at the Clintons again. Not that they would be touched, IMO. They do have a way of being able to walk away from these kinds of shyte. Then again, you never know. There is always a chance that the swamp could really get drained....
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
17 Sept 2018, 09:21
#13
17 Sept 2018, 09:21#13
At the risk of sounding like KK. Cera, you can't always counter any anti Trump opinion, with, "but the Clinton's....". The Clinton's probably are guilty of a bunch of things, but that has absolutely no bearing on weather or not Trump is guilty of anything. If you think the Clinton's are guilty of something, start a thread on it and everyone can have their say. But to answer every allegation against Trump with some theory about the Clinton's just makes you look silly.  
The truth is, they all stink to high heaven, and it is just as bad in the corporate world. If the general population had even the remotest idea of the shenanigans going on behind closed doors at the top of government and at the top of the corporate world, they'd probably pull all their money out of the banks, hide it under the bed and start subsistence farming to get off the grid.  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Sept 2018, 10:11
#14
17 Sept 2018, 10:11#14
“Posted by: bluebok (3350 posts) Sep 17, 2018, 09:21 At the risk of sound like KK. Cera, you can't always counter any anti Trump opinion, with, "but the Clinton's....". The Clinton's probably are guilty of a bunch of things, but that has absolutely no bearing on weather or not Trump is guilty of anything. If you think the Clinton's are guilty of something, start a thread on it and everyone can have their say. But to answer every allegation against Trump with some theory about the Clinton's just makes you look silly.” Point taken but then you also have to consider my point. There is no way that you can expect any US administration to perform under this abnormal scrutiny and critique and yet they do manage to do it. Remember that it is not only Trump that is being hampered to do his job and deliver on his election promises, it is the entire campaign. To debate this you absolutely have to compare the current president/administration with the previous one/s. That is the only yardstick that you have. Take, for instance, the Meuller investigation. There is much more to it but in a nutshell, they have nothing on Trump. Nothing. They are fishing for a crime and everybody knows it. Anybody who has one bit of common sense should realise it. There wasn’t even a suspicion to start off with. They even had to fabricate a suspicion of a crime. It is unlike any Special Council that has ever existed. Under normal circumstances you discover a crime and then set up a Special Council to investigate it and find the culprit/s. In this case they had an agenda and then fabricated a suspicion and then started to build a crime to nail their target. The only thing that this entire excercise has achieved so far is to find all kinds of shyte that points directly back to the accusers. Imagine if they stuck to their guns and followed through on what they were saying before the election. There is footage where Obama himself said that if Trump, should win they should accept it and support him for the good of the American people, and for the rest of the world, for that matter. Did that happen? I think I have mentioned before that I did an assignment, in Political Science, in the 80s about the US elections. I remember that when Walter Mondale lost to Reagen, his first reaction was something like: “He is our president now and we all have to stand behind and support him for the good of America. Everybody was expected to and did the same for Obama. Why not do the same for Trump? Why keep on behaving like a petulant child? Why oppose everything just for the sake of opposing it. Look at Bret Kavanaugh episode. They have decided that they would oppose any nominee that Trump put forward. They have nothing against Kavanaugh as a person. His only sin is that it is Trump who nominated him.
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
17 Sept 2018, 10:33
#15
17 Sept 2018, 10:33#15
Cera, I'll take your argument because it is true to an extent. I have said on quite a few occasions that the Trump administration has done a lot of good things. Just as the Obama administration did. The thing is, both sides are using the very same tactic against each other. Fling as much shit as possible, some of it is bound to stick. 
As for your point about an administration performing under such scrutiny, well, maybe that is the secret to success? Maybe going forward, any administration, Republican, Democrat or otherwise, should be under the most intense scrutiny all the time. Because if even some of the allegations against past administrations are to be believed, both the Democrats and the R epublicans have been allowed to get away with murder. Probably literally.  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Sept 2018, 11:05
#16
17 Sept 2018, 11:05#16
“Maybe going forward, any administration, Republican, Democrat or otherwise, should be under the most intense scrutiny all the time. ” But it is. It is called govt oversight. The issue is that never before has it come down to this kind of media circus where the media is deliberately used to hamper the functioning of s give because Trump is the president. The media has completely lost the plot. They have been and are still being used and they know it and they are playing along. Do some research yourself. Go onto the websites of the various OIG offices and read the reports and see which investigations are ongoing. Does all of it reach the media? Not a chance. It does not fit the narrative.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
17 Sept 2018, 11:07
#17
17 Sept 2018, 11:07#17
.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
17 Sept 2018, 11:27
#18
17 Sept 2018, 11:27#18
The only question any intelligent person should be asking him/herself is if Mueller has nothing on Trump and if there was no Russian collusion, why doesn't Trump do the interview with Mueller and release his tax returns and why does he spend all day on Twitter bleating "No collusion" and "witch hunt"?
Note how the Trumpanzees write off the Mueller probe as fiction calling it a made-up fabrication. Well, what is not a fabrication is the FACT that Bozo Jr and Jared Kushner met with Russians at Trump Tower where the agenda item was nominally adoption of Russian children but the real item under discussion was Trump's campaign getting dirt on Hillary which they used and which won them the election . . . and Bozo Jr and Kushner both lied about the actual discussion points of the meeting.
Now you Trumpanzees can debate whether those FACTs constitute "collusion" and whether "collusion" is a crime worthy of impeachment, but to pretend none of that happened and there are no grounds for the Mueller probe is just sticking your head in the ground.
Robert Mueller is being painted as a crooked traitor by the Republicans and Trumpanzees but he's just doing his job and pretty much everyone other than Bozo and the Trumpanzees recognises that he's probably the best qualified person on the planet to conduct this probe. Let him do his job. If Bozo has nothing to hide then why isn't he co-operating?
So come on Trumpanzees, if Bozo is as squeaky clean as you all think he is, why doesn't he do the Mueller interview and why doesn't he release his tax returns? You have a lot to say about the Clintons and Obama (because it's all you've got) but not one of you has even attempted to answer the perfectly valid questions I've asked multiple times.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Sept 2018, 14:22
#19
17 Sept 2018, 14:22#19
“Posted by: Koos Kombuis (328 posts) Sep 17, 2018, 11:27 The only question any intelligent person should be asking him/herself is if Mueller has nothing on Trump and if there was no Russian collusion, why doesn't Trump do the interview with Mueller and release his tax returns and why does he spend all day on Twitter bleating "No collusion" and "witch hunt"?” Because it is a perjury trap. I can go into explaining it all to you but what is the use. What did they “get” Flynn on following them questioning him? They caught him in the same BS and now they are too shyte scared to end the whole thing against him by having him sentenced. They, the Meuller gang, are shit scared that he might change his plea to not guilty, forcing their hands to have a proper embarrassing trial. Remember that there was no trial. He was charged, pleaded guilty and then was found guilty. And then..... it surfaced, after his guilty plea, that he was most probably innocent following FBI agents confirming that they did not believe that he lied. He has not been before a court again since his guilty plea and the Meuller team are keeping him away from reappearing before the court be keeping on asking for his sentencing to be postponed. Then, to get back to your intelligent question. Was there a crime in having s meeting with Russians in Trump Tower? Bear in mind that the very same Russian/s met with the Clinton Campaign before and after the meeting in Trump Tower. If an intelligent person would be wondering about the meeting in Trump Tower, shouldn’t that same intelligent person be wondering about the meeting with the Clinton campaign? Oh wait. I’m sorry. I forgot that I’m not allowed to mention the Clintons or the Clinton Campaign.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
17 Sept 2018, 15:56
#20
17 Sept 2018, 15:56#20
"Because it is a perjury trap. I can go into explaining it all to you but what is the use. "
Oh I see, so basically you could answer my question if you wanted to but I'm too dumb to understand your answer? Truly remarkable levels of arrogance.
If anyone wants to avoid perjury it's quite simple . . . don't lie. Bit hard for Bozo though as he lies by default. There's a reason I call him BLOTUS . . . the BL stands for Biggest Liar . . . and of course he looks like a fat, bloated toad.
"If an intelligent person would be wondering about the meeting in Trump Tower, shouldn’t that same intelligent person be wondering about the meeting with the Clinton campaign?"
There we go again. Buh . . . buh . . . but what about Hillary? The primal grunt of the Trumpanzee.
The rest of us all know why you do it. It's because you can't defend Bozo on his own merits so you're reduced to effectively saying that you refuse to defend him because somebody allegedly did something worse (even if the investigations into those supposed crimes came to nothing and even if theirs isn't the administration currently in power).
Childish, cowardly and pathetic . . . but pretty much what I've come to expect from you Trumpanzees.
I suppose in a few days time you'll claim that you did in fact answer my question as to why you think Bozo refuses to reveal his tax returns. That is the Trumpanzee way after all.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Sept 2018, 16:59
#21
17 Sept 2018, 16:59#21
“Oh I see, so basically you could answer my question if you wanted to but I'm too dumb to understand your answer? Truly remarkable levels of arrogance.” No. That’s not what I said. That is your own interpretation of what I said. The reason why I said that was because I couldn’t be bothered to explain something that you already know but are just too bone headed to admit. I’m 100% sure that you know exactly how they go about setting up a perjury trap, especially when you have proven transgressors who are cooperating with the sole purpose of saving their own arses. The irony is that Trump has offered on numerous occasions to have that chat with Mueller but his council has advised otherwise because they now the intricacies. Giuliani was a prosecutor himself and he knows exactly how it is done. The reason why Trump has to be careful is because of how the Special Council has been setup from the word go. As I explained earlier, it has been done the wrong way round.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
17 Sept 2018, 18:47
#22
17 Sept 2018, 18:47#22
Politics in the States is now a game in and of itself. It's obvious Mueller has nothing dispositive on Trump/Russia collusion. It was always a far fetched idea.....a billionaire with almost no chance in the election risking his freedom by illegally colluding with Russia. Forget about it. So why is it still going on? Because it can is the answer. With Sessions recusing and refusing to step down, the Dems had the perfect guy in charge in Rosenstein. Once he appointed Mueller, he stepped aside and became a witness in effect.....leaving Mueller as the man who couldn't be denied. So unless Mueller decides it's time ......this goes on. And so it will be in future. The slightest chink in a politician's or judge's armour will unleash an attempt to destroy him. There may not even be evidence, but if there are allegations and the decision makers are aligned the process will start. This new reality denies the legal choices of voters for an opportunism that isn't even prepared to wait for elections only months from now. It's terrible for the country, makes foreign policy much more difficult, but it's America circa 2018
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
17 Sept 2018, 20:47
#23
17 Sept 2018, 20:47#23

.


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Sept 2018, 23:35
#24
17 Sept 2018, 23:35#24
There we go again. Haven’t we been through this one where it was argued that Trump committed the crime of collusion and that Hillary’s collusion was not a crime. All on the same thread by the same person.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Sept 2018, 02:46
#25
18 Sept 2018, 02:46#25
Rooiaas seems to have found a trite site that feeds his Std4 liberalism.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 09:40
#26
18 Sept 2018, 09:40#26
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I assume Mr I-never-answer-your-questions-ever is referring to me here.
If so, yes, it is a trite site. Incredibly trite in fact!
I've mentioned before where I get my memes from. Perhaps Mr I-never-answer-your-questions-ever can go back and check and when he does, he can start wiping off all that egg that's sliding down his face!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
18 Sept 2018, 09:42
#27
18 Sept 2018, 09:42#27
It has become a joke. These clowns have pushed it too far and are getting what they asked for. I am sure that they are now wondering if it was such a great idea of Diane Feinstein to come up with this sudden “Kavanaugh harassment victim”. Of course they will say that Trump has used the latest declassification of ducumenta and texts as a retaliation for the Kavanaugh milaki. Maybe it is.Who knows? I mean, Shifty Adam Schiff has already been crying to his buddies in the MSM media that it is an abuse of power. What I find strange is that Christopher Wray and Rosenstein hasn’t been crying wolf again, saying that it would compromise means and methods. Maybe they have learnt from the previous exercise.
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 10:57
#28
18 Sept 2018, 10:57#28
Sorry but what is the "Kavanaugh milaki" that you speak of?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
18 Sept 2018, 11:53
#29
18 Sept 2018, 11:53#29
Sorry. I forgot that you are not really as up to speed with the US politics as you pretend to be. Have you managed to catch up on who Adam Schiff is yet?
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:09
#30
18 Sept 2018, 12:09#30
It's not a trick question, I really am just asking what a "Kavanaugh milaki" is. I do know who Brett Kavanaugh is so I assume it's got something to do with him but I can honestly say that I've never heard the word "milaki" before and if that makes me dumb then so be it.
Yes, thanks. Schiff is the Democrat congressman who makes all the Republicans burst into tears every time he says anything.
Not sure where I ever pretended to know a lot about US politics. Can you perhaps point me to the comment of mine that makes you think I do?
Now, what (or who) is a "milaki"?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:12
#31
18 Sept 2018, 12:12#31

Rooitwit you are a truly ignorant ASS! Hahahahahhahaha

For your own sake read the material i post and educate yourself. You are so totally ignorant its hilarious!


KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:36
#32
18 Sept 2018, 12:36#32
So Beeno, do you know what the "Kavanaugh milaki" is?
Please tell me because Ceradyne refuses and Google has as much clue as I do.
I should read the material you post? What, like your breaking news that Bozo called the Mueller investigation an "illegal witch hunt"? Is that the "news" you're referring to . . . the same thing Bozo has been saying since the investigation started and has repeated 3 or 4 times a day every day? Is that really what you call "news"?
Don't tell me you're talking about the garbage you copy and paste or link us to from Fox News?
Surely not!
Beeno, I hate to be the one to break this to you but you and Bozo BLOTUS are probably the last people on this planet who still believe any of the laughable rubbish that Faux News makes up.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:43
#33
18 Sept 2018, 12:43#33

You did not Google.


milaki

KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:50
#34
18 Sept 2018, 12:50#34
You calling me a liar?
I did Google, first "Kavanaugh milaki" which brought back a whole bunch of results without milaki (Missing: milaki ?| ?Must include: ?milaki)
Then I Googled just the word "milaki" and it came back with some hotel in Greece called Milaki Kimolos.
Now go try that yourself before you call me a liar, asshole!
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 12:53
#35
18 Sept 2018, 12:53#35
So as per your link, the Urban Dictionary (facepalm) definition of "milaki" is:
MilakiThe best, shit, shizniztop dog etcJoe: Your mom is Milaki mate. 
BenFuck you Joe u inbred cock.
Oh. Okay. That explains everything then. Gee thanks! (/ facepalm). 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
18 Sept 2018, 13:18
#36
18 Sept 2018, 13:18#36
More obfuscation.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
18 Sept 2018, 13:39
#37
18 Sept 2018, 13:39#37

its amazing how rooitwit is so bent. Worried about the oak. He doesn't do any rugby posts. Seems to have lost all confidence!

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
18 Sept 2018, 13:39
#38
18 Sept 2018, 13:39#38

I also just Googled Kavanaugh Milaki and I got this: https://www.google.com/search?q=kavanaugh+milaki&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab

The first few search results were:

A look at Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh's notable opinions

brett kavanaugh allegations and legal solutions to protect victims

Trump admin withholds Kavanaugh docs

White House ramps up pressure on Dems to meet with Kavanaugh

I guess if I used the term "Kavanaugh debacle we would end up having an argument over the word debacle and nothing about the real issue which is the Kavanaugh debacle. Equally, if I used the term "Kavanaugh mess" or "Kavanaugh issue" or maybe...... wait for it ...... the "Kavanaugh matter". Does "matter" have a familiar ring to it, perhaps?

In any case. I "Googled Kavanaugh" debacle, just for the hell of it, and it came up with this search result:

Kavanaugh Debacle.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
18 Sept 2018, 13:41
#39
18 Sept 2018, 13:41#39

I did try it myself and the link I posted above was top of this  search.

KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
18 Sept 2018, 14:26
#40
18 Sept 2018, 14:26#40
I know what the words "debacle", "mess" and "issue" mean, just never heard the word "malaki". 
Did you mean "malarkey"? Is that what caused the confusion? If so, why didn't you choose one of the words above that you actually know how to spell? I mean, doesn't that make sense? Huh?
Good grief! "Malaki"! Hahahahahahahahaha!
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Mikes Gripes